BUS 311 Week 2 DQ 1 Elements of a Contract (New) / uophelp
For more course tutorials visit www.uophelp.com Elements of a Contract. Read the Case Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz in the text. Answer the following questions: 1. What were the terms of the contract between Campbell and the Wentzes? 2. Did the Wentzes perform under the contract? 3. Did the court find specific performance to be an adequate legal remedy in this case? 4. Why did the court refuse to help Campbell in enforcing its legal contract? 5. How could Campbell change its contract in the future so as to avoid the unconsionability problem?
For more course tutorials visit
www.uophelp.com
Elements of a Contract. Read the Case Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz in the text. Answer the following questions:
1. What were the terms of the contract between Campbell and the Wentzes?
2. Did the Wentzes perform under the contract?
3. Did the court find specific performance to be an adequate legal remedy in this case?
4. Why did the court refuse to help Campbell in enforcing its legal contract?
5. How could Campbell change its contract in the future so as to avoid the unconsionability problem?
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>BUS</strong> <strong>311</strong> <strong>Week</strong> 2 <strong>DQ</strong> 1 <strong>Elements</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Contract</strong> (<strong>New</strong>)<br />
Click Here to Buy the Tutorial<br />
http://www.<strong>uophelp</strong>.com/<strong>BUS</strong>-<strong>311</strong>/product-7133-<strong>BUS</strong>-<strong>311</strong>-<strong>Week</strong>-2-<strong>DQ</strong>-1-<br />
<strong>Elements</strong>-<strong>of</strong>-a-<strong>Contract</strong><br />
For more course tutorials visit<br />
www.<strong>uophelp</strong>.com<br />
<strong>Elements</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Contract</strong>. Read the Case Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz in the text. Answer the<br />
following questions:<br />
1. What were the terms <strong>of</strong> the contract between Campbell and the Wentzes?<br />
2. Did the Wentzes perform under the contract?<br />
3. Did the court find specific performance to be an adequate legal remedy in this case?<br />
4. Why did the court refuse to help Campbell in enforcing its legal contract?<br />
5. How could Campbell change its contract in the future so as to avoid the unconsionability<br />
problem?
Change language