09.01.2013 Views

Anti-proliferative effects of a novel isoflavone derivative in medullary ...

Anti-proliferative effects of a novel isoflavone derivative in medullary ...

Anti-proliferative effects of a novel isoflavone derivative in medullary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Journal <strong>of</strong> Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 132 (2012) 256– 261<br />

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology<br />

jo u r n al hom epage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsbmb<br />

<strong>Anti</strong>-<strong>proliferative</strong> <strong>effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>novel</strong> is<strong>of</strong>lavone <strong>derivative</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid<br />

carc<strong>in</strong>oma: An <strong>in</strong> vitro study<br />

Yona Greenman a,∗ , Meital Grafi-Cohen a , Orly Sharon a , Etty Knoll a , Fortune Kohen b ,<br />

Naftali Stern a , Dalia Somjen a<br />

a Institute <strong>of</strong> Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology, Metabolism and Hypertension, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Tel-Aviv University, Israel<br />

b Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Regulation, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel<br />

a r t i c l e i n f o<br />

Article history:<br />

Received 16 April 2012<br />

Received <strong>in</strong> revised form 25 June 2012<br />

Accepted 27 June 2012<br />

Keywords:<br />

Medullary thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

Phytoestrogen<br />

TT cell l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Estrogen receptor<br />

1. Introduction<br />

a b s t r a c t<br />

Differentiated follicular thyroid cancer is significantly more<br />

prevalent <strong>in</strong> female patients, which account approximately for 75%<br />

<strong>of</strong> diagnosed cases [1]. That endogenous estrogen may have a role<br />

<strong>in</strong> the pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> these disorders is supported by the <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> the female:male ratio from 0.8 <strong>in</strong> pre-pubertal to 5.3 <strong>in</strong> postpubertal<br />

children, with a gradual decrease <strong>in</strong> the sex ratio to 2.2<br />

at the peri-menopausal age [2]. The epidemiological observations<br />

led to pathological and <strong>in</strong> vitro studies that demonstrated expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> estrogen receptors <strong>in</strong> normal and malignant thyroid tissues<br />

[3,4] as well as estrogen-mediated promotion <strong>of</strong> thyroid tumor cell<br />

growth [5] and metastatic phenotype [6].<br />

Abbreviations: cD-tBoc, 5-(25)-pentyl-carbamic acid tert-butyl ester N-t-Boc-7-<br />

(O)-carboxymethyl daidze<strong>in</strong>; DPN, diaryl-propionitrile; PPT, propylpyrazole triol.<br />

∗ Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author at: Institute <strong>of</strong> Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology, Metabolism and Hypertension,<br />

Tel.:-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel-Aviv 64239, Israel.<br />

Tel: +972 36973899; fax: +972 36973053.<br />

E-mail address: Greenman@tasmc.health.gov.il (Y. Greenman).<br />

0960-0760/$ – see front matter ©<br />

2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.06.006<br />

Currently available treatments for patients with <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma (MTC) with residual or<br />

recurrent disease after primary surgery have low efficacy rates. In view <strong>of</strong> the possible role <strong>of</strong> estrogen <strong>in</strong><br />

the development <strong>of</strong> thyroid neoplasia, we explored whether proliferation <strong>of</strong> the human MTC TT cell l<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

might be curbed by carboxy-daidze<strong>in</strong>-tBoc (cD-tBoc), a <strong>novel</strong> is<strong>of</strong>lavone <strong>derivative</strong>. Estrogen receptor<br />

(ER) � mRNA expression <strong>in</strong> TT cells was more abundant than ER�, with a ratio <strong>of</strong> 48:1. Estradiol-17�<br />

(E2) <strong>in</strong>creased DNA synthesis <strong>in</strong> a dose dependent manner. [ 3 H]-thymid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>corporation was also stimulated<br />

by the ER� agonist DPN and the ER� agonist PPT. cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>hibited TT cell growth as assessed<br />

by thymid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>corporation, XTT assay, and microscopic analysis <strong>of</strong> culture wells. Creat<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ase specific<br />

activity, a marker <strong>of</strong> the modulatory <strong>effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> estrogen on cell energy metabolism, was likewise<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibited. The <strong>in</strong>hibitory effect <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc on [ 3 H]-thymid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>corporation could be blocked by the ER�<br />

antagonist PTHPP but not by the ER� antagonist MPP, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the anti<strong>proliferative</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> cDtBoc<br />

on these cells is mediated through ER�. Furthermore, cD-tBoc potently <strong>in</strong>creased apoptosis and cell<br />

necrosis. Co-<strong>in</strong>cubation with the antiapoptotic agent Z-VAD-FMK reversed the growth <strong>in</strong>hibitory effect<br />

elicited by cD-tBoc. These results support the hypothesis that estrogens are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the proliferation<br />

<strong>of</strong> MTC. The potent anti-<strong>proliferative</strong> <strong>effects</strong> mediated by is<strong>of</strong>lavone <strong>derivative</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the human MTC cell<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e TT suggest and that this property may be utilized to design effective anti-neoplastic agents.<br />

© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />

In contrast, the sex-hormone milieu contribution to the pathogenesis<br />

and cl<strong>in</strong>ical aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma (MTC)<br />

is less clear. Thyroid glands from healthy men were reported to<br />

have twice as many C-cells as women <strong>in</strong> a post-mortem study<br />

[7]. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, maximum observed calciton<strong>in</strong> concentrations are<br />

higher <strong>in</strong> men, suggest<strong>in</strong>g the need for different normal ranges<br />

for males and females [8,9]. From the epidemiological po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong><br />

view, the female:male ratio for this malignancy is reported to vary<br />

between 1 and 1.3 [10,11]. Nevertheless, male sex was consistently<br />

associated with decreased survival <strong>in</strong> most studies [12,13], rem<strong>in</strong>iscent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the poor prognosis <strong>of</strong> differentiated follicular thyroid<br />

cancer <strong>in</strong> men [13]. Furthermore, male patients had larger tumors<br />

as well as a higher <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> extrathyroidal extension and distant<br />

metastasis <strong>in</strong> comparison to their female counterparts [1]. When<br />

adjustments for stag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> disease were performed, the <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

<strong>of</strong> gender on survival lost statistical significance <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>stances,<br />

reflect<strong>in</strong>g the fact that male patients had more advanced disease at<br />

diagnosis [14].<br />

At present, the only effective treatment modality for MTC is<br />

complete excision <strong>of</strong> the tumor by total thyroidectomy, and, when<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated, lymph node neck dissection. Unfortunately, curative<br />

surgery is <strong>of</strong>ten unachievable, as over 50% <strong>of</strong> patients present with


Y. Greenman et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 132 (2012) 256– 261 257<br />

stage III or IV disease at the time <strong>of</strong> diagnosis [11]. Currently available<br />

treatments for patients with residual or recurrent disease after<br />

primary surgery have low efficacy rates. Chemotherapeutical regimens<br />

may achieve partial remission rates <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 10–20%,<br />

that are generally short lived [15]. Therefore cytotoxic chemotherapy<br />

is not recommended as first-l<strong>in</strong>e therapy for these patients.<br />

Similarly, the role <strong>of</strong> adjunctive external beam irradiation to the<br />

neck <strong>in</strong> MTC is controversial, and its use is considered only <strong>in</strong><br />

selected cases [15]. In the absence <strong>of</strong> established effective systemic<br />

therapies, the development <strong>of</strong> new drugs for MTC has been an area<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tense research. Compounds that <strong>in</strong>hibit receptor or <strong>in</strong>tracellular<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ases, and <strong>in</strong> particular molecules that block RET k<strong>in</strong>ase<br />

activity or downstream signal<strong>in</strong>g pathways have shown promise <strong>in</strong><br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials [16]. Nevertheless, the low rate <strong>of</strong> partial responses<br />

and absence <strong>of</strong> complete responses <strong>in</strong> the various trials should<br />

encourage the development <strong>of</strong> different treatment strategies.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the putative role <strong>of</strong> estrogen <strong>in</strong> the development <strong>of</strong><br />

thyroid neoplasia as implied by the data described here<strong>in</strong>, target<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> estrogen receptors could be an attractive strategy for the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> MTC. Here we explore whether proliferation <strong>of</strong><br />

the human MTC TT cell l<strong>in</strong>e, may be curbed by <strong>novel</strong> is<strong>of</strong>lavone<br />

<strong>derivative</strong>s generated <strong>in</strong> our laboratory, which possess potent anticancer<br />

<strong>effects</strong> <strong>in</strong> human ovarian cancer cells through <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

with estrogen receptor (ER) � [17].<br />

2. Materials and methods<br />

2.1. Reagents<br />

All reagents were <strong>of</strong> analytical grade. Chemicals, steroids and<br />

PPT (ER� agonist) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MI). DPN<br />

(ER� agonist), MPP (anti-ER�) and PTHPP (anti-ER�) were purchased<br />

from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). The apoptotic <strong>in</strong>hibitor<br />

Z-VADFMK Me ester was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Axxora (San Diego, CA).<br />

Methyl-[ 3 H]-thymid<strong>in</strong>e (5 Ci/mmol) was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from New England<br />

Nuclear (Boston, MA). Synthesis <strong>of</strong> t-Boc <strong>derivative</strong>s <strong>of</strong> carboxy<br />

alkyl is<strong>of</strong>lavones were prepared as described previously [17] by<br />

Biol<strong>in</strong>e Innovations, Jerusalem, Israel.<br />

2.2. Cell culture<br />

The human <strong>medullary</strong> carc<strong>in</strong>oma cell l<strong>in</strong>e TT was purchased<br />

from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Cells were cultured<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ham’s F12K medium with 2 mM l-glutam<strong>in</strong>e adjusted to<br />

conta<strong>in</strong> 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate and 10% fetal bov<strong>in</strong>e serum,<br />

grown to sub-confluence and then treated with various hormones<br />

or agents for 24 h as <strong>in</strong>dicated.<br />

2.3. Preparation <strong>of</strong> total RNA, RT-PCR and RNA quantification<br />

Total RNA from TT cells was extracted us<strong>in</strong>g the TRIzol reagent<br />

