26.03.2013 Views

evolution of bridge technology - Structural Engineering Institute

evolution of bridge technology - Structural Engineering Institute

evolution of bridge technology - Structural Engineering Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASCE/SEI Workshop, Washington DC, Feb.2008<br />

EVOLUTION OF<br />

BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY<br />

BY<br />

MAN-CHUNG TANG, Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Board<br />

Presented by<br />

Tom Ho, Vice President<br />

T.Y. Lin International


1. What has been the most important factor in the<br />

<strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?<br />

2. Would the Romans and the Egyptians be able<br />

to build our <strong>bridge</strong>s if they had the<br />

construction materials <strong>of</strong> today?


Evolution:<br />

Human beings started building <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

many thousand years ago.<br />

What made our modern <strong>bridge</strong>s different<br />

from the ancient ones?


First <strong>of</strong> all,<br />

What are our <strong>bridge</strong>s made up <strong>of</strong>?<br />

Let us look at the<br />

<strong>bridge</strong>s we have today.


In the several thousand years since we started<br />

building <strong>bridge</strong>s, we have built only<br />

FOUR TYPES OF BRIDGES


In the several thousand years since we started<br />

building <strong>bridge</strong>s, we have built only<br />

FOUR TYPES OF BRIDGES<br />

Girder <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

Arch <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

Suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

Cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s


Extradosed Bridge is a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

girder <strong>bridge</strong> and cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>


We can have other combinations too<br />

Partially cable-supported girder <strong>bridge</strong>s.


Franz Dishcinger proposed this<br />

combination <strong>of</strong><br />

cable-stayed and suspension <strong>bridge</strong>


But, still only these four basic types.


All four types<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong>s have<br />

existed for<br />

millenniums!<br />

CONT. BEAM<br />

SUSPENSION<br />

STRESS RIBBON<br />

CABLE-STAYED<br />

GIRDER<br />

They were not as<br />

sophisticated.<br />

But, conceptually<br />

correct nevertheless!


All four types<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> have<br />

existed for<br />

millenniums!<br />

CONT. BEAM<br />

SUSPENSION<br />

STRESS RIBBON<br />

CABLE-STAYED<br />

GIRDER<br />

They build<br />

them<br />

Intuitively<br />

Even before<br />

we gave them<br />

They were not as<br />

sophisticated. a name.<br />

But, conceptually<br />

correct<br />

nevertheless!


All four types<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> have<br />

existed for<br />

millenniums!<br />

CONT. BEAM<br />

SUSPENSION<br />

STRESS RIBBON<br />

GIRDER<br />

They used<br />

Construction materials<br />

available CABLE-STAYED naturally!<br />

Wood, vines, stone, ropes,<br />

They were not as<br />

sophisticated. etc.<br />

But, conceptually<br />

correct<br />

nevertheless!


Sad to admit,<br />

In the last few thousand years,<br />

We have NOT invented any new <strong>bridge</strong> type.


Because we have not invented anything<br />

It is an <strong>evolution</strong><br />

Not any r<strong>evolution</strong>.


Because we have not invented anything<br />

It is an <strong>evolution</strong><br />

Not any r<strong>evolution</strong>.<br />

But, our <strong>bridge</strong>s today are<br />

Bigger, stronger, more sophisticated, more durable<br />

and, more predictable.


Today’s<br />

<strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

Bigger,<br />

stronger,<br />

more<br />

sophisticated,<br />

and<br />

more durable<br />

CRAIGELLACHIE, 1815


What affects the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?


What affect the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?<br />

Science - structural theories<br />

Construction equipment<br />

Construction material


Look at these old, old structures


What affect the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?<br />

?<br />

<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />

Construction equipment<br />

Construction material


What affect the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong>?<br />

<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />

Construction equipment<br />

Construction material<br />

?


