Executive-Summary-The-Economic-Impact-of-the-Death-Penalty-on-the-State-of-Nebraska
Executive-Summary-The-Economic-Impact-of-the-Death-Penalty-on-the-State-of-Nebraska
Executive-Summary-The-Economic-Impact-of-the-Death-Penalty-on-the-State-of-Nebraska
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Ec<strong>on</strong>omic</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Death</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Penalty</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>State</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<strong>Nebraska</strong>: A Taxpayer Burden?<br />
Produced for: Retain A Just <strong>Nebraska</strong><br />
August 15, 2016<br />
Goss & Associates <str<strong>on</strong>g>Ec<strong>on</strong>omic</str<strong>on</strong>g> Soluti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
600 17th Street, Suite 2800 South<br />
Denver, Colorado 80202-5428<br />
303.226.5882<br />
ernieg@creight<strong>on</strong>.edu<br />
Ernest Goss, Ph.D., Principal Investigator<br />
Scott Strain, M.S., Senior Research Ec<strong>on</strong>omist<br />
Jacks<strong>on</strong> Blalock, Research Assistant
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Executive</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Summary</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Ec<strong>on</strong>omic</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Death</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Penalty</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>State</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Nebraska</strong>: A Taxpayer Burden?<br />
This study c<strong>on</strong>cluded that <strong>Nebraska</strong>’s maintenance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> death penalty cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state, in 2015 dollars,<br />
approximately $14.6 milli<strong>on</strong> annually 4 , and each additi<strong>on</strong>al death penalty arraignment costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state almost<br />
$1.5 milli<strong>on</strong>, also in 2015 dollars.<br />
<br />
<br />
research:<br />
• Factors adding to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintaining <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DP:<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Defense costs - In a North Carolina study, DP defense costs per case were found to exceed that<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>-DP cases by almost $50,000. A study using data collected from Nevada defense attorneys<br />
estimated that between $170,000 and $212,000 per case was spent for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> defense <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a DP case<br />
<br />
Pre-trial costs including jury selecti<strong>on</strong> - a Colorado study c<strong>on</strong>cluded that <strong>on</strong> average, a DP<br />
prosecuti<strong>on</strong> that goes to trial required in excess <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> six times more court days than a comparable<br />
<br />
Court days and court costs - In a 2012 study <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital punishment in California, it was<br />
determined that <strong>on</strong> average, DP cases involved 120 more court days than n<strong>on</strong>-capital cases at a<br />
rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $3,589 per court day for an additi<strong>on</strong>al cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $430,680 per case.<br />
Pris<strong>on</strong> costs - California estimated that it costs an additi<strong>on</strong>al $90,000 per year to house a death row<br />
inmate.<br />
Appeals costs - In a California study it was c<strong>on</strong>cluded that due to appeals <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> average time from<br />
habeas corpus<br />
1979.<br />
• <br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
California, 1978-2011, DP cases cost an additi<strong>on</strong>al $121.2 milli<strong>on</strong> per year.<br />
Florida<br />
Maryland<br />
prosecuti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Texas, 1992, A DP case cost an average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $2.3 milli<strong>on</strong>, or about three times <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> impris<strong>on</strong>ing<br />
<br />
4 <br />
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE DEATH PENALTY ON THE STATE OF NEBRASKA: A TAXPAYER BURDEN?:<br />
Page 1
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Executive</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Summary</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
II.<br />
Estimated average prosecuti<strong>on</strong> cost for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> death penalty<br />
compared to life without parole:<br />
• Based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most recent U.S. Census data for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S., Goss & Associates c<strong>on</strong>cludes that:<br />
o<br />
<br />
o<br />
As a percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> overall state and local budgets, DP states spent 3.54 percent <strong>on</strong> justice, 5 while<br />
NDP states spent a much lower 2.93 percent <strong>on</strong> justice.<br />
- Nine <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> top 10 spending states were DP states.<br />
<br />
spent a much lower $6.46 <strong>on</strong> justice.<br />
- Seven <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 top spending states were DP states.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trolling for o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r state characteristics using multivariate statistical analysis, it is estimated that:<br />
<br />
and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> District <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Columbia for 2012 and 2013 were $0.145 per $1,000 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> state gross domestic<br />
product.<br />
