28.02.2013 Views

Buber, Between Man And Man (In) Bb.pdf - PolkFolk

Buber, Between Man And Man (In) Bb.pdf - PolkFolk

Buber, Between Man And Man (In) Bb.pdf - PolkFolk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

education 115<br />

of a tree, or even of an animal or a man, and as it were to trace it<br />

from within, understanding the formation and motoriality of<br />

the object with the perceptions of one’s own muscles; it means<br />

to “transpose” oneself over there and in there. Thus it means the<br />

exclusion of one’s own concreteness, the extinguishing of the<br />

actual situation of life, the absorption in pure æstheticism of the<br />

reality in which one participates. <strong>In</strong>clusion is the opposite of<br />

this. It is the extension of one’s own concreteness, the fulfilment<br />

of the actual situation of life, the complete presence of the reality<br />

in which one participates. Its elements are, first, a relation, of no<br />

matter what kind, between two persons, second, an event<br />

experienced by them in common, in which at least one of them<br />

actively participates, and, third, the fact that this one person,<br />

without forfeiting anything of the felt reality of his activity, at<br />

the same time lives through the common event from the<br />

standpoint of the other.<br />

A relation between persons that is characterized in more<br />

or less degree by the element of inclusion may be termed a<br />

dialogical relation.<br />

A dialogical relation will show itself also in genuine conversation,<br />

but it is not composed of this. Not only is the shared silence<br />

of two such persons a dialogue, but also their dialogical life<br />

continues, even when they are separated in space, as the continual<br />

potential presence of the one to the other, as an<br />

unexpressed intercourse. On the other hand, all conversation<br />

derives its genuineness only from the consciousness of the element<br />

of inclusion—even if this appears only abstractly as an<br />

“acknowledgement” of the actual being of the partner in the<br />

conversation; but this acknowledgement can be real and effective<br />

only when it springs from an experience of inclusion, of the<br />

other side.<br />

The reversal of the will to power and of Eros means that<br />

relations characterized by these are made dialogical. For that<br />

very reason it means that the instinct enters into communion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!