(Gibco Life Technologies) accord<strong>in</strong>g to the manufacturer’s <strong>in</strong>structions.<br />

Extracted RNA (1 �g) was then reverse transcribed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the RevertAid TM First Strand cDNA synthesis kit from Fermentas<br />

Life Science (St. Leon-Rot, Germany). mRNA expression was<br />

quantified with an ABI 7700 Real Time PCR System us<strong>in</strong>g specific<br />

primer probe sets for estrogen receptors (ER) � and � obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Each RT-PCR conta<strong>in</strong>ed 12.5 �l<br />

TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix, 1.25 �l Assays-on demand<br />

Gene Expression Assay Mix for either ER� (HS00174860M1) or<br />

ER� (HS00230957M1), 2.5 �l nuclease-free water, and 9 �l cDNA.<br />

Endogenous controls (RNAse P) were run <strong>in</strong> triplicate to assure<br />

repeatability. In this system, cycle threshold (CT) <strong>in</strong>dicates the fractional<br />

cycle number at which the reporter fluorescence generated<br />

by cleavage <strong>of</strong> the probe passes a fixed threshold above basel<strong>in</strong>e and<br />

�CT represents relative gene expression. The relative difference <strong>in</strong><br />

expression <strong>of</strong> the gene <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest and <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternal reference gene<br />

is represented by ��CT. Changes <strong>of</strong> gene expression <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

the calibrator are represented by 2 −�C T .<br />

2.4. Assessment <strong>of</strong> DNA synthesis<br />

TT cells were grown until sub-confluence, and then treated with<br />

various hormones or agents for 24 h as <strong>in</strong>dicated. At the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubation,<br />

[ 3 H]-thymid<strong>in</strong>e was added for 2 h. Cells were then treated<br />

with 10% ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for 5 m<strong>in</strong> and washed<br />

twice with 5% TCA and then with cold ethanol. The cellular layer was<br />

dissolved <strong>in</strong> 0.3 ml <strong>of</strong> 0.3 M NaOH, aliquots were taken for count<strong>in</strong>g<br />

radioactivity, and [ 3 H]-thymid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>in</strong>to DNA was<br />

calculated.<br />

2.5. Assessment <strong>of</strong> cell proliferation<br />

Cells were grown until sub-confluence and then treated with<br />

various compounds for 24 h as <strong>in</strong>dicated. At the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubation,<br />

cell proliferation was assayed us<strong>in</strong>g the cell proliferation kit<br />

based on XTT colorimetric assay (Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit<br />

Haemek, Israel).<br />

2.6. Assessment <strong>of</strong> cell death and detection <strong>of</strong> apoptosis and<br />

necrosis<br />

Cells were grown until sub-confluence and then treated with<br />

various compounds for 24 h as <strong>in</strong>dicated. At the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubation,<br />

photometric enzyme-immunoassay for the quantitative<br />

<strong>in</strong> vitro determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> cytoplasmic histone-associated-DNAfragments<br />

(mono- and oligo-nucleosomes) after <strong>in</strong>duced cell death<br />

was assayed us<strong>in</strong>g Cell Death Detection ELISA plus kit from Roche<br />

kit Molecular Biochemicals. This is a “sandwich” assay constructed<br />

to identify DNA fragments through the use <strong>of</strong> two antibodies, one<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st histones and the second directed aga<strong>in</strong>st DNA. Cell necrosis<br />

was also assayed at the end <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cubation by measur<strong>in</strong>g lactic<br />

dehydrogense (LDH) activity released to the culture medium from<br />

the cytoplasm <strong>of</strong> dis<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g cells us<strong>in</strong>g a standard commercial<br />

LDH assay (Advia Centaur, Siemens).<br />

2.7. Assessment <strong>of</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ase specific activity<br />

Cells were grown until sub-confluence, treated for 24 h with the<br />

various hormones as specified, and were then collected and homogenized<br />

<strong>in</strong> an extraction buffer as previously described. Supernatant<br />

extracts were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by centrifugation <strong>of</strong> homogenates at<br />

14,000 × g for 5 m<strong>in</strong> at 4 ◦ C <strong>in</strong> an Eppendorf micro centrifuge.<br />

Creat<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ase activity (CK) was assayed by a coupled spectrophotometric<br />

assay (17). Prote<strong>in</strong> was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by Coomassie blue dye<br />

b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g bov<strong>in</strong>e serum album<strong>in</strong> (BSA) as the standard.<br />

2.8. Statistical analysis<br />

Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Differences between the<br />

mean values obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the experimental and the control<br />

groups were evaluated by analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA). A p value<br />

less than 0.05, was considered significant.<br />

3. Results<br />

3.1. Effect <strong>of</strong> E2 and specific ER˛ and ERˇ agonists and<br />

antagonists on DNA-synthesis and CK activity <strong>in</strong> the human<br />

<strong>medullary</strong> thyroid cancer TT cell l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

