evolution of bridge technology - Structural Engineering Institute
evolution of bridge technology - Structural Engineering Institute
evolution of bridge technology - Structural Engineering Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ASCE/SEI Workshop, Washington DC, Feb.2008<br />
EVOLUTION OF<br />
BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY<br />
BY<br />
MAN-CHUNG TANG, Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Board<br />
Presented by<br />
Tom Ho, Vice President<br />
T.Y. Lin International
1. What has been the most important factor in the<br />
<strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?<br />
2. Would the Romans and the Egyptians be able<br />
to build our <strong>bridge</strong>s if they had the<br />
construction materials <strong>of</strong> today?
Evolution:<br />
Human beings started building <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
many thousand years ago.<br />
What made our modern <strong>bridge</strong>s different<br />
from the ancient ones?
First <strong>of</strong> all,<br />
What are our <strong>bridge</strong>s made up <strong>of</strong>?<br />
Let us look at the<br />
<strong>bridge</strong>s we have today.
In the several thousand years since we started<br />
building <strong>bridge</strong>s, we have built only<br />
FOUR TYPES OF BRIDGES
In the several thousand years since we started<br />
building <strong>bridge</strong>s, we have built only<br />
FOUR TYPES OF BRIDGES<br />
Girder <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
Arch <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
Suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
Cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s
Extradosed Bridge is a combination <strong>of</strong><br />
girder <strong>bridge</strong> and cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>
We can have other combinations too<br />
Partially cable-supported girder <strong>bridge</strong>s.
Franz Dishcinger proposed this<br />
combination <strong>of</strong><br />
cable-stayed and suspension <strong>bridge</strong>
But, still only these four basic types.
All four types<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong>s have<br />
existed for<br />
millenniums!<br />
CONT. BEAM<br />
SUSPENSION<br />
STRESS RIBBON<br />
CABLE-STAYED<br />
GIRDER<br />
They were not as<br />
sophisticated.<br />
But, conceptually<br />
correct nevertheless!
All four types<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> have<br />
existed for<br />
millenniums!<br />
CONT. BEAM<br />
SUSPENSION<br />
STRESS RIBBON<br />
CABLE-STAYED<br />
GIRDER<br />
They build<br />
them<br />
Intuitively<br />
Even before<br />
we gave them<br />
They were not as<br />
sophisticated. a name.<br />
But, conceptually<br />
correct<br />
nevertheless!
All four types<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> have<br />
existed for<br />
millenniums!<br />
CONT. BEAM<br />
SUSPENSION<br />
STRESS RIBBON<br />
GIRDER<br />
They used<br />
Construction materials<br />
available CABLE-STAYED naturally!<br />
Wood, vines, stone, ropes,<br />
They were not as<br />
sophisticated. etc.<br />
But, conceptually<br />
correct<br />
nevertheless!
Sad to admit,<br />
In the last few thousand years,<br />
We have NOT invented any new <strong>bridge</strong> type.
Because we have not invented anything<br />
It is an <strong>evolution</strong><br />
Not any r<strong>evolution</strong>.
Because we have not invented anything<br />
It is an <strong>evolution</strong><br />
Not any r<strong>evolution</strong>.<br />
But, our <strong>bridge</strong>s today are<br />
Bigger, stronger, more sophisticated, more durable<br />
and, more predictable.
Today’s<br />
<strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
Bigger,<br />
stronger,<br />
more<br />
sophisticated,<br />
and<br />
more durable<br />
CRAIGELLACHIE, 1815
What affects the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?
What affect the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?<br />
Science - structural theories<br />
Construction equipment<br />
Construction material
Look at these old, old structures
What affect the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?<br />
?<br />
<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />
Construction equipment<br />
Construction material
What affect the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?<br />
<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />
Construction equipment<br />
Construction material<br />
?
