13.07.2015 Views

revival and reinvention in india's Kathak dance - University of Toronto

revival and reinvention in india's Kathak dance - University of Toronto

revival and reinvention in india's Kathak dance - University of Toronto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Walker: Revival <strong>and</strong> Re<strong>in</strong>vention <strong>in</strong> India’s <strong>Kathak</strong> Dance175found<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> national <strong>in</strong>stitutions after <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>in</strong> 1947. The creation <strong>of</strong>national, “classical” music <strong>and</strong> <strong>dance</strong> genres was fundamental to this culturalrepossession. Central to the <strong>revival</strong> was the need to l<strong>in</strong>k contemporary cultureto an <strong>in</strong>digenous past, one that was, <strong>in</strong> Janet O’Shea’s words, “pure, dist<strong>in</strong>ctive,<strong>and</strong> unaltered by colonial hybridity” (2008:169). This <strong>in</strong>volved a range <strong>of</strong>means from artistic recreations us<strong>in</strong>g source material from the recently rediscoveredSanskrit treatises to explanations <strong>of</strong> all current performance practicethrough connection with elite H<strong>in</strong>du devotional traditions. Yet, <strong>in</strong> North India,music <strong>and</strong> <strong>dance</strong>’s association with the supposedly decadent Muslim courts<strong>and</strong> the sensuous world <strong>of</strong> the courtesans clashed with this view <strong>of</strong> the arts,not to mention with the Victorian sensibilities <strong>of</strong> both British occupiers <strong>and</strong>the British-educated middle class Indians, <strong>and</strong> resulted, by the late 1800s, <strong>in</strong>widespread disda<strong>in</strong> for the perform<strong>in</strong>g arts. The most visible <strong>and</strong> best knownmanifestation <strong>of</strong> this contempt was the “anti-Nautch” movement which soughtto ban the performances <strong>of</strong> hereditary women both <strong>in</strong> the temple (where girlswere still symbolically “married” to the deities) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the courtesan’s salon.Public performance, especially <strong>dance</strong> performance by hereditary women, becamesymbolic <strong>of</strong> the social ills that had supposedly made occupation possible<strong>in</strong> the first place (see Forbes 1996, Rao 1996, <strong>and</strong> Sundar 1995 among others).The music <strong>of</strong> a “pure” Indian culture, although <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g much needed nationalesteem <strong>in</strong> the wake <strong>of</strong> colonial repression, could thus only be reclaimedthrough the removal or marg<strong>in</strong>alization <strong>of</strong> the “impure” elements <strong>in</strong> contemporarymusic <strong>and</strong> simultaneous connection to the ancient past.In the case <strong>of</strong> the <strong>dance</strong> that became kathak, it was the hereditary maleperformers, the <strong>Kathak</strong>s, who played a key role <strong>in</strong> the reclamation. In thecourts <strong>and</strong> kothas (or courtesans’ salons), the <strong>Kathak</strong>s had been the teachers<strong>and</strong> accompanists <strong>of</strong> the courtesans <strong>and</strong> should have had to struggle, by association,with the same level <strong>of</strong> repression <strong>and</strong> contempt as that afforded thewomen. Unlike most other pr<strong>of</strong>essional musicians <strong>in</strong> North India, however,they were (<strong>and</strong> are) H<strong>in</strong>dus. Through the 1800s, the <strong>Kathak</strong>s had effected whatis called a caste shift, where a group <strong>of</strong> lower status people ga<strong>in</strong> some sort <strong>of</strong>advantage (usually f<strong>in</strong>ancial), adopt a new name that separates them from theirorig<strong>in</strong>al group, cultivate behaviours that re<strong>in</strong>force their ameliorated status,<strong>and</strong> create a new history support<strong>in</strong>g the new identity <strong>and</strong> deny<strong>in</strong>g any associationwith the group from which they split <strong>of</strong>f (P<strong>and</strong>ian 1995). Identify<strong>in</strong>gwhat name the “<strong>Kathak</strong>s” went by before 1800 is a matter <strong>of</strong> speculation, butthe shift itself is visible through the British census reports. In the 1832 “Census<strong>of</strong> Population <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Benares,” 118 <strong>Kathak</strong>s described as “Music <strong>and</strong>Danc<strong>in</strong>g Masters” are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the category <strong>of</strong> Shudra, the lowest rank<strong>in</strong>gor servant caste (Pr<strong>in</strong>cep 1832:495). By 1885, however, <strong>in</strong> the “Tribes <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!