ER� mRNA was significantly more abundant than ER� <strong>in</strong><br />

the TT cell l<strong>in</strong>e, with a ratio <strong>of</strong> 48:1 (Fig. 1a). E2 elicited a


258 Y. Greenman et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 132 (2012) 256– 261<br />

Fig. 1. Estradiol-17(, ER� and ER� agonists stimulate DNA synthesis and CK activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma cell l<strong>in</strong>e TT. (a) ER� and ER� mRNA expression <strong>in</strong><br />

cultured human TT cells; (b) effect <strong>of</strong> treatment (24 h) with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g concentrations <strong>of</strong> estradiol-17� (E2) on DNA synthesis, *p < 0.05; (c) effect <strong>of</strong> MPP (ER� antagonist)<br />

and PTHPP (ER� antagonist) on the stimulatory effect <strong>of</strong> E2, DPN (ER� agonist) and PPT (ER� agonist) on DNA synthesis, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 for the difference between<br />

hormonal treated and control treated cells; # p < 0.05 for the difference between hormone + antagonist treated and hormonal treated cells; and (d) <strong>effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> raloxifene on E2-,<br />

DPN- and PPT-<strong>in</strong>duced changes <strong>in</strong> CK specific activity, *p < 0.05 for the difference between hormonal treated and control treated cells; # p < 0.05 for the difference between<br />

hormone + Ral treated and hormonal treated cells.<br />

dose-dependent <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> DNA synthesis <strong>in</strong> TT cells as assessed by<br />

[ 3 H]-thymid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>corporation (Fig. 1b). Stimulation <strong>of</strong> proliferation<br />

occurred even at low concentrations <strong>of</strong> E2, which are equivalent to<br />

physiological E2 levels <strong>in</strong> adult females (0.3–3 nM). The ER� agonist<br />

DPN at low concentration (42 nM) stimulated [ 3 H]-thymid<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporation by 68% (similar to the extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> DNA<br />

synthesis achieved with E2 at similar concentration). Incubation<br />

with higher concentrations <strong>of</strong> DPN had no effect on cell proliferation.<br />

In contrast, <strong>in</strong>cubation <strong>of</strong> TT cells with a low concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ER� agonist PPT (39 nM) had no effect, but at higher concentrations<br />

(390 nM) this agent caused a significant stimulation <strong>of</strong><br />

[ 3 H]-thymid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>corporation (data not shown). Consequently, all<br />

subsequent experiments as described below were performed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

DPN concentration <strong>of</strong> 42 nM and PPT concentration <strong>of</strong> 390 nM. The<br />

stimulatory effect <strong>of</strong> E2 (30 nM) on DNA synthesis was attenuated<br />

by co-<strong>in</strong>cubation <strong>of</strong> either the ER� specific antagonist MPP<br />

(150 nM) or the ER� specific antagonist PTHPP (150 nM), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that the estrogen <strong>in</strong>duced proliferation <strong>in</strong> these cells is mediated by<br />

both ER� and ER� (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, the stimulatory effect <strong>of</strong><br />

the ER� agonist DPN on cell proliferation was more robustly <strong>in</strong>hibited<br />

by co-<strong>in</strong>cubation with the ER� antagonist PTHPP, than with<br />

MPP. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, ER� mediated DNA synthesis by PPT was mostly<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibited by the specific ER� antagonist MPP (Fig. 1c). Nuclear<br />

receptor-dependent estrogenic activity, as measured by creat<strong>in</strong>e<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ase specific activity (CK activity), was significantly stimulated<br />

by E2 (30 nM), DPN (42 nM) and PPT (390 nM, Fig. 1d). Incubation<br />

with the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) Raloxifene<br />

(Ral, 3 �M) that has tissue specific stimulatory or <strong>in</strong>hibitory activities,<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced CK activity <strong>in</strong> TT cells (Fig. 1d). On the other hand, Ral<br />

blocked E 2 and PPT but not DPN stimulation <strong>of</strong> CK activity, reflect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

its predom<strong>in</strong>ant antagonism <strong>of</strong> ER� over ER� (Fig. 1d). These<br />

results <strong>in</strong>dicate that despite the more pronounced mRNA expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> ER� <strong>in</strong> TT cells, both receptor is<strong>of</strong>orms significantly mediate<br />

E2 <strong>in</strong>duced proliferation <strong>in</strong> these cells.<br />

3.2. Effect <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc on human TT cell l<strong>in</strong>e growth and survival<br />

<strong>in</strong> vitro<br />

cD-tBoc significantly <strong>in</strong>hibited DNA synthesis <strong>in</strong> cultured TT<br />

cells <strong>in</strong> a dose dependent manner rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.0312 to 3.120 �M<br />