They did it empirically!<br />
<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />
Construction equipment<br />
Construction material
They did it empirically!<br />
Pyramid <strong>of</strong> Dozer<br />
2750BC<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
1st<br />
Qtr<br />
3rd<br />
Qtr<br />
Great Pyramid <strong>of</strong> Gaza<br />
2550 BC<br />
West<br />
North
They did it empirically!<br />
<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />
Construction equipment<br />
Construction material<br />
They made it work, somehow!
<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />
Construction equipment<br />
Construction material<br />
Material has been the most<br />
important factor in the <strong>evolution</strong>!
Creation <strong>of</strong> a <strong>bridge</strong> - A Flow Chart
A Flow Chart
Two Dominating Materials in the<br />
History <strong>of</strong> Bridge Construction are:<br />
Stone<br />
&<br />
Steel<br />
Dominating influence
2000 BC<br />
Two main eras in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>evolution</strong>:<br />
Arch Era<br />
2000BC– 1850AD<br />
Almost 4000 years<br />
Contemporary Era<br />
1850AD - now<br />
Only about 160 years<br />
Roman<br />
Empire<br />
Stone<br />
&<br />
Steel<br />
Arch Era<br />
1850 AD<br />
Contemporary Era<br />
2008 AD
ARCH ERA<br />
Stone
Up to two hundred years ago,<br />
the only construction material available was STONE.<br />
STONE can take high compression,<br />
but very little tension.
Arch is the only <strong>bridge</strong> type that<br />
does not require tensile capacity <strong>of</strong> the material
Arch is the only <strong>bridge</strong> type that<br />
does not require tensile capacity <strong>of</strong> the material
The Romans built<br />
many spectacular<br />
arch <strong>bridge</strong>s
The Romans built<br />
many spectacular<br />
arch <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
Over 2000 years ago!
The Romans built<br />
many spectacular<br />
arch <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
The Roman arches<br />
are all semi-circular
37m<br />
Zhaozhou Bridge<br />
7m<br />
37m<br />
A Roman Arch<br />
Zhaozhou Bridge, China<br />
Span 37m, Rise 7m. Built 600AD<br />
18.5m<br />
The first<br />
non-semi-circular arch <strong>bridge</strong>.
Semi-circular vs Segmental<br />
18.5m<br />
7m
The Romans were really masters on stone arches!
The Romans were really masters on stone arches!<br />
But, for almost one and a half millennia<br />
after the Romans,<br />
nothing new happened!
Then came the<br />
Contemporary Era<br />
From 1850 until now
Contemporary Era<br />
From 1850 until now<br />
Only about 160 years.<br />
But there were more <strong>bridge</strong>s built in these 160 years<br />
than the 4000 years before it.
Contemporary Era<br />
From 1850 until now<br />
Iron & Steel
There was a transition period that we had<br />
IRON as construction material.<br />
Iron is much stronger than stone, but its<br />
tensile capacity is still very limited.
There was a transition period that we had<br />
IRON as construction material.<br />
Iron is much stronger than stone, but its<br />
tensile capacity is still very limited.<br />
We may categorize iron as a primitive<br />
form <strong>of</strong> steel, as far as construction<br />
material is concerned.
The Chinese started building iron chain<br />
suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s around 600 AD
A<br />
suspension <strong>bridge</strong><br />
in Tibet
A <strong>bridge</strong> in Tibet
A <strong>bridge</strong> in Tibet
Iron arch <strong>bridge</strong>s was<br />
popular for a period <strong>of</strong> time<br />
Dom Luis I Bridge<br />
By Gustav Eiffel and Th. Seyrig,<br />
1885, span = 172m<br />
Coalbrookdale Bridge,<br />
Span 30.5m<br />
By Thomas Pritchard, 1779
Menai Bridge – the first major suspension Bridge<br />
Designed by Thomas Telford, span = 176m<br />
based on a patent by James Findley, completed in 1826.<br />
With iron eye bar chains as main cable.
Menai Bridge – the first major suspension Bridge<br />
Designed by Thomas Telford, span = 176m<br />
B<br />
based on a patent by James Findley, completed in 1826.<br />
With iron eye bar chains as main cable.
