memorial for respondent team ago fifth annual foreign ... - FDI Moot

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ARTICLES LIST OF AUTHORITIES Aronson Benjamin M. Aronson, A New Framework for ICSID Annulment Jurisprudence: Rethinking the 'Three Generations', INT’L CONSTITUTIONAL L. J., March 2012. Delaume G. Delaume, Le Centre international pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements (CIRDI), JOURNAL DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL (1982). Tupman M.W. Tupman, Challenge and Disqualification of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration, 38 INT’L & COMP. L. Q. 44 (1989). Scherer Matthias Scherer, ICSID Annulment Proceedings Based on Serious Departure from a Fundamental Rule of Procedure, CZECH (& CENTRAL EUROPEAN) YEARBOOK OF INT’L ARB. (2011). Schreuer (2003) Christoph Schreuer, ICSID Annulment Revisited, 30 LEGAL ISSUES ECON. INTEGRATION 2, 103-122 (2003). BOOKS Broches Aron Broches, “Observations on the Finality of ICSID Awards” in Selected Essays: World Bank, ICSID, and Other Subjects of Public and Private International Law 299 (1995). Dolzer & Schreuer Rudolf Dolzer & Christoph Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (2008). Gaillard Emmanuel Gaillard, “Identify or define? Reflections on the evolution of the concept of investment in ICSID practice,” in International Investment Law for the 21st Century, Oxford University Press (2009). History International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes, History of the ICSID Convention. Documents Concerning the Origin and the Formulation of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, Volume II. McLachlan, Campbell McLachlan QC, Laurence Shore & Matthew Weiniger, iii
Shore & Weiniger Reisman International Investment Arbitration (2007). W. Michael Reisman, Reflections on the Control Mechanism of the ICSID System, in THE REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS, ed. Emmanuel Gaillard, Juris Publishing, Inc. (2010) Schreuer (2001) Christoph Schreuer, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press (2001). Schreuer (2009) Schreuer, Three Generations Sheppard Van Houtte Yannaca-Small MISCELLANEOUS Christoph Schreuer, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, 2d Ed., Cambridge University Press (2009). Christoph Schreuer, Three Generations of ICSID Annulment Proceedings, in ANNULMENT OF ICSID AWARDS, eds. Emmanuel Gaillard and Yas Banifatemi, Juris Publishing, Inc. (2004) Audley Sheppard, Arbitrator Independence in ICSID Arbitration, in INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY, eds. Christina Binder, Ursula Kriebaum, August Reinisch, Stephan Wittich, Oxford University Press (2009). Hans Van Houtte, Article 52 of the Washington Convention – A Brief Introduction, in ANNULMENT OF ICSID AWARDS, eds. Emmanuel Gaillard and Yas Banifatemi, Juris Publishing, Inc. (2004) Katia Yannaca-Small, Annulment of ICSID Awards: Limited Scope But is There Potential ?, in ARBITRATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS: A GUIDE TO THE KEY ISSUES, ed. Katia Yannaca-Small, Oxford University Press (2010) IBA Guidelines International Bar Association Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration (2004). IBA Rules IBA Rules on Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2010). ICSID Background Paper ICSID, Background Paper on Annulment for The Administrative Council of ICSID (2012). ICSID The ICSID Convention, Regulations and Rules. iv
Page 1 and 2: MEMORIAL FOR RESPONDENT TEAM AGO FI
Page 3: A. The tribunal did not manifestly
Page 7 and 8: LIST OF LEGAL SOURCES Abaclat Abacl
Page 9 and 10: Malicorp MCI Millicom Mobil Malicor
Page 11 and 12: Vivendi II Wena v. Argentine Republ
Page 13 and 14: Factual Background STATEMENT OF FAC
Page 15 and 16: 7. Additionally, the Two Members no
Page 17 and 18: contrary, the Tribunal properly adm
Page 19 and 20: evident error of fact in an award i
Page 21 and 22: 26. Since it is apparent that all p
Page 23 and 24: expressly acknowledged that her rol
Page 25 and 26: A. Under ICSID Art. 41(1), the Trib
Page 27 and 28: discretion, reject a decision that
Page 29 and 30: jurisdiction, and then applied the
Page 31 and 32: investment according to Article 25
Page 33 and 34: eached its decision in accordance w
Page 35 and 36: Rather, it is whether the Tribunal
Page 37 and 38: could not “be compared with the c
Page 39 and 40: ather because there was no contribu
Page 41 and 42: 76. In general, a party makes a sub
Page 43 and 44: 81. The Tribunal found that “the
Page 45 and 46: VI. THE TRIBUNAL PROPERLY ADMITTED
Page 47 and 48: [e]ach witness (which term includes
Page 49: REQUEST FOR RELIEF 98. For the afor

memorial for respondent team ago fifth annual foreign ... - FDI Moot

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?