(Fig. 2a). Similar <strong>in</strong>hibitory <strong>effects</strong> were observed when cell proliferation<br />

was assessed by the XTT assay, with maximal suppression <strong>of</strong><br />

proliferation (70%) achieved at cD-tBoc concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.312 �M<br />

(not shown). Furthermore, cD-tBoc (3.12 �M) completely abrogated<br />

the <strong>proliferative</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> E2, as well as <strong>of</strong> the ER� agonist<br />

DPN, but not <strong>of</strong> the ER� agonist MPP (Fig. 2b). Concordant with<br />

this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g, the cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>hibitory effect on [ 3 H]-thymid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>corporation<br />

could be blocked by PTHPP (anti-ER�) but not with MPP<br />

(anti-ER�), suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the anti<strong>proliferative</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc<br />

on these cells is mediated through ER� (Fig. 2c). F<strong>in</strong>ally, basal CK<br />

activity, as well as E2 and DPN (but no PPT) stimulated CK activity<br />

was suppressed by co-treatment with cD-tBoc (Fig. 2d). Fig. 3<br />

depicts actual photographs <strong>of</strong> control and treated TT cells respond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to this compound. Shown photographs were obta<strong>in</strong>ed follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

24 h <strong>of</strong> culture with vehicle (Fig. 3a) or with cD-tBoc at 3 (Fig. 3b),<br />

30 (Fig. 3c) and 300 nM (Fig. 3d).<br />

3.3. cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>duces thyroid cancer cell death through the<br />

<strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> apoptosis and necrosis<br />

cD-tBoc potently <strong>in</strong>creased apoptosis (1350–1750% stimulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> histone–DNA fragments), with the maximal effect be<strong>in</strong>g


Y. Greenman et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 132 (2012) 256– 261 259<br />

Fig. 2. cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>hibits basal as well as E2 and ER� agonist stimulated DNA synthesis <strong>in</strong> TT cells. (a) Effect <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc on basal DNA synthesis <strong>in</strong> cultured human TT cells,<br />

*p < 0.05 for the difference between hormonal treated and control treated cells; (b) effect <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc on E2, DPN and PPT stimulated DNA synthesis <strong>in</strong> cultured human TT cells<br />

(% <strong>of</strong> control, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01); (c) effect <strong>of</strong> co-treatment with ER� antagonist (MPP) or ER� antagonist (PTHPP) on cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>of</strong> DNA synthesis, *p < 0.05;<br />

**p < 0.01 for the difference between cD-tBoc treated and control treated cells; # p < 0.05 for the difference between cD-tBoc + antagonist treated and cD-tBoc treated cells;<br />

and (d) effect <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc on E2, DPN and PPT <strong>in</strong>duced CK activity <strong>in</strong> cultured human TT cells (% <strong>of</strong> control), *p < 0.05; # p < 0.05 for the difference between cD-tBoc + antagonist<br />

treated and cD-tBoc treated cells.<br />

Fig. 3. Effect <strong>of</strong> different doses <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc on the morphology <strong>of</strong> cultured human TT cells (×20). (a) No treatment; (b) cD-tBoc 0.0312 �M; (c) cD-tBoc 0.312 �M; and (d)<br />

cD-tBoc 3.12 �M.


260 Y. Greenman et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 132 (2012) 256– 261<br />

Fig. 4. cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>duces thyroid cancer TT cell death through the <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> apoptosis and necrosis. (a) Effect <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc on apoptotic cell death <strong>in</strong> cultured TT cell l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

as assessed by the detection <strong>of</strong> histone–DNA fragments, p < 0.001; (b) effect <strong>of</strong> the general apoptosis <strong>in</strong>hibitor ZV on the <strong>in</strong>hibitory effect <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc on DNA synthesis <strong>in</strong><br />

cultured human TT cells, *p < 0.05 for the difference between cD-tBoc treated and control treated cells and # p < 0.05 for the difference <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc treated + ZV compared to<br />

cD-tBoc treated alone; (c) effect <strong>of</strong> ZV on cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>of</strong> CK activity, *p < 0.05 for the difference between cD-tBoc treated and control treated cells and # p < 0.05 for the<br />

difference <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc treated + ZV compared to cD-tBoc treated alone; and (d) effect <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc on LDH activity, reflect<strong>in</strong>g cell necrosis <strong>in</strong> cultured human TT cells, *p < 0.05<br />

for the difference between cD-tBoc treated and control treated cells.<br />

already achieved at the lowest concentration tested (0.0312 �M)<br />

(Fig. 4a). Co-<strong>in</strong>cubation with the antiapoptotic agent ZV (Z-VAD-<br />

FMK) reversed the growth <strong>in</strong>hibitory effect elicited by cD-tBoc<br />

as measured by thymid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>corporation (Fig. 4b), and CK activity<br />

(Fig. 4c), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that cD-tBoc-<strong>in</strong>duced apoptosis is a major<br />

mechanism through which this compound retards growth <strong>in</strong> the<br />