Steel<br />
Mass production processes were introduced in the mid 19th<br />
century
Steel<br />
Mass production processes were introduced in the mid 19th<br />
century<br />
It changed the entire landscape <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> construction
Steel<br />
Mass production processes were introduced in the mid 19th<br />
century<br />
It changed the entire landscape <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> construction<br />
Steel plates used for girders – boxes and trusses<br />
Steel bars for concrete reinforcement<br />
Steel cold drawn wires for cables<br />
Steel wires for prestressing
Steel<br />
Mass production processes were introduced in the mid 19th<br />
century<br />
Three landmark steel <strong>bridge</strong> structures before the 20 th century:<br />
1. St. Louis Bridge by James Eads, 1874<br />
2. Brooklyn Bridge by the Roeblings, 1883<br />
3. Firth <strong>of</strong> Forth Bridge by John Fowler and Benj. Baker, 1889
The St Louis Bridge over the Mississippi.<br />
Completed 1874, Spans 153m + 158.5m + 153m<br />
Designed by James Eads
The Brooklyn Bridge, New York City<br />
Completed 1883, Span 486m.<br />
Designed by John and Washington Roebling
The Firth <strong>of</strong> Forth Rail Bridge, Scotland.<br />
Completed 1889, Span 521m.<br />
Designed by John Fowler and Benjamin Baker
Then came<br />
A tale <strong>of</strong> three <strong>bridge</strong>s,<br />
in early 1900s……………………<br />
Hell Gate Bridge,<br />
Sydney Harbor Bridge<br />
Bayonne Bridge<br />
The Hell Gate Bridge in New York<br />
by Gustav Lindenthal. Span = 298m.<br />
Completed in 1916.<br />
Bayonne Bridge in NY.<br />
By Othmar Ammann<br />
Span = 503.6m<br />
Constr. 1928 - 1931<br />
Sydney Harbor Bridge.<br />
Span = 503m<br />
by Ralph Freemann,<br />
Const. 1924 - 1932.
Lupu, China, 2004<br />
Span = 550m<br />
New River Gorge, USA, 1978<br />
Span = 518.3m
Competition <strong>of</strong> Span Lengths<br />
Span Year<br />
Hell Gate, NY Gustav Lindenthal 298 1916<br />
Sydney Harbor Ralph Freemann 503 1932<br />
Bayonne, NY Othmar Amman 503.6 1931<br />
New River Gorge, WV Michael Bakers 518.3 1978<br />
Lupu, Shanghai Lin Yuan Pui 550 2004<br />
Caotienmen, Chongqing 552 2008
S p an Leng ths ( m )<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
St. Louis<br />
Pia Maria<br />
Competition <strong>of</strong> Arch Span Length<br />
Garabit<br />
Luis I<br />
Hellgate<br />
Sydney Harbor<br />
Bayonne<br />
1850 1900 1950<br />
Year<br />
2000 2050<br />
New River Gorge<br />
Lupu<br />
Caotienmen
Long span suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
became possible only after high strength wire<br />
was available.
High Strength Steel Wire for Suspension Bridges<br />
Some landmark suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s:<br />
Brooklyn 486m, 1883<br />
George Washington 1067m, 1931<br />
Golden Gate 1280m, 1937<br />
Verranzano Narrows 1298m, 1964<br />
Humber 1410m, 1981<br />
Storebelt 1624m, 1998<br />
Akashi Kaikyo 1991m, 2000
Golden Gate 1280m, 1937<br />
Verranzano Narrows 1298m, 1964<br />
Humber 1410m, 1981
Storebelt 1624m 1998<br />
Akashi 1991m 2000
Span Length (m)<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
Longest Suspension Bridge Spans<br />
Menai<br />
Sarine Valley<br />
Brooklyn<br />
G. Washington<br />
Golden Gate<br />
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050<br />
Year<br />
Verranzano<br />
Humber<br />
Storebelt Akashi
Span Length (m)<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
Longest Suspension Bridge Spans<br />
Iron Steel<br />
Menai<br />
Sarine Valley<br />
Brooklyn<br />
G. Washington<br />
Golden Gate<br />
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050<br />
Year<br />
Verranzano<br />
Humber<br />
Storebelt Akashi
The two giants:<br />
Messina 3,300m<br />
Gibraltar 5,000m
High Strength Wires<br />
also made cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s popular
High Strength Wires<br />
also made cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s popular<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the sag, cables must be stressed to a<br />
high force to be effective.<br />
Consequently, cables must be highly stressed.
