CRJ 311 Week 3 DQ 2 Arson Dogs (Ash) / crj311dotcom
For more course tutorials visit www.crj311.com Arson dogs are useful tools for finding accelerants in locations where human investigators cannot. Some believe that arson dogs and their indication of possible accelerant residue should not be used as evidence in court. Do you think arson dogs come up with better results than a chemical sniffer? Why or why not? Provide evidence to support your opinion. If your last name begins with A-L, argue your opinion for allowing arson dog findings to be entered into court. If your last name begins with M-Z, argue your opinion for preventing arson dog findings to be entered into court. The body of your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from this week’s required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.
For more course tutorials visit
www.crj311.com
Arson dogs are useful tools for finding accelerants in locations where human investigators cannot. Some believe that arson dogs and their indication of possible accelerant residue should not be used as evidence in court.
Do you think arson dogs come up with better results than a chemical sniffer? Why or why not? Provide evidence to support your opinion.
If your last name begins with A-L, argue your opinion for allowing arson dog findings to be entered into court.
If your last name begins with M-Z, argue your opinion for preventing arson dog findings to be entered into court.
The body of your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from this week’s required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>CRJ</strong> <strong>311</strong> <strong>Week</strong> 3 <strong>DQ</strong> 2 <strong>Arson</strong> <strong>Dogs</strong> (<strong>Ash</strong>)<br />
Click Here to Buy the Tutorial<br />
http://www.crj<strong>311</strong>.com/product-32-<strong>CRJ</strong>-<strong>311</strong>-<strong>Week</strong>-3-<strong>DQ</strong>-2-<strong>Arson</strong>-<strong>Dogs</strong><br />
For more course tutorials visit<br />
www.crj<strong>311</strong><br />
crj<strong>311</strong>.com<br />
<strong>Arson</strong> dogs are useful tools for finding accelerants in locations where human investigators<br />
cannot. Some believe that arson dogs and their indication of possible accelerant residue<br />
should not be used as evidence in court.<br />
Do you think arson dogs come up with better results than a chemical sniffer? Why or why not?<br />
Provide evidence to support your opinion.<br />
If your last name begins with A-L, argue your opinion for allowing arson dog findings to be<br />
entered into court.<br />
If your last name begins with M-Z, argue your opinion for preventing arson dog findings to<br />
be entered into court.<br />
The body of your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with<br />
examples from this week’s required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly<br />
cite any references.
Change language