TT cell l<strong>in</strong>e. F<strong>in</strong>ally, cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>creased TT cell release <strong>of</strong> LDH by<br />

67% (Fig. 4d), reflect<strong>in</strong>g cell necrosis and thus <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that this<br />

is another pathway by which this compound <strong>in</strong>hibits cell proliferation.<br />

4. Discussion<br />

An <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> calciton<strong>in</strong> secretion by normal thyroid C-cells as<br />

a result <strong>of</strong> estrogen stimulation has been demonstrated <strong>in</strong> vitro<br />

[18] as well as <strong>in</strong> animal models [19] and humans [20], thus suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> estrogen receptors <strong>in</strong> these cells. Normal<br />

[21] and hyperplastic C-cells [22] have been shown by immunocytochemistry<br />

to express exclusively ER�. This predom<strong>in</strong>ant ER�<br />

expression has been described <strong>in</strong>itially for <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

samples as well [23], but subsequently ER� has been detected<br />

<strong>in</strong> most MTC samples by immunosta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g different antibodies<br />

[23], or by RT-PCR [4]. In fact, as measured by quantitative<br />

real time RT-PCR, MTC samples had higher expression levels <strong>of</strong><br />

ER� mRNA than ER� mRNA, <strong>in</strong> equivalent levels to those found<br />

<strong>in</strong> normal thyroid tissue [4]. Although estrogen receptor expression<br />

has been clearly demonstrated previously <strong>in</strong> TT cells [24], here<br />

we show that ER� is the predom<strong>in</strong>ant mRNA is<strong>of</strong>orm expressed <strong>in</strong><br />

these cells. Furthermore, our results <strong>in</strong>dicate that both specific ER�<br />

and ER� agonists stimulate DNA synthesis and CK activity, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased TT cell proliferation. This effect was receptor specific<br />

as MPP, an ER� antagonist, blocked the <strong>effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ER�-specific<br />

PPT agonist, whereas PTHPP, an ER� antagonist, blocked the <strong>proliferative</strong><br />

<strong>effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ER�-specific DPN agonist. Hence, despite<br />

the more pronounced mRNA expression <strong>of</strong> ER� <strong>in</strong> TT cells, both<br />

receptor is<strong>of</strong>orms significantly mediated E2 <strong>in</strong>duced proliferation<br />

<strong>in</strong> these cells.<br />

Our results are <strong>in</strong> contrast with those <strong>of</strong> Cho et al., who reported<br />

opposite <strong>effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> ER� (stimulatory) and ER� (<strong>in</strong>hibitory) on cell<br />

proliferation and apoptosis <strong>of</strong> TT cells [24]. A possible explanation<br />

to this discrepancy it that the TT cell l<strong>in</strong>e stra<strong>in</strong> used by<br />

these authors had no endogenous ER receptor expression and that<br />

proliferation studies were performed follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>of</strong> these<br />

cells with adenoviral vectors carry<strong>in</strong>g the either the human ER�<br />

or the ER� receptor, thus creat<strong>in</strong>g a more artificial experimental<br />

paradigm.<br />

Another important f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the present study is that a synthetic<br />

<strong>derivative</strong> <strong>of</strong> the is<strong>of</strong>lavone daidze<strong>in</strong>, cD-tBoc, potently<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibited TT-cell proliferation, through the <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> both cell<br />

apoptosis and necrosis. The exact mechanisms by which this compound<br />

exerts its anti-tumoral <strong>effects</strong> have not been clarified yet<br />

although our results po<strong>in</strong>t to a predom<strong>in</strong>ant mediat<strong>in</strong>g effect <strong>of</strong><br />

ER�. This hypothesis is supported by our data show<strong>in</strong>g abrogation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the anti<strong>proliferative</strong> <strong>effects</strong> if cD-tBoc by a specific ER� antagonist<br />

but not by an ER� antagonist. Furthermore, cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>hibited<br />

TT-cell proliferation <strong>in</strong>duced by an ER� agonist but not by and<br />

ER� agonist. F<strong>in</strong>ally, daidze<strong>in</strong>, the parent compound <strong>of</strong> cD-tBoc<br />

has been shown to have a greater aff<strong>in</strong>ity for ER� [25]. Our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

support recent data published by our group suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

cD-tBoc <strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>of</strong> proliferation <strong>of</strong> the follicular thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

cell l<strong>in</strong>e WRO and <strong>of</strong> the anaplastic thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma cell<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e ARO is mediated by ER� [26]. Nevertheless, <strong>in</strong> TT cell l<strong>in</strong>es,


Y. Greenman et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 132 (2012) 256– 261 261<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>of</strong> proliferation was achieved through pathways lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to both apoptosis and necrosis, while <strong>in</strong> WRO and ARO cell<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es, cell death occurred through apoptosis only [26]. Clearly further<br />

work is needed to dissect the pathways through which this<br />

<strong>novel</strong> compound exerts its antitumoral <strong>effects</strong>.<br />

In conclusion, our results suggest that estrogens are <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

