20.02.2013 Views

Recycled - Today's Machining World

Recycled - Today's Machining World

Recycled - Today's Machining World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

john batiste<br />

36<br />

you could get.<br />

LG: In what respect?<br />

JB: I was in Kosovo for 14 months, Turkey for four<br />

months, and Iraq for 13 months in that period working<br />

hard. There could be no wasted effort. There was no<br />

room for inefficiency because we were too busy.<br />

LG: Tell me about the chain of command in the<br />

military versus the chain of command as it’s practiced<br />

today by you and the company you work for.<br />

JB: There was a misconception at Klein Steel before I<br />

got here that I would be all about command and control,<br />

be very centralized and domineering and be very dictato-<br />

rial. Nothing could be further from the truth. In the<br />

Army, the good units are very decentralized. There’s lots<br />

of input from subordinates. Great units are decentralized<br />

and leaders are not afraid of subordinates making mis-<br />

takes because that’s how they learn. So my techniques<br />

today are precisely the same as they were when I was<br />

the Commanding General of the 1st Infantry Division.<br />

I value input. I want dissent. At some point there’s a<br />

decision made and then we all go do it, but up until that<br />

point there’s a freewheeling discussion, and during the<br />

execution of a mission it’s always decentralized to the<br />

lowest level. You give your subordinates what they need<br />

to accomplish the mission and you get out of the way.<br />

NG: What’s the difference between the Army and<br />

civilian business?<br />

JB: The biggest difference, and this is something that’s<br />

getting better and better at Klein Steel, is the element of<br />

discipline. That is to say, once a decision is made people<br />

proceed in that direction whether they agree with it or<br />

not. In private business that’s not always true. Talking<br />

to my peers in business in Rochester, there’s a tendency<br />

far beyond the decision point for passive aggressive be-<br />

havior. The challenge of leaders is to figure out where this<br />

is going on, who the resisters are, and get rid of them.<br />

LG: It strikes me that in the military, at least out in the<br />

field, you have to have built-in redundancies because<br />

people get hurt; they get killed; they leave. In lean manufacturing,<br />

one of the problems is lack of redundancy.<br />

JB: You’re exactly right. There were multiple levels of<br />

redundancy in the military where you could plug them in<br />

all very quickly. In lean manufacturing, one person could<br />

make a huge difference if he or she is sick. Klein Steel is a<br />

very lean organization. As a Commanding Officer, I had<br />

a personal staff and another dozen consultants, from<br />

security people to cooks to take care of things. I don’t have<br />

any of that right now. It’s a lean organization in every<br />

respect. That was something I had to get used to.<br />

LG: Do you think that’s necessarily good?<br />

JB: It’s not bad.<br />

LG: There’s a guru I’ve listened to a lot who always<br />

said, “Frank Sinatra didn’t move pianos.” The idea<br />

is that you should do what you do well and let other<br />

people fill in the holes.<br />

JB: I certainly delegate as much as I can. At the<br />

moment I’m doing my own schedule, my own calendar,<br />

and answer my own phone. I think that’s okay; that<br />

communicates to people that Klein Steel still has an<br />

entrepreneurial ethos. It’s not extravagant. It’s not<br />

spending money where it doesn’t need to.<br />

“You give your subordinates what<br />

they need to accomplish the mis-<br />

sion and you get out of the way.”<br />

LG: Political question: Do we really want to find<br />

Osama bin Laden and kill him?<br />

JB: Gosh, it would’ve been nice to get him in Tora Bora<br />

back in 2003.<br />

LG: What I’m really getting at is, isn’t he a convenient<br />

symbol of terrorism?<br />

JB: Sure, he’s nothing but a symbol, and he would be<br />

replaced multi-times over. You’ve got to remember,<br />

Al-Qaeda is a very decentralized organization. There<br />

are plenty of Osama bin Ladens out there. His legacy is<br />

going to live on whether he’s alive or dead.<br />

NG: Is he a uniter for terrorists?<br />

JB: Sure he is. But again, he’s going to unite whether<br />

he’s alive or dead. Do I think we need to get him? Yes,<br />

and I think that we diluted the main effort when we went<br />

into Iraq.<br />

Today’s <strong>Machining</strong> <strong>World</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!