High Strength Wires<br />
also made cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s popular<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the sag, cables must be stressed to a<br />
high force to be effective.<br />
Consequently, cables must be highly stressed.<br />
This means, cable wires must be very high strength.
Three World Record Spans within 60km.<br />
(Dusseldorf & Duisburg)<br />
Theodore Heuss 260m 1957<br />
Knie 320m 1970<br />
Neuenkamp 350m 1971
Span Lengths (m)<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
Longest Cable-Stayed Bridge Spans<br />
Stromsund<br />
Th. Heuss<br />
Leverkusen<br />
Knie<br />
Neuenkamp<br />
Sain Nazaire<br />
Annacis<br />
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />
Year<br />
Yangpu Normandy<br />
Tatara<br />
Sutong
High Strength Steel<br />
also made prestressed concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s possible
High Strength Steel<br />
also made prestressed concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s possible<br />
Without high strength steel, prestressing is<br />
not effective.
Two Significant Prestressed Concrete<br />
Box Girder Bridges<br />
Bendorf Bridge<br />
Span 208m, 1962<br />
Second Shibanpo Bridge<br />
Span 330m, 2006
SPAN LENGTH (m)<br />
跨度<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
CONCRETE GIRDER BRIDGES<br />
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />
YEAR OF COMPLETION<br />
混凝土連續剛構<br />
年份<br />
“Concept <strong>of</strong> Structures“ by Man-Chung Tang,, 2003
SPAN LENGTH (m )<br />
跨度<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Milestone Segmental Bridges<br />
Bendorf<br />
Worms<br />
Balduinstein<br />
Koror<br />
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />
YEAR<br />
混凝土連續剛構<br />
Shibanpo<br />
Stolmasundet<br />
Gateway<br />
“Concept <strong>of</strong> Structures“ by Man-Chung Tang,, 2003
跨度<br />
350<br />
SPAN LENGTH (m)<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
LONGEST STEEL BOX GIRDER BRIDGES<br />
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />
YEAR OF COMPLETION<br />
年份<br />
钢箱<br />
“Concept <strong>of</strong> Structures“ by Man-Chung Tang,, 2003
Effect <strong>of</strong> Materials on Evolution <strong>of</strong> Bridge Technology<br />
Wood - timber <strong>bridge</strong>s, short spans<br />
Stone - arch <strong>bridge</strong>s, longer spans<br />
Iron - early suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
Steel - long span girder <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
Steel wires - long span suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
- cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />
- prestressed concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s
Evolution:<br />
1. What was the most important factor in<br />
the <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong>s?<br />
2. Would the Romans and the Egyptians<br />
be able to build our <strong>bridge</strong>s if they had<br />
the construction materials we have?
Evolution:<br />
1. What was the most important factor in<br />
the <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong>s?<br />
2. Would the Romans and the Egyptians<br />
be able to build our <strong>bridge</strong>s if they had<br />
the construction materials we have?<br />
Obviously, no one knows. But let us take an example.
Aerodynamics
Aerodynamics<br />
Most early suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s were failed by wind.<br />
Around 1800, James Findley patented the stiffened<br />
suspension <strong>bridge</strong>.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> those <strong>bridge</strong>s were destroyed by wind.
