Cost and effectiveness of non-penetrating deep sclerectomy ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ANALYSIS OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN OPHTHALMIC EXAMINATION AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES FOLLOWING INTRACORNEAL RING SEGMENT IMPLANTATION FOR KERATOCONUS RESULTS Forty-two patients were included in this study. Nineteen (45.2%) were male and 23 (54.8%) female. The average age was 24.9 ± 5 years (range 18 to 39 years). Most patients (66.7%) were at or had completed high school, 7.1% had received basic education and 26.2% were at or had completed university. Before surgery 9.5% wore rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lenses, and the other patients were equally distributed between those that used spectacles and those that did not use any optical correction. These patients did not use correction due to poor vision or because they were not able to use RGP contact lenses. Forty-five patients were included in this study, of which three were excluded: two for ring extrusion in one eye and one that became pregnant during the study. Data were analyzed from the remaining 42 patients. Twenty-seven out of a total of 42 patients had surgery in both eyes while 15 were operated in just one eye, presenting a total of 69 eyes with ICRS implantation. Twelve patients did not have ICRS implants in their other eye due to acceptable vision. The other eye of three patients failed to meet the ICRS implantation criteria - these eyes had significant visual acuity impairment. The steep keratometric (Kmax) value decreased from 55.92 D to 52.16 D (0.58) (p
PARANHOS JFS, ET AL. Table 1. Analysis of the influence of variables on QoL general scale of keratoconus patients measured by NEI-RQL (National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life) instrument Univariate GEE model Multivariate GEE model Variable β SE p value β SE p value Gender (female) 0-6.56 03.19
Page 1: ISSN 0004-2749 versão impressa A r
Page 5 and 6: Ressecamento ocular. É hora de vir
Page 7 and 8: Chegou! A monoterapia de 1ª escolh
Page 9 and 10: PUBLICAÇÃO OFICIAL DO CONSELHO BR
Page 11 and 12: PUBLICAÇÃO OFICIAL DO CONSELHO BR
Page 13 and 14: EDITORIAL | EDITORIAL Uma boa fase
Page 15: NOMINATA | LIST OF REVIEWERS Reconh
Page 18 and 19: AVALIAÇÃO ESTRUTURAL DO POLO POST
Page 20 and 21: AVALIAÇÃO ESTRUTURAL DO POLO POST
Page 22 and 23: ARTIGO ORIGINAL | ORIGINAL A RTICLE
Page 24 and 25: RESOURCES USE, COSTS AND EFFECTIVEN
Page 26 and 27: RESOURCES USE, COSTS AND EFFECTIVEN
Page 28 and 29: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OPHTHALMOLOGIC
Page 30 and 31: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OPHTHALMOLOGIC
Page 32 and 33: ARTIGO ORIGINAL | ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Page 38 and 39: ABERRAÇÕES ÓPTICAS DE ALTA ORDEM
Page 40 and 41: USO DE GANCICLOVIR 0,15% GEL PARA T
Page 42 and 43: USO DE GANCICLOVIR 0,15% GEL PARA T
Page 46 and 47: DEMODEX FOLLICULORUM ON THE EYELASH
Page 48 and 49: TRATAMENTO DAS CAVIDADES ANOFTÁLMI
Page 50 and 51: TRATAMENTO DAS CAVIDADES ANOFTÁLMI
Page 54 and 55: ACHADOS OCULARES EM PACIENTES COM M
Page 56 and 57: ACHADOS OCULARES EM PACIENTES COM M
Page 58 and 59: CERATOPLASTIA LAMELAR ANTERIOR PROF
Page 64 and 65: CANALICULITE CRÔNICA SUPURATIVA -
Page 66 and 67: RELATOS DE CASOS | CASE R EPORTS Se
Page 68 and 69: SEBACEOUS CARCINOMA OF THE EYELID -
Page 70 and 71: FABRY DISEASE - IMPORTANCE OF SCREE
Page 72 and 73: SUBRETINAL FIBROSIS IN STARGARDT’
Page 74 and 75: ARTIGO DE REVISÃO | REVIEW ARTICLE
Page 76 and 77: OCULAR ALLERGY LATIN AMERICAN CONSE
Page 78 and 79: OCULAR ALLERGY LATIN AMERICAN CONSE
Page 80 and 81: MARQUE EM SUA AGENDA Foto: André S
Page 82 and 83: AUTORIA Os critérios para autoria
Page 84 and 85:
LISTA DE SÍTIOS DA INTERNET Interf
Page 86 and 87:
ÍNDICE - V. 74 - 2011 Diagnóstico
Page 88 and 89:
ÍNDICE - V. 74 - 2011 Questionári
Page 90 and 91:
ÍNDICE - V. 74 - 2011 Dacryocystor
Page 92 and 93:
ÍNDICE - V. 74 - 2011 Purpura, Sch
Page 94 and 95:
ÍNDICE - V. 74 - 2011 Fernandes TA
Page 96 and 97:
ÍNDICE - V. 74 - 2011 Sousa JM ...
show all

Cost and effectiveness of non-penetrating deep sclerectomy ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?