12.03.2016 Views

EDU675 EDU/675 EDU 675 Week 5 Discussion 1/DQ 1 School Leaders - Engage -[LATEST]

EDU675 EDU/675 EDU 675 Week 5 Discussion 1/DQ 1 School Leaders - Engage -[LATEST]

EDU675 EDU/675 EDU 675 Week 5 Discussion 1/DQ 1 School Leaders - Engage -[LATEST]

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong><strong>EDU</strong><strong>675</strong></strong> <strong>EDU</strong>/<strong>675</strong> <strong>EDU</strong> <strong>675</strong> <strong>Week</strong> 5 <strong>Discussion</strong> 1/<strong>DQ</strong> 1<br />

<strong>School</strong> <strong>Leaders</strong> - <strong>Engage</strong> -[<strong>LATEST</strong>]<br />

Download here<br />

<strong><strong>EDU</strong><strong>675</strong></strong> <strong>EDU</strong>/<strong>675</strong> <strong>EDU</strong> <strong>675</strong> <strong>Week</strong> 5 <strong>Discussion</strong> 1/<strong>DQ</strong> 1 <strong>School</strong> <strong>Leaders</strong> - <strong>Engage</strong> -[<strong>LATEST</strong>] <strong>School</strong> <strong>Leaders</strong> ? <strong>Engage</strong>!<br />

Action research has long been the research method used in education and in many organizations for the purpose<br />

improving the art of teaching and leading. However, there are those that strongly criticize this research method.<br />

Proponents of traditional research methods argue that the data that is collected in action research is not reliable and<br />

does not yield valid results in part, because of possible research bias (Mckay & Marshall, 2001). Initial Post: Read the<br />

articles from Fitchman-Dana (n.d) and Eikeland (2003) and explain in your post how action research will benefit your<br />

setting/organization by granting teachers and other leaders the ability to identify and solve their own problems. Consider,<br />

too, the arguments opposing the use of action research as a validated research methodology. The second article is a<br />

controversial narrative where the author responds to a previous writing which has highlighted the reasons that action<br />

research is not a viable research method. Post your summary of the importance of action research as depicted in these<br />

articles and what points resonate during the implementation of your research. ? Eikeland, O. (2003). Unmet challenges<br />

and unfulfilled promises in action research. Concepts & Transformation, 8(3), 265-273. Retrieved from EBSCOhost<br />

database. ? Fitchman-Dana, N. (n.d.). Top 5 reasons for school leaders to engage in action research. Retrieved from<br />

http://www.aasa.org/content.aspx?id=12826 Guided Response: Respond to at least two peers. In your responses,<br />

consider asking questions of your peers about their responses to encourage further conversation. Responses will be<br />

most effective if they ask a question about your peer?s experiences and the benefits of your action research project.<br />

Your responses may offer additional resource for consideration that supports an alternative viewpoint and critical<br />

thinking skills. Again, though two responses is the basic expectation, for deeper engagement and learning, you are<br />

encouraged to provide responses to any comments or questions others have given to you including the instructor to<br />

further the conversation while also giving you opportunities to demonstrate your content expertise, critical thinking, and<br />

real world experiences with this topic.<br />

Page 1/{nb}

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!