Холодный синтез, Тесла, Скалярное волновое, Торсионные поля, «Свободная энергия».. = Все Псевдонаука? / Cold fusion, Tesla, "Free energy" = Pseudoscience?

What Are Harmonious Free Energy Intro Scenarios? 3
• —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be...
B- Mainstream media(often PR firm used) news documentary pattern
i- Positively bring sensational news for first "free energy" on first 1/4,
ii- Bring mostly debunking “testimony from experts with evidence”,
iii-Highlight rather rare shady claim cases as if that is typical case of the tech,
iv-Conclude it is fraud, yet they are still allowed to practice criminal activities, &
appeal to mass this needs to be prosecuted. OR mainstream documentary to hold back
from reporting new info: no debuking, just keeping away focus from people.
• C- MainstreamBlog/Media/Celebrity/Utility/NGO/TED/Wikipedia /Reader’s
Digest/Forum/Gov’t quote mostly failure results & declare: “◙Warning: LENR fraud,
◙There's no valid science base, ◙ Pathological science, ◙ If it really worked, it’s already
been used”. OR they would pretend debunking consensus info in the past as current
truth, and won't allow update as long as possible, due to difficulty in debunking.
• D- Internet: old info packed “Cold Fusion junk science” web sites to show up on search
engine. Or western medical industry’s std practice suppression on manufactures is
still remotely possible when official commercialization starts from other than Ecat:
• They are banned from quoting scientific validation/testimonials or from other web
sites, or even simply to state the device purpose as energy production, or in extreme
case open source web is prohibited(J Holman & P Dorneanu+), & purchased device
confiscated for “own safety”. Operations don't comply would be legally raided & shut
down. As a result makers offer as unclear purpose of “Research only intended device”.
Another possible simulation is example of Military Dowsing device(p255). >>cont: 338