30.05.2016 Views

SBP Working Paper Series STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN

n?u=RePEc:sbp:wpaper:74&r=mon

n?u=RePEc:sbp:wpaper:74&r=mon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.1 Firms<br />

3.1.1 Final Good Producing Firms<br />

The final good producing firms produce final good for consumption and investment by combining the<br />

differentiated goods produced by intermediate good producers according to the following Dixit-Stiglitz<br />

bundling technology:<br />

<br />

p<br />

<br />

p<br />

1<br />

1<br />

p <br />

1<br />

=<br />

j<br />

<br />

p<br />

y ( )<br />

<br />

t<br />

<br />

yt<br />

dj<br />

(2)<br />

0 <br />

<br />

<br />

j<br />

th<br />

Here y<br />

t<br />

, yt<br />

and <br />

p<br />

represent intermediate good produce by j intermediate firm, final output and<br />

constant elasticity of substitution between intermediate products, respectively. For given price and<br />

j<br />

elasticity of substitution, the final good producers choose the quantity y<br />

t<br />

of each intermediate good in<br />

such a way that maximizes their profit. The result of this profit maximization is the following demand<br />

th<br />

function for the j intermediate good:<br />

y<br />

j<br />

t<br />

<br />

p<br />

j<br />

P <br />

t<br />

= yt<br />

(3)<br />

Pt<br />

<br />

The equation (3) shows that the demand for intermediate good j is inversely related to its relative price<br />

and directly related to aggregate output. Aggregating across all intermediate goods and using equation (2),<br />

we get the aggregate price level<br />

P<br />

t<br />

j 1 p <br />

p<br />

P<br />

dj1<br />

1<br />

t<br />

<br />

1<br />

= <br />

(4)<br />

0 <br />

3.1.2 Intermediate Good Producing Firms<br />

Intermediate goods producers demand capital and labour for given wages and rental rate of capital in<br />

competitive factors market. In addition, they set price of their differentiated product while exploiting<br />

some degree of monopoly and considering uncertainty regarding their ability to change prices in future.<br />

The Calvo (1983) model is used to capture the intermediate good producing firms’ behavior under this<br />

uncertainty.<br />

Demand for Labour and Capital<br />

The intermediate good producing firms are assumed to follow a Cobb-Douglas production function with<br />

constant returns to scale (CRS)<br />

j<br />

j<br />

k h<br />

1<br />

j<br />

y = exp( a )<br />

(5)<br />

t<br />

where<br />

way.<br />

t<br />

t<br />

a<br />

t<br />

t1<br />

t<br />

a = a <br />

is a stochastic technology shock that affects all intermediate firms in the same<br />

a<br />

a<br />

t<br />

a<br />

a<br />

is the persistence parameter and <br />

t<br />

~ N(0,<br />

) is an i.i.d. random shock to total factor<br />

productivity (TFP). The parameter is the share of capital in production. Also,<br />

capital and labour utilized by firm j respectively.<br />

j<br />

kt<br />

and<br />

j<br />

ht<br />

are physical<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!