22.02.2013 Views

1 Introduction - Caltech High Energy Physics - California Institute of ...

1 Introduction - Caltech High Energy Physics - California Institute of ...

1 Introduction - Caltech High Energy Physics - California Institute of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

42 Rare Decays<br />

analyses [134, 51, 131, 139]:<br />

m pole<br />

c /m pole<br />

b ⇒ m MS<br />

c (µ)/m pole<br />

b , µ ∈ [mc,mb]. (2.30)<br />

Numerically, the shift from mpole c /m pole<br />

b =0.29 ± 0.02 to mMS c (µ)/m pole<br />

b =0.22 ± 0.04 is rather important<br />

and leads to a +11% shift <strong>of</strong> the central value <strong>of</strong> the B → Xsγ branching ratio. Since the matrix element<br />

starts at NLL order and, thus, the renormalization scheme for mc is an NNLL issue, one should regard the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> the MS scheme as an educated guess <strong>of</strong> the NNLL corrections. Nevertheless, the new choice is<br />

guided by the experience gained from many higher order calculations in perturbation theory. Moreover, the<br />

MS mass <strong>of</strong> the charm quark is also a short-distance quantity which does not suffer from nonperturbative<br />

ambiguities, in contrast to its pole mass. Therefore the central value resulting within this scheme is definitely<br />

favored. However, one has to argue for a theoretical uncertainty in mMS c (µ)/m pole<br />

b , which also includes the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> mpole c . This is done in the above theoretical predictions by using a large asymmetric error in mc/mb<br />

that fully covers any value <strong>of</strong> mc/mb compatible with any <strong>of</strong> these two determinations:<br />

mc<br />

mb<br />

=0.23 +0.08<br />

−0.05 . (2.31)<br />

The dominant uncertainty due to the renormalization scheme dependence is a perturbative error that could<br />

be significantly reduced by a NNLL QCD calculation. Such a calculation would also further reduce the scale<br />

uncertainty given in the theoretical predictions above. Needless to say, the parametric error can also be<br />

further reduced by independent experiments. Thus, a theoretical error around 5% seems possible. At that<br />

stage a further study <strong>of</strong> the nonperturbative corrections seems to be appropriate in order to make sure that<br />

they are under control at this level <strong>of</strong> accuracy.<br />

The uncertainty regarding the fraction <strong>of</strong> the B → Xsγ events above the chosen lower photon energy cut-<strong>of</strong>f<br />

Eγ quoted in the experimental measurement, also <strong>of</strong>ten cited as model dependence, should be regarded as<br />

a purely theoretical uncertainty: in contrast to the ‘total’ branching ratio <strong>of</strong> B → Xsγ, the photon energy<br />

spectrum cannot be calculated directly using the heavy mass expansion, because the OPE breaks down in<br />

the high-energy part <strong>of</strong> the spectrum, where Eγ ≈ mb/2. However, a partial resummation <strong>of</strong> an infinite<br />

number <strong>of</strong> leading-twist corrections into a nonperturbative universal shape function is possible. At present<br />

this function cannot be calculated, but there is at least some information on the moments <strong>of</strong> the shape<br />

function, which are related to the forward matrix elements <strong>of</strong> local operators. An important observation is<br />

that the shape <strong>of</strong> the photon spectrum is practically insensitive to physics beyond the Standard Model (see<br />

Fig. fig:Toymodel. This implies that we do not have to assume the correctness <strong>of</strong> the Standard Model in the<br />

experimental analysis. A precise measurement <strong>of</strong> the photon spectrum would allow a determination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> the shape function. Moreover, the universality <strong>of</strong> the shape function, valid to lowest order in<br />

ΛQCD/mb, allows us to compare information from the endpoint region <strong>of</strong> the B → Xsγ photon spectrum<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the B → Xuℓν charged-lepton spectrum up to higher 1/mb corrections. Thus, one <strong>of</strong> the main aims<br />

in the future should therefore be a precise measurement <strong>of</strong> the photon spectrum. It is clear, that a lower<br />

experimental cut in the photon spectrum within the measurement <strong>of</strong> B → Xsγ decreases the sensitivity to<br />

the parameters <strong>of</strong> the shape function and that the ideal energy cut would be 1.6 GeV. In this case, however,<br />

a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the BB background is necessary. In the last Belle measurement the photon cut<br />

was already pushed to 1.8 GeV [48].<br />

The important role <strong>of</strong> the B → Xsγ decay in the search for New <strong>Physics</strong> cannot be overemphasized (for a<br />

recent review, see [41]), as it already leads to stringent bounds on various supersymmetric extensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Standard Model (see for example [56, 57, 140, 141, 142, 143]). Also, in the long run, after New <strong>Physics</strong> has<br />

been discovered via the direct search, this inclusive decay mode will play an even more important role in<br />

analyzing in greater detail the new underlying dynamics.<br />

The Discovery Potential <strong>of</strong> a Super B Factory

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!