SZ&P1 / Konstruktív dráma

Színház és Pedagógia ◆ 1
Heylighen, F.
1993 Epistemology, introduction. Principia Cybernetica.
http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/EPISTEMI.html
Hogan, K. – Pressley, M. (Eds).
1997 Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues
(Advances in Learning & Teaching). MA: Brookline Books.
Jonassen, D.
1991a Evaluating Constructivist Learning. Educational Technology, 36(9), 28–33.
1991b Objectivism vs. Constructivism. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 39(3), 5–14.
1994 Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34–37.
Mayer, R.
1994 Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of
educational psychology's second metaphor. In Educational Psychologist,
31(3/4), 151–161.
Mendelsohn, P. – Dillenbourg, P.
1994 Implementing a model of cognitive development in an intelligent learning
environment. In S. Vosniadou – E. De Corte – H. Mandl eds., Technologybased
learning environments: Psychological and educational foundations,
72–78. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Missimer, C.
1994 Why two heads are better than one: Philosphical and pedagogical
implications of a social view of critical thinking. In K. S. Walters
ed., Re-Thinking reason: New perspectives on critical thinking,
119–133. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Nahalka I.
2002 Hogyan alakul ki a tudás a gyerekekben? Budapest: Nemzeti
Tankönyvkiadó.
2003 A tanulás. In Falus I. szerk., Didaktika. Elméleti alapok a tanítás
tanulásához, 118–153. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
Perkins, D.
1992 Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage. In T.
Duffy–D. Jonassen eds., Constructivism and the technology of instruction:
A conversation, 45–56. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pub.
48
Paper-01.indb 48 2009. 05. 18. 1:06:03