They did it empirically!<br />

<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />

Construction equipment<br />

Construction material


They did it empirically!<br />

Pyramid <strong>of</strong> Dozer<br />

2750BC<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1st<br />

Qtr<br />

3rd<br />

Qtr<br />

Great Pyramid <strong>of</strong> Gaza<br />

2550 BC<br />

West<br />

North


They did it empirically!<br />

<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />

Construction equipment<br />

Construction material<br />

They made it work, somehow!


<strong>Structural</strong> theories<br />

Construction equipment<br />

Construction material<br />

Material has been the most<br />

important factor in the <strong>evolution</strong>!


Creation <strong>of</strong> a <strong>bridge</strong> - A Flow Chart


A Flow Chart


Two Dominating Materials in the<br />

History <strong>of</strong> Bridge Construction are:<br />

Stone<br />

&<br />

Steel<br />

Dominating influence


2000 BC<br />

Two main eras in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>evolution</strong>:<br />

Arch Era<br />

2000BC– 1850AD<br />

Almost 4000 years<br />

Contemporary Era<br />

1850AD - now<br />

Only about 160 years<br />

Roman<br />

Empire<br />

Stone<br />

&<br />

Steel<br />

Arch Era<br />

1850 AD<br />

Contemporary Era<br />

2008 AD


ARCH ERA<br />

Stone


Up to two hundred years ago,<br />

the only construction material available was STONE.<br />

STONE can take high compression,<br />

but very little tension.


Arch is the only <strong>bridge</strong> type that<br />

does not require tensile capacity <strong>of</strong> the material


Arch is the only <strong>bridge</strong> type that<br />

does not require tensile capacity <strong>of</strong> the material


The Romans built<br />

many spectacular<br />

arch <strong>bridge</strong>s


The Romans built<br />

many spectacular<br />

arch <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

Over 2000 years ago!


The Romans built<br />

many spectacular<br />

arch <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

The Roman arches<br />

are all semi-circular


37m<br />

Zhaozhou Bridge<br />

7m<br />

37m<br />

A Roman Arch<br />

Zhaozhou Bridge, China<br />

Span 37m, Rise 7m. Built 600AD<br />

18.5m<br />

The first<br />

non-semi-circular arch <strong>bridge</strong>.


Semi-circular vs Segmental<br />

18.5m<br />

7m


The Romans were really masters on stone arches!


The Romans were really masters on stone arches!<br />

But, for almost one and a half millennia<br />

after the Romans,<br />

nothing new happened!


Then came the<br />

Contemporary Era<br />

From 1850 until now


Contemporary Era<br />

From 1850 until now<br />

Only about 160 years.<br />

But there were more <strong>bridge</strong>s built in these 160 years<br />

than the 4000 years before it.


Contemporary Era<br />

From 1850 until now<br />

Iron & Steel


There was a transition period that we had<br />

IRON as construction material.<br />

Iron is much stronger than stone, but its<br />

tensile capacity is still very limited.


There was a transition period that we had<br />

IRON as construction material.<br />

Iron is much stronger than stone, but its<br />

tensile capacity is still very limited.<br />

We may categorize iron as a primitive<br />

form <strong>of</strong> steel, as far as construction<br />

material is concerned.


The Chinese started building iron chain<br />

suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s around 600 AD


A<br />

suspension <strong>bridge</strong><br />

in Tibet


A <strong>bridge</strong> in Tibet


A <strong>bridge</strong> in Tibet


Iron arch <strong>bridge</strong>s was<br />

popular for a period <strong>of</strong> time<br />

Dom Luis I Bridge<br />

By Gustav Eiffel and Th. Seyrig,<br />

1885, span = 172m<br />

Coalbrookdale Bridge,<br />

Span 30.5m<br />

By Thomas Pritchard, 1779


Menai Bridge – the first major suspension Bridge<br />

Designed by Thomas Telford, span = 176m<br />

based on a patent by James Findley, completed in 1826.<br />

With iron eye bar chains as main cable.


Menai Bridge – the first major suspension Bridge<br />

Designed by Thomas Telford, span = 176m<br />

B<br />

based on a patent by James Findley, completed in 1826.<br />

With iron eye bar chains as main cable.


