2005 IPSANZ Trade Marks Update - List G Barristers

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Not deceptively similar – words and devices • MCWILLIAMS v (wine) McWilliams Wines Pty Ltd v Darryl Murray Cousins, Adrienne Mary Cousins, Neil Stuart Smith & Joan Smith [2005] ATMO 24 • RED NOSE DAY v (clothing) National SIDS Council of Australia Ltd v Xtreme Sports Importacao Exportacao E Comercio LTDA [2005] ATMO 50
Not deceptively similar - devices v Wiley Publishing Inc v Moondance Pictures Pty Ltd [2004] ATMO 70 v (various goods) (housing design, building (conveyancing services) and sale services) Ownit Homes Pty Ltd v Ownit Conveyancing Pty Ltd [2005] ATMO 47
Page 1 and 2: IPSANZ Trade Marks Update 2005 Ed H
Page 3 and 4: Use of TMs on internet - Ward Group
Page 9 and 10: Counterfeiting and piracy Rip Curl
Page 11 and 12: S 41 - colour TM distinctive: BP gr
Page 13 and 14: S 41 - colour TM distinctive: BP gr
Page 15 and 16: S 41 - shape TM distinctive FreshFo
Page 17 and 18: Section 41 - words not capable of d
Page 19 and 20: S 58 - Proprietorship: Shahin v Exx
Page 21 and 22: S 43 - “DIANA’S LEGACY IN ROSES
Page 23 and 24: Substantially identical • NAGS v
Page 25 and 26: Deceptively similar - Full Federal
Page 27 and 28: Deceptively similar - Federal Magis
Page 29 and 30: Deceptively similar - words • BIC
Page 31 and 32: Deceptively similar - devices (clot
Page 33 and 34: Not deceptively similar - Federal C
Page 35 and 36: Not deceptively similar - Federal C
Page 37 and 38: Not deceptively similar - words •
Page 39: Not deceptively similar - words and
Page 43 and 44: Not similar goods or services • E
Page 45 and 46: S 60 - sufficient reputation • MO
Page 47 and 48: S 60 - insufficient reputation •
Page 49 and 50: S 60 & 42(b) - Cadbury FAVOURITES C
Page 51 and 52: S 42(b) - TM contrary to law - s 52
Page 53 and 54: S 42(b) - TM not contrary to law -
Page 55: S 42(b) - TM not contrary to law -

2005 IPSANZ Trade Marks Update - List G Barristers

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?