- Thus for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two-year period, 2012 and 2013, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> average U.S. state with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DP would have saved<br />
<br />
<br />
two-year period had <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state adopted <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DP.<br />
For 2012 and 2013, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> average U.S. state with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DP would have<br />
saved $46.5 milli<strong>on</strong> had <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state eliminated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DP and replaced<br />
with LWOP.<br />
III. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Nebraska</strong> experience:<br />
• Between 1973 and 2014, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re were 1,842 murders in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>State</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Nebraska</strong>.<br />
<br />
<br />
- Of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se, prosecutors sought <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DP in <strong>on</strong>ly 119 cases, or approximately<br />
2.9 cases per year, resulting in <strong>on</strong>ly 33 death sentences.<br />
- Of <strong>Nebraska</strong>’s 33 individuals sentenced to death.<br />
• <strong>Nebraska</strong> courts commuted 13 sentences.<br />
• Six individuals died in pris<strong>on</strong>.<br />
• One individual’s sentence was vacated.<br />
• Three individuals were executed.<br />
• Attorneys are currently appealing 10 sentences.<br />
5 Throughout this study justice spending refers to state and local spending <strong>on</strong> correcti<strong>on</strong>s, and judicial/legal activities. At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
this study, 2013 census data were <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> latest available.<br />
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE DEATH PENALTY ON THE STATE OF NEBRASKA: A TAXPAYER BURDEN? Page 2
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Executive</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Summary</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
• Based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most recent U.S. Census data, <strong>Nebraska</strong>’s savings for abolishing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DP were:<br />
o<br />
o<br />
In 2013, <strong>Nebraska</strong> spent $532.8 milli<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> justice activities. It is estimated that <strong>Nebraska</strong> would have<br />
<br />
$14.1 milli<strong>on</strong>, or $14.6 milli<strong>on</strong> in 2015 dollars.<br />
<br />
• Each DP prosecuti<strong>on</strong> cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Nebraska</strong> taxpayer almost $1.5 milli<strong>on</strong> above and bey<strong>on</strong>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost<br />
<br />
- $740.1 thousand <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> post-c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> costs over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> life <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pris<strong>on</strong>er.<br />
- $619.4 thousand <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maximum security costs over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> life <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pris<strong>on</strong>er.<br />
- $134.0 thousand <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> in-kind payments, or opportunity costs, over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> life <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pris<strong>on</strong>er.<br />
Each DP prosecuti<strong>on</strong> cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Nebraska</strong> taxpayer almost $1.5<br />
milli<strong>on</strong> above and bey<strong>on</strong>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> LWOP.<br />
• Plea bargaining combined with use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DP can increase <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> taxpayer.<br />
A prime <strong>Nebraska</strong> example <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> how plea<br />
bargaining can increase wr<strong>on</strong>gful prosecuti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
and boost costs is that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “Beatrice Six.” <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
state w<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> six individuals based<br />
<br />
were obtained under threats that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> six would be<br />
given <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> death penalty if <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y did not admit guilt.<br />
In 2008 DNA evidence ex<strong>on</strong>erated all six and in<br />
July 2016, a federal jury awarded <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wr<strong>on</strong>gfully<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victed $28.1 milli<strong>on</strong> in damages.<br />
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE DEATH PENALTY ON THE STATE OF NEBRASKA: A TAXPAYER BURDEN? Page 3
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Executive</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Summary</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Figure EX.1: A snapshot <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 41 years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> executi<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>Nebraska</strong>, 1973-2014<br />
*<br />
Source: Goss & Associates adapted from <strong>Nebraska</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Public Advocacy study <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Nebraska</strong> Capital<br />
Cases.<br />
*No additi<strong>on</strong>al executi<strong>on</strong>s have taken place in <strong>Nebraska</strong> since 2014.<br />
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE DEATH PENALTY ON THE STATE OF NEBRASKA: A TAXPAYER BURDEN? Page 4