<strong>in</strong> proliferation <strong>of</strong> the human MTC cell l<strong>in</strong>e TT, and that this property<br />

can be utilized to design promis<strong>in</strong>g anti-cancer drugs for the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma.<br />

Conflict <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

All authors declare that there are no actual or potential conflicts<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial, personal or other relationships<br />

with other people or organizations that could have <strong>in</strong>appropriately<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenced this work.<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> the fund<strong>in</strong>g source<br />

This work did not receive f<strong>in</strong>ancial support by any specific sponsor<br />

or grant.<br />

References<br />

[1] A. Machens, S. Hauptmann, H. Dralle, Disparities between male and female<br />

patients with thyroid cancers: sex differences or gender divide? Cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 65 (2006) 500–505.<br />

[2] I. Dos Santos Silva, A.J. Swerdlow, Sex differences <strong>in</strong> the risks <strong>of</strong> hormonedependent<br />

cancers, American Journal <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology 138 (1993) 10–28.<br />

[3] H. Inoue, K. Oshimo, H. Miki, M. Kawano, Y. Monden, Immunohistochemical<br />

study <strong>of</strong> estrogen receptors and the responsiveness to estrogen <strong>in</strong> papillary<br />

thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma, Cancer 72 (1993) 1364–1368.<br />

[4] C. Egawa, Y. Miyoshi, K. Iwao, E. Shiba, S. Noguchi, Quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta messenger RNA expression <strong>in</strong> normal and<br />

malignant thyroid tissues by real-time polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction, Oncology 61<br />

(2001) 293–298.<br />

[5] D. Manole, B. Schildknecht, B. Gosnell, E. Adams, M. Derwahl, Estrogen<br />

promotes growth <strong>of</strong> human thyroid tumor cells by different molecular mechanisms,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology and Metabolism 89 (2001) 1072–1077.<br />

[6] S. Rajoria, R. Suriano, A. Shanmugam, Y.L. Wilson, S.P. Schantz, J. Geliebter, R.K.<br />

Tiwari, Metastatic phenotype is regulated by estrogen <strong>in</strong> thyroid cells, Thyroid<br />

20 (2010) 33–41.<br />

[7] S. Guyetant, M.C. Rousselet, M. Durigon, D. Chappard, B. Franc, O. Guer<strong>in</strong>, J.P.<br />

Sa<strong>in</strong>t-Andre, Sex-related C cell hyperplasia <strong>in</strong> the normal human thyroid: a<br />

quantitative autopsy study, Journal <strong>of</strong> Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology and Metabolism<br />

82 (1997) 42–47.<br />

[8] M. d’Herbomez, P. Caron, C. Bauters, C.D. Cao, J.L. Schlienger, R. Sap<strong>in</strong>, L. Baldet,<br />

B. Carnaille, J.L. Wémeau, French Group GTE (Groupe des Tumeurs Endocr<strong>in</strong>es):<br />

reference range <strong>of</strong> serum calciton<strong>in</strong> levels <strong>in</strong> humans: <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> calciton<strong>in</strong><br />

assays, sex, age, and cigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g, European Journal <strong>of</strong> Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology/European<br />

Federation <strong>of</strong> Endocr<strong>in</strong>e Societies 157 (2007) 749–755.<br />

[9] A. Machens, F. H<strong>of</strong>fman, C. Sekulla, H. Dralle, Importance <strong>of</strong> gender-specific<br />

calciton<strong>in</strong> thresholds <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g for occult sporadic <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid cancer,<br />

Endocr<strong>in</strong>e Related Cancer 16 (2009) 1291–1298.<br />

[10] E. Kebebew, P.H. Ituarte, A.E. Siperste<strong>in</strong>, Q.Y. Duh, O.H. Clark, Medullary thyroid<br />

carc<strong>in</strong>oma: cl<strong>in</strong>ical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> stag<strong>in</strong>g systems, Cancer 88 (2000) 1139–1148.<br />

[11] E. Modigliani, R. Cohen, J.M. Campos, B. Conte-Devolx, B. Maes, A. Boneu, M.<br />

Schlumberger, J.C. Bigorgne, P. Dumontier, L. Leclerc, B. Corcuff, I. Guilhem, the<br />

GETC Study Group, Prognostic factors for survival and for biochemical cure <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma: results <strong>in</strong> 899 patients, Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology<br />

48 (1998) 265–273.<br />

[12] S. Schröder, W. Böcker, H. Baisch, C.G. Bürk, H. Arps, I. Me<strong>in</strong>ers, H. Kastendieck,<br />

P.U. Heitz, Klöppel, Prognostic factors <strong>in</strong> <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>omas. Survival<br />

<strong>in</strong> relation to age, sex, stage, histology, immunocytochemistry, and DNA<br />

content, Cancer 61 (1988) 806–816.<br />

[13] N. Bhattacharyya, A population-based analysis <strong>of</strong> survival factors <strong>in</strong> differentiated<br />

and <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery<br />

128 (2003) 115–123.<br />

[14] S. Roman, R. L<strong>in</strong>, J.A. Sosa, Prognosis <strong>of</strong> <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma: demographic,<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical and pathological predictors <strong>of</strong> survival <strong>in</strong> 1252 cases, Cancer<br />

