20.11.2014 Views

Fusão a frio, Tesla, Onda escala, Campo de torção, "Energia livre" = Todos Pseudo-ciência?(Resumo do Português) / Cold fusion, Tesla, Scalar wave, Torsion field, "Free energy".. = All Pseudo science?

O novo paradigma na tecnologia de energia com impactos sócioeconimicos e geopoliticos / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

O novo paradigma na tecnologia de energia com impactos sócioeconimicos e geopoliticos / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Disclosure Impact - Review of Dubious Claims? 12:<br />

Denial of Catastrophic Global Warming By Manma<strong>de</strong> CO2<br />

• ->>cont 10 Crisis I<strong>de</strong>a: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming i<strong>de</strong>a ignores:<br />

• p-Other man/noman ma<strong>de</strong> element might have far more impact, etc : Hence this<br />

phenomena is not even Western <strong>science</strong> consensus, only main media/gov’t(except<br />

US since 2017 in west, but many non western nations actually passively not agreeing)<br />

/NGO/IPCC consensus(Lafrembois, Bo Carter, Moncton, J Lovelock, JL Ward+), which is<br />

opposite of media claims(<strong>science</strong> consensus but still media level <strong>de</strong>bate exists):<br />

• i-IPCC founding charter itself says "Purpose is to show human is changing<br />

climate"(Maurice Strong), ii-Many scientists are forced into or tricked into<br />

signing(K-E Puls, Iv Giaever, Jud Curry+), iii-”Mistakenly" counted as supporting<br />

IPCC(Wil Soon, Al Carlin+), iv-Needs lawsuit to remove name from support(P<br />

Reiter+), v-Hurts career to disagree with media/NGO's view regardless of actual<br />

scientific consensus(Dav Bellamy, Phi Verdier+), vi-Education content altered to<br />

make sense of increasingly contradictory theory(Joh Ball+).<br />

• From pure data tracking/aca<strong>de</strong>mic only point of view as of 2016 from 1990s when<br />

"crisis prediction" <strong>science</strong>-policy was formulated is still being adhered as correct can<br />

be safely stated either some kind of large well coordinated corruption, hoax, fraud, or<br />

beyond normal collective incompetency(Wil Happer, Dav Evans+), i.e. ignore data<br />

altering to keep funding/job security/public reputation etc is much more "practical<br />

way to <strong>do</strong> <strong>science</strong>" than sticking to pure <strong>science</strong>,<br />

398

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!