27.02.2013 Views

(PVS) Signatures - Tenable Network Security

(PVS) Signatures - Tenable Network Security

(PVS) Signatures - Tenable Network Security

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>PVS</strong> ID: 1355 FAMILY: SNMP Traps RISK: HIGH NESSUS ID:Not Available<br />

Description: Synopsis :\n\nThe remote host is configured with default or easily-guessed<br />

credentials.\n\nThe remote host is running an SNMPv2 server that uses a well-known<br />

community string - write<br />

Solution: This signature was obtained through direct sniffing of the network, so if possible, migrating<br />

systems to SNMP v3 would be more secure. For non-local attacks though, your community<br />

string is easily guessed and should be changed to something more random.<br />

CVE Not available<br />

SNMP all Community String<br />

<strong>PVS</strong> ID: 1356 FAMILY: SNMP Traps RISK: HIGH NESSUS ID:Not Available<br />

Description: Synopsis :\n\nThe remote host is configured with default or easily-guessed<br />

credentials.\n\nThe remote host is running an SNMPv1 server that uses a well-known<br />

community string - all<br />

Solution: This signature was obtained through direct sniffing of the network, so if possible, migrating<br />

systems to SNMP v3 would be more secure. For non-local attacks though, your community<br />

string is easily guessed and should be changed to something more random.<br />

CVE Not available<br />

SNMP all Community String<br />

<strong>PVS</strong> ID: 1357 FAMILY: SNMP Traps RISK: HIGH NESSUS ID:Not Available<br />

Description: Synopsis :\n\nThe remote host is configured with default or easily-guessed<br />

credentials.\n\nThe remote host is running an SNMPv2 server that uses a well-known<br />

community string - all<br />

Solution: This signature was obtained through direct sniffing of the network, so if possible, migrating<br />

systems to SNMP v3 would be more secure. For non-local attacks though, your community<br />

string is easily guessed and should be changed to something more random.<br />

CVE Not available<br />

SNMP Monitor Community String<br />

Passive Vulnerability Scanner (<strong>PVS</strong>) <strong>Signatures</strong><br />

<strong>PVS</strong> ID: 1358 FAMILY: SNMP Traps RISK: HIGH NESSUS ID:Not Available<br />

Description: Synopsis :\n\nThe remote host is configured with default or easily-guessed<br />

credentials.\n\nThe remote host is running an SNMPv1 server that uses a well-known<br />

community string - monitor<br />

Solution: This signature was obtained through direct sniffing of the network, so if possible, migrating<br />

systems to SNMP v3 would be more secure. For non-local attacks though, your community<br />

Family Internet Services 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!