107 (2006) 2134–2142.<br />

[15] American Thyroid Association Guidel<strong>in</strong>es Task ForceR.T. Kloos, C. Eng, D.B.<br />

Evans, G.L. Francis, R.F. Gagel, H. Gharib, J.F. Moley, F. Pac<strong>in</strong>i, M.D. R<strong>in</strong>gel, M.<br />

Schlumberger, S.A. Wells Jr., Medullary thyroid cancer: management guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

<strong>of</strong> the American Thyroid Association, Thyroid 19 (2009) 565–612.<br />

[16] M. Cakir, A.B. Grossman, Medullary thyroid cancer: molecular biology and <strong>novel</strong><br />

molecular therapies, Neuroendocr<strong>in</strong>ology 90 (2009) 323–348.<br />

[17] F. Kohen, B. Gayer, T. Kulik, V. Frydman, N. Nevo, S. Katzburg, R. Limor, O. Sharon,<br />

N. Stern, D. Somjen, Synthesis and evaluation <strong>of</strong> the anti<strong>proliferative</strong> activities<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>derivative</strong>s <strong>of</strong> carboxyalkyl is<strong>of</strong>lavones l<strong>in</strong>ked to N-t-Boc-hexylenediam<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>al Chemistry 50 (2007) 6405–6410.<br />

[18] G.A. Williams, S.C. Kukreja, E.N. Bowser, G.K. Hargis, C.P. Greenberg, W.J. Henderson,<br />

Prolonged effect <strong>of</strong> estradiol on calciton<strong>in</strong> secretion, Bone and M<strong>in</strong>eral<br />

1 (1986) 415–420.<br />

[19] T. Naveh-many, G. Almogi, N. Livni, J. Silver, Estrogen receptors and biologic<br />

response <strong>in</strong> rat parathyroid tissue and C cells, Journal <strong>of</strong> Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Investigation<br />

90 (1992) 2434–2438.<br />

[20] M.I. Whitehead, G. Lane, P.T. Townsend, G. Abeyasekera, C.J. Hillyard, J.C.<br />

Stevenson, Effects <strong>in</strong> postmenopausal women <strong>of</strong> natural and synthetic estrogens<br />

on calciton<strong>in</strong> and calcium-regulat<strong>in</strong>g hormone secretion. Relevance to<br />

postmenopausal osteoporosis, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scand<strong>in</strong>avica<br />

Supplement 106 (1981) 27–32.<br />

[21] A.H. Taylor, F. Al-Azzawi, Immunolocalisation <strong>of</strong> oestrogen receptor<br />

beta <strong>in</strong> human tissues, Journal <strong>of</strong> Molecular Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 24 (2000)<br />

145–155.<br />

[22] C. Bléchet, P. Lecomte, L. De Calan, P. Beutter, S.S. Guyétant, Expression <strong>of</strong> sex<br />

steroid hormone receptors <strong>in</strong> C cell hyperplasia and <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma,<br />

Virchows Archiv 450 (2007) 433–439.<br />

[23] A.M. Cho, M.K. Lee, K.H. Nam, W.Y. Chung, C.S. Park, J.H. Lee, T. Noh, W.I. Yang,<br />

Y. Rhee, S.K. Lim, H.C. Lee, E.J. Lee, Expression and role <strong>of</strong> estrogen receptor<br />

a and b <strong>in</strong> <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma: different roles <strong>in</strong> cancer growth and<br />

apoptosis, Journal <strong>of</strong> Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 195 (2007) 255–263.<br />

[24] K. Yang, C.E. Pearson, N.A. Samaan, Estrogen receptor and hormone responsiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>medullary</strong> thyroid carc<strong>in</strong>oma cells <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous culture, Cancer<br />

Research 48 (1988) 2760–2763.<br />

[25] G.G.J.M. Kuiper, J.G. Lemmen, B. Carlsson, J.C. Corton, S.H. Safe, P.T. van der Saag,<br />

B. van der Burg, J.Å. Gustafsson, Interaction <strong>of</strong> estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens<br />

with estrogen receptor �, Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 139 (1998) 4252–4263.<br />

[26] D. Somjen, M. Grafi-Cohen, S. Katzburg, G. Weis<strong>in</strong>ger, E. Izkhakov, N. Nevo,<br />

O. Sharon, Z. Kraiem, F. Kohen, N. Stern, <strong>Anti</strong>-thyroid cancer properties <strong>of</strong> a<br />

<strong>novel</strong> is<strong>of</strong>lavone <strong>derivative</strong> 7-(O)-carboxymethyl daidze<strong>in</strong> conjugated to N-t-<br />

Boc-hexylenediam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo, Journal <strong>of</strong> Steroid Biochemistry and<br />

Molecular Biology 126 (2011) 95–103.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!