Steel<br />

Mass production processes were introduced in the mid 19th<br />

century


Steel<br />

Mass production processes were introduced in the mid 19th<br />

century<br />

It changed the entire landscape <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> construction


Steel<br />

Mass production processes were introduced in the mid 19th<br />

century<br />

It changed the entire landscape <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> construction<br />

Steel plates used for girders – boxes and trusses<br />

Steel bars for concrete reinforcement<br />

Steel cold drawn wires for cables<br />

Steel wires for prestressing


Steel<br />

Mass production processes were introduced in the mid 19th<br />

century<br />

Three landmark steel <strong>bridge</strong> structures before the 20 th century:<br />

1. St. Louis Bridge by James Eads, 1874<br />

2. Brooklyn Bridge by the Roeblings, 1883<br />

3. Firth <strong>of</strong> Forth Bridge by John Fowler and Benj. Baker, 1889


The St Louis Bridge over the Mississippi.<br />

Completed 1874, Spans 153m + 158.5m + 153m<br />

Designed by James Eads


The Brooklyn Bridge, New York City<br />

Completed 1883, Span 486m.<br />

Designed by John and Washington Roebling


The Firth <strong>of</strong> Forth Rail Bridge, Scotland.<br />

Completed 1889, Span 521m.<br />

Designed by John Fowler and Benjamin Baker


Then came<br />

A tale <strong>of</strong> three <strong>bridge</strong>s,<br />

in early 1900s……………………<br />

Hell Gate Bridge,<br />

Sydney Harbor Bridge<br />

Bayonne Bridge<br />

The Hell Gate Bridge in New York<br />

by Gustav Lindenthal. Span = 298m.<br />

Completed in 1916.<br />

Bayonne Bridge in NY.<br />

By Othmar Ammann<br />

Span = 503.6m<br />

Constr. 1928 - 1931<br />

Sydney Harbor Bridge.<br />

Span = 503m<br />

by Ralph Freemann,<br />

Const. 1924 - 1932.


Lupu, China, 2004<br />

Span = 550m<br />

New River Gorge, USA, 1978<br />

Span = 518.3m


Competition <strong>of</strong> Span Lengths<br />

Span Year<br />

Hell Gate, NY Gustav Lindenthal 298 1916<br />

Sydney Harbor Ralph Freemann 503 1932<br />

Bayonne, NY Othmar Amman 503.6 1931<br />

New River Gorge, WV Michael Bakers 518.3 1978<br />

Lupu, Shanghai Lin Yuan Pui 550 2004<br />

Caotienmen, Chongqing 552 2008


S p an Leng ths ( m )<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

St. Louis<br />

Pia Maria<br />

Competition <strong>of</strong> Arch Span Length<br />

Garabit<br />

Luis I<br />

Hellgate<br />

Sydney Harbor<br />

Bayonne<br />

1850 1900 1950<br />

Year<br />

2000 2050<br />

New River Gorge<br />

Lupu<br />

Caotienmen


Long span suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

became possible only after high strength wire<br />

was available.


High Strength Steel Wire for Suspension Bridges<br />

Some landmark suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s:<br />

Brooklyn 486m, 1883<br />

George Washington 1067m, 1931<br />

Golden Gate 1280m, 1937<br />

Verranzano Narrows 1298m, 1964<br />

Humber 1410m, 1981<br />

Storebelt 1624m, 1998<br />

Akashi Kaikyo 1991m, 2000


Golden Gate 1280m, 1937<br />

Verranzano Narrows 1298m, 1964<br />

Humber 1410m, 1981


Storebelt 1624m 1998<br />

Akashi 1991m 2000


Span Length (m)<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Longest Suspension Bridge Spans<br />

Menai<br />

Sarine Valley<br />

Brooklyn<br />

G. Washington<br />

Golden Gate<br />

1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050<br />

Year<br />

Verranzano<br />

Humber<br />

Storebelt Akashi


Span Length (m)<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Longest Suspension Bridge Spans<br />

Iron Steel<br />

Menai<br />

Sarine Valley<br />

Brooklyn<br />

G. Washington<br />

Golden Gate<br />

1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050<br />

Year<br />

Verranzano<br />

Humber<br />

Storebelt Akashi


The two giants:<br />

Messina 3,300m<br />

Gibraltar 5,000m


High Strength Wires<br />

also made cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s popular


High Strength Wires<br />

also made cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s popular<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the sag, cables must be stressed to a<br />

high force to be effective.<br />

Consequently, cables must be highly stressed.


