02.03.2013 Views

(RoSTI) ANNUAL REPORT 2003 - WIDECAST

(RoSTI) ANNUAL REPORT 2003 - WIDECAST

(RoSTI) ANNUAL REPORT 2003 - WIDECAST

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>RoSTI</strong> Annual Report <strong>2003</strong><br />

Franklin, Byrne and Eckert (2004)<br />

Chart 4. <strong>2003</strong> Documented Activity by Species by Location in Rosalie Bay, Dominica.<br />

25<br />

Number of Activities<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Rosalie Beach La Plaine Beach<br />

Looking more closely at the data reported in Table 3 (indicating a nearly equal number of confirmed and<br />

“suspected” nests, as compared to false crawls), we see that the percentage of “suspected nests” was high<br />

because Rosalie Bay is an area with a significant amount of Leatherback activity. It is difficult and often<br />

impractical to confirm Leatherback nests in comparison to the smaller species of turtles, due to the depth<br />

of the Leatherbacks’ nests and the extent of their disguising activities. The number of confirmed nests<br />

was logically higher at Rosalie Beach, compared with La Plaine, because of the emphasis on night-time<br />

beach patrol at Rosalie Beach and therefore higher rates of encounter with noctural nesting females.<br />

At La Plaine “false crawls” accounted for some 59% of all cases, a figure 10% higher than for Rosalie<br />

Beach (Table 5; Chart 5). The reasons for this most likely reflect physical beach characteristics.<br />

Table 5. <strong>2003</strong> Nesting Results by Beach in Rosalie Bay, Dominica.<br />

Rosalie Beach La Plaine Beach<br />

Number % Number %<br />

Confirmed Nests 08 20.5 02 06.2<br />

Suspected Nests 13 33.3 11 34.4<br />

False Crawls 18 46.2 19 59.4<br />

Total 39 100.00 32 100.00<br />

18<br />

Leatherback<br />

Hawksbill<br />

Green

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!