The New Rise in Benefit Popularity: Employers Hold on to More Workers with Better Benefits by Janie Diaz
Today's prospective employees aren't all looking for sky-high wage offerings—many prefer better benefits over a bigger bank account. What can employers do to "wow" these up-and-coming team members?
Today's prospective employees aren't all looking for sky-high wage offerings—many prefer better benefits over a bigger bank account. What can employers do to "wow" these up-and-coming team members?
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>New</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Rise</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Benefit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Popularity</str<strong>on</strong>g>: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Employers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hold</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>More</strong> <strong>Workers</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Better</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Benefit</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />
By <strong>Janie</strong> <strong>Diaz</strong><br />
Of course, workers gravitate more <strong>to</strong>ward higher pay<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g jobs,<br />
especially when they are still under 24 and more likely <strong>to</strong> be<br />
covered <strong>by</strong> mom and dad’s health <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>surance. But benefits are<br />
under the microscope, and employers are k<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d of startled <strong>by</strong><br />
how much Millennials are <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terested <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> benefits like paid<br />
leave, maternity leave, 401(k)s, IRAs, mutual fund opti<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
and shares of the companies they work for.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects of this <strong>on</strong> small bus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>esses can be profound, as<br />
many of them offer very limited W2 positi<strong>on</strong>s, and have a<br />
much greater workforce built of 1099 c<strong>on</strong>trac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> whom<br />
they offer no <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>surance, benefits, or other perks <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> almost<br />
every case. While it isn't entirely <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>ceivable that a small<br />
bus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ess c<strong>on</strong>tract worker has the chance <strong>to</strong> work hard, prove<br />
him or herself and be asked <strong>to</strong> come <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a full- or part-time<br />
capacity, this doesn’t equate <strong>to</strong> benefits. While it’s certa<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ly<br />
true that new and prospective employees are wowed more<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itially <strong>with</strong> higher hourly rates and salaries, if they’ve been<br />
offered more than <strong>on</strong>e job, they may very likely take the <strong>on</strong>e<br />
that pays slightly less but offers better benefits (or benefits at<br />
all.)<br />
Even though Millennials do care more about benefits than<br />
other generati<strong>on</strong>s when they were the same age, the fact still<br />
stands: more experienced, older workers w<strong>on</strong>'t just be hop<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
for more benefits, they'll be demand<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g them unless they’ve<br />
been out of work for so l<strong>on</strong>g that they’re <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a positi<strong>on</strong> where<br />
they have <strong>to</strong> take any offer that comes al<strong>on</strong>g. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> workers<br />
that fall <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>to</strong> older demographics are <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terested <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> different<br />
benefits than their younger counterparts. For example,<br />
employees over 45 will be <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terested <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> hear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g about<br />
whether a company offers term life <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>surance as part of a<br />
benefits package, or dependent-care assistance opti<strong>on</strong>s, and<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a new but grow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g sec<strong>to</strong>r, benefits that help employees<br />
and their families <strong>with</strong> the adopti<strong>on</strong> process. A new wave of<br />
benefit types is com<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>to</strong> the fore, and these will likely be<br />
worth a little bit of a tradeoff <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> terms of salary or hourly pay.<br />
As more and more small bus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>esses c<strong>on</strong>t<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ue <strong>to</strong> grow—<br />
especially <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> IT and big data sec<strong>to</strong>rs and the ecommerce retail<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dustry—figur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g out what <strong>to</strong> pay employees and how <strong>to</strong><br />
deliver benefits <strong>to</strong> them can be a challenge, but it’s <strong>on</strong>e that<br />
must be faced. Employees may <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itially be seduced <strong>with</strong> a<br />
higher wage, but small bus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ess owners stand a higher<br />
chance of los<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g them later down the l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e when they<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terview <strong>with</strong> a competi<strong>to</strong>r that is will<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>to</strong> offer a similar or<br />
slightly lower wage <strong>with</strong> a host of benefits. In this respect,<br />
small- <strong>to</strong> medium-sized bus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>esses that d<strong>on</strong>’t offer benefits<br />
may very likely experience a higher turnover rate, which <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
the end could cost a lot more than offer<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g benefits <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
first place.<br />
So how can bus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ess owners who aren’t able <strong>to</strong> offer benefits<br />
get people <strong>to</strong> come work for them? <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> best way is <strong>to</strong> let<br />
those be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terviewed know right off the bat that the<br />
company is do<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g all it can <strong>to</strong> create benefits, and let<br />
prospective employees know that until that happens,<br />
transparency will be key <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> creat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a c<strong>on</strong>structive<br />
relati<strong>on</strong>ship, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> which workers will be <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formed of any new<br />
potential benefits as so<strong>on</strong> as they become available.