High Strength Wires<br />

also made cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s popular<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the sag, cables must be stressed to a<br />

high force to be effective.<br />

Consequently, cables must be highly stressed.<br />

This means, cable wires must be very high strength.


Three World Record Spans within 60km.<br />

(Dusseldorf & Duisburg)<br />

Theodore Heuss 260m 1957<br />

Knie 320m 1970<br />

Neuenkamp 350m 1971


Span Lengths (m)<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Longest Cable-Stayed Bridge Spans<br />

Stromsund<br />

Th. Heuss<br />

Leverkusen<br />

Knie<br />

Neuenkamp<br />

Sain Nazaire<br />

Annacis<br />

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />

Year<br />

Yangpu Normandy<br />

Tatara<br />

Sutong


High Strength Steel<br />

also made prestressed concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s possible


High Strength Steel<br />

also made prestressed concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s possible<br />

Without high strength steel, prestressing is<br />

not effective.


Two Significant Prestressed Concrete<br />

Box Girder Bridges<br />

Bendorf Bridge<br />

Span 208m, 1962<br />

Second Shibanpo Bridge<br />

Span 330m, 2006


SPAN LENGTH (m)<br />

跨度<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

CONCRETE GIRDER BRIDGES<br />

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

YEAR OF COMPLETION<br />

混凝土連續剛構<br />

年份<br />

“Concept <strong>of</strong> Structures“ by Man-Chung Tang,, 2003


SPAN LENGTH (m )<br />

跨度<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Milestone Segmental Bridges<br />

Bendorf<br />

Worms<br />

Balduinstein<br />

Koror<br />

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

YEAR<br />

混凝土連續剛構<br />

Shibanpo<br />

Stolmasundet<br />

Gateway<br />

“Concept <strong>of</strong> Structures“ by Man-Chung Tang,, 2003


跨度<br />

350<br />

SPAN LENGTH (m)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

LONGEST STEEL BOX GIRDER BRIDGES<br />

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

YEAR OF COMPLETION<br />

年份<br />

钢箱<br />

“Concept <strong>of</strong> Structures“ by Man-Chung Tang,, 2003


Effect <strong>of</strong> Materials on Evolution <strong>of</strong> Bridge Technology<br />

Wood - timber <strong>bridge</strong>s, short spans<br />

Stone - arch <strong>bridge</strong>s, longer spans<br />

Iron - early suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

Steel - long span girder <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

Steel wires - long span suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

- cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s<br />

- prestressed concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s


Evolution:<br />

1. What was the most important factor in<br />

the <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong>s?<br />

2. Would the Romans and the Egyptians<br />

be able to build our <strong>bridge</strong>s if they had<br />

the construction materials we have?


Evolution:<br />

1. What was the most important factor in<br />

the <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong>s?<br />

2. Would the Romans and the Egyptians<br />

be able to build our <strong>bridge</strong>s if they had<br />

the construction materials we have?<br />

Obviously, no one knows. But let us take an example.


Aerodynamics


Aerodynamics<br />

Most early suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s were failed by wind.<br />

Around 1800, James Findley patented the stiffened<br />

suspension <strong>bridge</strong>.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> those <strong>bridge</strong>s were destroyed by wind.


Aerodynamics<br />

Most early suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s were failed by wind.<br />

Around 1800, James Findley patented the stiffened<br />

suspension <strong>bridge</strong>.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> those <strong>bridge</strong>s were destroyed by wind.<br />

Around 1870, John Roebling installed inclined cables in<br />

Wheeling Bridge to help mitigate wind vibration<br />

problems. It worked!<br />

He found a solution in less than 70 years.


