25.02.2013 Views

A Handbook for Measuring Employee Performance - Office of ...

A Handbook for Measuring Employee Performance - Office of ...

A Handbook for Measuring Employee Performance - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT<br />

Additional per<strong>for</strong>mance elements were introduced in the September 1995 per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

appraisal regulations and have not been used widely yet. We <strong>for</strong>esee their popularity<br />

rising as agencies discover the possibilities they present <strong>for</strong> managing per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

KNOW YOUR PROGRAM FEATURES<br />

Again, it is important to stress that be<strong>for</strong>e you continue with this handbook, you<br />

need to find out the rules established by your appraisal program; specifically , you<br />

will need to know:<br />

❙ which kinds <strong>of</strong> elements your program allows you to use<br />

❙ at how many levels your program appraises employee per<strong>for</strong>mance on elements<br />

❙ how many summary levels your program uses<br />

❙ if your program allows weighting <strong>of</strong> elements (see Step 4)<br />

❙ whether the program requires specific elements and/or uses generic standards<br />

example program features<br />

This handbook uses an example agency called the "Federal Benefits Bureau," (FBB)<br />

which is an agency that specializes in benefits and retirement services. To be able<br />

to understand and work through the examples, you need to know the features <strong>of</strong><br />

FBB's appraisal program (i.e., the same features listed above).<br />

FBB's appraisal program:<br />

❙ uses critical, non-critical, and additional per<strong>for</strong>mance elements<br />

❙ appraises employee per<strong>for</strong>mance on elements at five levels:<br />

Unacceptable<br />

Minimally Successful<br />

Fully Successful<br />

Exceeds Fully Successful<br />

Outstanding<br />

❙ uses five summary levels, which are the same as the elements’ five levels<br />

listed above<br />

❙ allows elements to be weighted according to importance to the organization<br />

❙ requires no specific or generic elements<br />

A HANDBOOK FOR MEASURING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!