21.02.2013 Views

D2.1 Stakeholder Involvement Handbook - AENEAS

D2.1 Stakeholder Involvement Handbook - AENEAS

D2.1 Stakeholder Involvement Handbook - AENEAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>D2.1</strong> <strong>Stakeholder</strong> <strong>Involvement</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />

How is it used with other techniques?<br />

Questionnaires can be very useful in supporting other techniques. Survey results can, for<br />

example, provide useful data and support for focus groups or workshops and questionnaires<br />

can be used to identify individuals who would like to get involved in more engagement<br />

activities.<br />

What are the drawbacks?<br />

Some questionnaires receive poor response rates and incentives may be required to<br />

encourage people to return their questionnaires. Used in isolation, ‘closed’ questionnaires do<br />

not produce in-depth information and may not fully identify key issues or problems.<br />

Questionnaires will not be appropriate for some stakeholders, e.g. those with low literacy<br />

levels. All written documents should have an adequate font size (12pt. if possible) and good<br />

contrasts of colours in order to enhance readability.<br />

More information can be found in GUIDEMAPS, stakeholder engagement handbook, Vol. 2.<br />

8.2 Public meetings, roundtables and workshops<br />

A public meeting is one of the most common forms<br />

of public engagement. At a meeting, there is an<br />

opportunity to both inform participants and to receive<br />

input from the community.<br />

Such events, however, may have quite different<br />

formats, depending on the aims and purposes.<br />

Selection of the appropriate format and good<br />

preparation are therefore keys to success – whether<br />

or not working with older people. In addition, such<br />

events may constitute quite different levels of<br />

involvement (see ladder of involvement, chapter 5)<br />

– from mere information to real participation in<br />

decisions.<br />

Selected formats (non exhaustive)<br />

• Information Meeting: This is the most common, but least interactive format. On the<br />

one hand, it is quite easily prepared and you may reach a large number of people.<br />

On the other hand, people might get opposed since they do not really feel being<br />

involved, other they may not even show up.<br />

• Roundtable: A format that is particularly adequate for smaller, “semi-public” groups<br />

meeting regularly to discuss specific issues. This format could be your choice if you<br />

want to join different stakeholders who are represented by only one or two<br />

representatives each.<br />

• Workshop: To be honest, literally everything can be named workshop. However,<br />

what we have in mind here are events where citizens and planners (and other<br />

stakeholders) work together on specific issues, using tools like role plays or case<br />

studies among others.<br />

• Coffee Party: A rather informal format, fostering exchange and building contacts in<br />

an open atmosphere. It could, however, become difficult to follow a special agenda<br />

in such an environment. On the other hand, personal exchange and feedback is<br />

enhanced. Also a good icebreaker when starting to get to know each other.<br />

Meetings such as these can enable group discussion on proposals and will help to reassure<br />

the public that its voice is being heard. Public meetings may also be appropriate when trying<br />

Page 20<br />

Green City

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!