Aerodynamics<br />

Most early suspension <strong>bridge</strong>s were failed by wind.<br />

Around 1800, James Findley patented the stiffened<br />

suspension <strong>bridge</strong>.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> those <strong>bridge</strong>s were destroyed by wind.<br />

Around 1870, John Roebling installed inclined cables in<br />

Wheeling Bridge to help mitigate wind vibration<br />

problems. It worked!<br />

He found a solution in less than 70 years.


<strong>Engineering</strong> is an art, not a science!<br />

Most engineering solutions came before the theory.


<strong>Engineering</strong> is an art, not a science!<br />

Most engineering solutions came before the theory.<br />

And,<br />

Looking at how the Egyptians, the Romans and the<br />

Chinese built their spectacular structures,<br />

<strong>Structural</strong> theories and modern equipments do not<br />

seem that important.


<strong>Engineering</strong> is an art, not a science!<br />

Most engineering solutions came before the theory.<br />

To answer my second question, I may dare say that<br />

given the materials we have today,<br />

The Romans and the Egyptians would most<br />

probably be able to build our <strong>bridge</strong>s too!


But<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />

if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.


But<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />

if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />

Two pre-requisites determine if a <strong>bridge</strong> will be built:<br />

1. Affordability<br />

2. Necessity


But<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />

if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />

Two pre-requisites determine if a <strong>bridge</strong> will be built:<br />

1. Affordability<br />

2. Necessity<br />

Cost vs. Value


COSTS:<br />

Planning<br />

Right <strong>of</strong> Way<br />

Construction<br />

Maintenance<br />

Others<br />

YES!<br />

<<br />

=<br />

><br />

NO!<br />

VALUE:<br />

Functional value<br />

Community Value<br />

Political Value<br />

Aesthetic Value<br />

Others


COSTS:<br />

Planning<br />

Right <strong>of</strong> Way<br />

Construction<br />

Maintenance<br />

Others<br />

<<br />

=<br />

VALUE:<br />

Functional value<br />

Community Value<br />

Political Value<br />

Aesthetic Value<br />

Others


COSTS:<br />

Planning<br />

Right <strong>of</strong> Way<br />

Construction<br />

Maintenance<br />

Related Others to<br />

Construction<br />

cost index.<br />

<<br />

=<br />

VALUE:<br />

Functional value<br />

Community Value<br />

Related to the<br />

Political Living Value Standard.<br />

Aesthetic Value<br />

Others


As our society progresses,<br />

the living standard usually increases<br />

faster than the construction costs.<br />

COSTS:<br />

Planning<br />

Right <strong>of</strong> Way<br />

Construction<br />

Maintenance<br />

Related Others to<br />

Construction<br />

cost index.<br />

<<br />

=<br />

VALUE:<br />

Functional value<br />

Community Value<br />

Related to the<br />

Political Living Value Standard.<br />

Aesthetic Value<br />

Others


As our society progresses,<br />

the living standard usually increases<br />

faster than the construction costs.<br />

That means,<br />

some <strong>bridge</strong>s we can not afford today<br />

may become affordable tomorrow.


As our society progresses,<br />

the living standard usually increases<br />

faster than the construction costs.<br />

That means,<br />

some <strong>bridge</strong>s we can not afford today<br />

may become affordable tomorrow.<br />

That also means, we will be building bigger<br />

and bigger <strong>bridge</strong>s, as time goes by!


As our society progresses,<br />

the living standard usually increases<br />

faster than the construction costs.<br />

That means,<br />

some <strong>bridge</strong>s we can not afford today<br />

may become affordable tomorrow.<br />

That also means, we will be building bigger<br />

and bigger <strong>bridge</strong>s, as time goes by!<br />

Good news for us <strong>bridge</strong> engineers!


But<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />

if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />

Two pre-requisites determine if a <strong>bridge</strong> will be built:<br />

1. Affordability<br />

2. Necessity<br />

When do we need a new <strong>bridge</strong>?