Aerodynamics<br />
Most early suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s were failed by wind.<br />
Around 1800, James Findley patented the stiffened<br />
suspension <strong>bridge</strong>.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> those <strong>bridge</strong>s were destroyed by wind.<br />
Around 1870, John Roebling installed inclined cables in<br />
Wheeling Bridge to help mitigate wind vibration<br />
problems. It worked!<br />
He found a solution in less than 70 years.
Aerodynamics<br />
Most early suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s were failed by wind.<br />
Around 1800, James Findley patented the stiffened<br />
suspension <strong>bridge</strong>.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> those <strong>bridge</strong>s were destroyed by wind.<br />
Around 1870, John Roebling installed inclined cables in<br />
Wheeling Bridge to help mitigate wind vibration<br />
problems. It worked!<br />
He found a solution in less than 70 years.
<strong>Engineering</strong> is an art, not a science!<br />
Most engineering solutions came before the theory.
<strong>Engineering</strong> is an art, not a science!<br />
Most engineering solutions came before the theory.<br />
And,<br />
Looking at how the Egyptians, the Romans and the<br />
Chinese built their spectacular structures,<br />
<strong>Structural</strong> theories and modern equipments do not<br />
seem that important.
<strong>Engineering</strong> is an art, not a science!<br />
Most engineering solutions came before the theory.<br />
To answer my second question, I may dare say that<br />
given the materials we have today,<br />
The Romans and the Egyptians would most<br />
probably be able to build our <strong>bridge</strong>s too!
But<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />
if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.
But<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />
if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />
Two pre-requisites determine if a <strong>bridge</strong> will be built:<br />
1. Affordability<br />
2. Necessity
But<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />
if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />
Two pre-requisites determine if a <strong>bridge</strong> will be built:<br />
1. Affordability<br />
2. Necessity<br />
Cost vs. Value
COSTS:<br />
Planning<br />
Right <strong>of</strong> Way<br />
Construction<br />
Maintenance<br />
Others<br />
YES!<br />
<<br />
=<br />
><br />
NO!<br />
VALUE:<br />
Functional value<br />
Community Value<br />
Political Value<br />
Aesthetic Value<br />
Others
COSTS:<br />
Planning<br />
Right <strong>of</strong> Way<br />
Construction<br />
Maintenance<br />
Others<br />
<<br />
=<br />
VALUE:<br />
Functional value<br />
Community Value<br />
Political Value<br />
Aesthetic Value<br />
Others
COSTS:<br />
Planning<br />
Right <strong>of</strong> Way<br />
Construction<br />
Maintenance<br />
Related Others to<br />
Construction<br />
cost index.<br />
<<br />
=<br />
VALUE:<br />
Functional value<br />
Community Value<br />
Related to the<br />
Political Living Value Standard.<br />
Aesthetic Value<br />
Others
As our society progresses,<br />
the living standard usually increases<br />
faster than the construction costs.<br />
COSTS:<br />
Planning<br />
Right <strong>of</strong> Way<br />
Construction<br />
Maintenance<br />
Related Others to<br />
Construction<br />
cost index.<br />
<<br />
=<br />
VALUE:<br />
Functional value<br />
Community Value<br />
Related to the<br />
Political Living Value Standard.<br />
Aesthetic Value<br />
Others
As our society progresses,<br />
the living standard usually increases<br />
faster than the construction costs.<br />
That means,<br />
some <strong>bridge</strong>s we can not afford today<br />
may become affordable tomorrow.
As our society progresses,<br />
the living standard usually increases<br />
faster than the construction costs.<br />
That means,<br />
some <strong>bridge</strong>s we can not afford today<br />
may become affordable tomorrow.<br />
That also means, we will be building bigger<br />
and bigger <strong>bridge</strong>s, as time goes by!
As our society progresses,<br />
the living standard usually increases<br />
faster than the construction costs.<br />
That means,<br />
some <strong>bridge</strong>s we can not afford today<br />
may become affordable tomorrow.<br />
That also means, we will be building bigger<br />
and bigger <strong>bridge</strong>s, as time goes by!<br />
Good news for us <strong>bridge</strong> engineers!
