20.11.2014 Views

Fusão a frio, Tesla, Onda escala, Campo de torção, "Energia livre" = Todos Pseudo-ciência?(Resumo do Português) / Cold fusion, Tesla, Scalar wave, Torsion field, "Free energy".. = All Pseudo science?

O novo paradigma na tecnologia de energia com impactos sócioeconimicos e geopoliticos / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

O novo paradigma na tecnologia de energia com impactos sócioeconimicos e geopoliticos / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Outrageous claims : Energy-Tech Lobby & ZPE -4 Intro<br />

• --cont-->> ►B- TECH LOBBY GROUPS:<br />

Inci<strong>de</strong>ntally, this research <strong>do</strong>es not find financial owners of main media as #1<br />

<strong>do</strong>minator of scientific/tech reality, because "in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly owned" influential<br />

media often leads energy <strong>science</strong> & related geopolitical narrative: eg BBC, DW,<br />

PBS/NPR, UN radio, university media, Tokamak/CERN spokesman etc. There<br />

seems to be some kind of consistent leveraged control by coherent network that<br />

shapes scientific reality in conjunction with financial ownership and rest of the<br />

mass would play along with it to get ahead in that framework while those who<br />

question this fundamental structure is mostly wee<strong>de</strong>d out into uninfluential<br />

positions<br />

• ►C- INFO SOURCE ON OUTRAGEOUS PHYSICAL EFFECT: Even tech data is<br />

sometimes not repeatable like lab experiments. Many are commercialized at<br />

fringe level for easy inspection, but effects such as cold electricity produced by<br />

torsion-scalar effect etc might not show its existence(power and its source both)<br />

on conventionally approved <strong>de</strong>vice even if they run electrical equipment etc.<br />

• ZPE related or "closed system overunity" disruptive effects are often still<br />

automatically barred/unfun<strong>de</strong>d from study or publicize at western mainstream<br />

level, except when it conclu<strong>de</strong>s in <strong>de</strong>bunking. Hence person of public statue is<br />

much better off to <strong>de</strong>clare "there is no credible evi<strong>de</strong>nce for such claims". --<br />

>>cont:<br />

410

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!