But<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />

if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />

Periods with Great Opportunities:<br />

The expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire<br />

The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong><br />

The re-construction after World War II<br />

Currently, in China, India and other developing countries.


But<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />

if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />

Periods with Great Opportunities:<br />

The expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire - Stone Arch Bridges<br />

The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong> - Steel production<br />

The re-construction after World War II<br />

Currently, in China, India and other developing countries.


But<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />

if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />

The Expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire - Stone Arch Bridges<br />

The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong> - Steel production<br />

The re-construction after World War II -<br />

cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s, orthotropic decks, prestressed<br />

concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s, composite decks


But<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />

if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />

Periods with Great Opportunities:<br />

The Expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire - Stone Arch Bridges<br />

The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong> - Steel production<br />

The re-construction after World War II -<br />

cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s, orthotropic decks, prestressed<br />

concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s, composite decks<br />

Currently, in China, India and other developing countries.?


But<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> can only happen<br />

if we have the opportunity to build <strong>bridge</strong>s.<br />

Periods with Great Opportunities:<br />

The Expansion <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire - Stone Arch Bridges<br />

The industrial r<strong>evolution</strong> - Steel production<br />

The re-construction after World War II -<br />

cable-stayed <strong>bridge</strong>s, orthotropic decks, prestressed<br />

concrete <strong>bridge</strong>s, composite decks<br />

Currently, in China, India and other developing countries.<br />

We will see !


Tot al Lengt h ( km)<br />

90000<br />

80000<br />

70000<br />

60000<br />

50000<br />

40000<br />

30000<br />

20000<br />

10000<br />

0<br />

Starting Year<br />

USA – 1956<br />

China – 1987<br />

FREEWAY CONSTRUCTI ON<br />

USA<br />

Interstate Only<br />

Ca. 1975<br />

China vs. USA<br />

2007<br />

China<br />

Total<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Year s af t er St ar t


Tot al Lengt h ( km)<br />

90000<br />

80000<br />

70000<br />

60000<br />

50000<br />

40000<br />

30000<br />

20000<br />

10000<br />

0<br />

Starting Year<br />

USA – 1956<br />

China – 1987<br />

FREEWAY CONSTRUCTI ON<br />

USA<br />

Interstate Only<br />

2007<br />

China<br />

Total<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Year s af t er St ar t<br />

苏通大桥第五次专家论坛 正交异性板钢桥面的一个新构思 林同棪国际 -邓文中


My last question today:<br />

Currently, we have new materials with very<br />

high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />

What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />

will they bring us ?


My last question today:<br />

Currently, we have new materials with very<br />

high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />

What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />

will they bring us ?<br />

They say,<br />

We can predict the future based on the past!


My last question today:<br />

Currently, we have new materials with very<br />

high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />

For Example…….<br />

What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />

will they bring us ?<br />

They say,<br />

We can predict the future based on the past!


History may <strong>of</strong>fer good<br />

hints for the future!<br />

IN RUSSIA


Here is a historic<br />

record <strong>of</strong> HAIR.<br />

HAIRY<br />

IN RUSSIA<br />

BALD HAIRY<br />

BALD HAIRY BALD HAIRY BALD<br />

Obviously the next President must be a hairy one!!


Let us forget about the<br />

hairs …..<br />

Currently, we have new materials with very<br />

high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />

What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />

will they bring us ?<br />

We know they will definitely enhance the <strong>bridge</strong><br />

performance, but would they bring out now <strong>bridge</strong><br />

types?


Coming back to<br />

My last question today:<br />

Currently, we have new materials with very<br />

high strength: composites, HPC, etc.<br />

What kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>evolution</strong> in <strong>bridge</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />

will they bring us ?<br />

Well, this is the homework for the future<br />

generations <strong>of</strong> engineer,<br />

because I still have no idea!


Thank You!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!