12.01.2015 Views

Холодный синтез, Тесла, Скалярное волновое, Торсионные поля, «Свободная энергия».. = Все Псевдонаука? / Cold fusion, Tesla, "Free energy" = Pseudoscience?

(аннотация на русском языке) Новой парадигмы в области энергетических технологий с гео-социально-финансовых последствий / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

(аннотация на русском языке) Новой парадигмы в области энергетических технологий с гео-социально-финансовых последствий / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bio<br />

29: Measuring BioEnergetic Field Effect<br />

• ->>cont: BioEnerge.c field: ■β: Field affec.ng: vi-Non contact Healing:<br />

• Because of alleged significant performance gap by prac66oner(this factor is<br />

conveniently ignored by mainstream & some6mes used to debunk en6re healers<br />

claims), large control sample research of high performer for serious chronic<br />

disease is very difficult with current funding/profit structure(some excep6on in<br />

China), while mainstream will call such test "Immoral"(they declare nonlocality<br />

cannot have any physical effect etc), & can easily obfuscate experiments by<br />

pressuring to set condi6ons that are design to have weaker effect(specula6ng from<br />

other medical tampering & numerous consistent examples of disrup6ve energy tech<br />

experiment tampering by mainstream or its suppor6ng & parasi6c groups).<br />

• This issue can be equated to exaggerated example of marathon running in which not<br />

all runners(e.g. equa6ng as healer) necessarily runs marathon under 2h20mins<br />

(e.g. equivalent of meaning as strong healing effect), and some run at 3hrs(eg barely<br />

marginal effect), and large majority runs marathon at 3.5hrs and more (eg zero<br />

effect or worse). So if randomly select 10 marathon runners(eg healers) to test "in<br />

order to get fair controlled results" as average, there might be no effect at all, or one<br />

or two strong effect would become "sta6s6cal error" - hence s6ll no effect at all.<br />

Furthermore, gathering of high performance healers itself would become "selec6ve<br />

data" and becomes void as qualified research by "trusted scien6fic protocol".<br />

-->>cont:<br />

270<br />

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!