But<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />
if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />
Two pre-requisites determine if a <strong>bridge</strong> will be built:<br />
1. Affordability<br />
2. Necessity<br />
When do we need a new <strong>bridge</strong>?
But<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />
if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />
Periods with Great Opportunities:<br />
The expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire<br />
The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong><br />
The re-construction after World War II<br />
Currently, in China, India and other developing countries.
But<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />
if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />
Periods with Great Opportunities:<br />
The expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire - Stone Arch Bridges<br />
The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong> - Steel production<br />
The re-construction after World War II<br />
Currently, in China, India and other developing countries.
But<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />
if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />
The Expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire - Stone Arch Bridges<br />
The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong> - Steel production<br />
The re-construction after World War II -<br />
cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s, orthotropic decks, prestressed<br />
concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s, composite decks
But<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />
if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />
Periods with Great Opportunities:<br />
The Expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire - Stone Arch Bridges<br />
The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong> - Steel production<br />
The re-construction after World War II -<br />
cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s, orthotropic decks, prestressed<br />
concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s, composite decks<br />
Currently, in China, India and other developing countries.?
But<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />
if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />
Periods with Great Opportunities:<br />
The Expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire - Stone Arch Bridges<br />
The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong> - Steel production<br />
The re-construction after World War II -<br />
cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s, orthotropic decks, prestressed<br />
concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s, composite decks<br />
Currently, in China, India and other developing countries.<br />
We will see !
Tot al Lengt h ( km)<br />
90000<br />
80000<br />
70000<br />
60000<br />
50000<br />
40000<br />
30000<br />
20000<br />
10000<br />
0<br />
Starting Year<br />
USA – 1956<br />
China – 1987<br />
FREEWAY CONSTRUCTI ON<br />
USA<br />
Interstate Only<br />
Ca. 1975<br />
China vs. USA<br />
2007<br />
China<br />
Total<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Year s af t er St ar t
Tot al Lengt h ( km)<br />
90000<br />
80000<br />
70000<br />
60000<br />
50000<br />
40000<br />
30000<br />
20000<br />
10000<br />
0<br />
Starting Year<br />
USA – 1956<br />
China – 1987<br />
FREEWAY CONSTRUCTI ON<br />
USA<br />
Interstate Only<br />
2007<br />
China<br />
Total<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Year s af t er St ar t<br />
苏通大桥第五次专家论坛 正交异性板钢桥面的一个新构思 林同棪国际 -邓文中
My last question today:<br />
Currently, we have new materials with very<br />
high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />
What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />
will they bring us ?
My last question today:<br />
Currently, we have new materials with very<br />
high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />
What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />
will they bring us ?<br />
They say,<br />
We can predict the future based on the past!
My last question today:<br />
Currently, we have new materials with very<br />
high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />
For Example…….<br />
What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />
will they bring us ?<br />
They say,<br />
We can predict the future based on the past!
History may <strong>of</strong>fer good<br />
hints for the future!<br />
IN RUSSIA
Here is a historic<br />
record <strong>of</strong> HAIR.<br />
HAIRY<br />
IN RUSSIA<br />
BALD HAIRY<br />
BALD HAIRY BALD HAIRY BALD<br />
Obviously the next President must be a hairy one!!
Let us forget about the<br />
hairs …..<br />
Currently, we have new materials with very<br />
high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />
What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />
will they bring us ?<br />
We know they will definitely enhance the <strong>bridge</strong><br />
performance, but would they bring out now <strong>bridge</strong><br />
types?
Coming back to<br />
My last question today:<br />
Currently, we have new materials with very<br />
high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />
What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />
will they bring us ?<br />
Well, this is the homework for the future<br />
generations <strong>of</strong> engineer,<br />
because I still have no idea!
Thank You!