08.03.2013 Views

AUSCHWITZ LIES - Holocaust Handbooks

AUSCHWITZ LIES - Holocaust Handbooks

AUSCHWITZ LIES - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

306 GERMAR RUDOLF, CARLO MATTOGNO · <strong>AUSCHWITZ</strong> <strong>LIES</strong><br />

wire that went up to the ceiling and into the exterior. Inside [98] this part was<br />

a second net with smaller mesh and holes, and in its interior a third [net]<br />

was planted. In this third net a box was moved by means of which, using a<br />

steel wire, the powder – from which the gas had by now evaporated – was<br />

withdrawn.”<br />

Consequently, compared with the testimony of Kula, the testimony of Karl<br />

Schultze is totally insignificant, because – as we have seen above – he only<br />

mentions the holes but not the columns and hence did not see the columns at a<br />

time when they would necessarily have been present, or because he was a<br />

chance witness. Additionally, his testimony was made while he was in Soviet<br />

custody, where his two colleagues died, one of them during the interrogation!<br />

99<br />

In conclusion, if the columns measured 70 cm × 70 cm, the holes in the<br />

ceiling of morgue 1 of crematorium II could not have measured 25 cm × 25<br />

cm.<br />

The second assumption, upon which Provan bases his conclusions, is the<br />

“rule of architecture,” according to which<br />

“when violent stress is put on a concrete structure, cracks show up<br />

passing through holes made previous to the violent force, since the holes<br />

makes the structure weaker in that location.” (p. 26)<br />

Provan has distorted a “rule” mentioned and applied by Germar Rudolf in<br />

his analysis of the openings in question: 100<br />

“An opening pierced through the concrete in the roof of either morgue<br />

1 (‘gas chamber’) in consideration at a later time would inevitably have<br />

had the consequence, when the building was blown up, that the breaks and<br />

fissures caused to the roof by the explosion would have run preferentially<br />

through these holes.<br />

The reason for this is that explosions exert extraordinarily great forces,<br />

and that the formation of cracks is favored by any weakness in the structure,<br />

since the tension peaks attain very high values in the vicinity of acute<br />

angles (notch effect, see Fig. 48). Such holes, in particular, which would<br />

already have damaged the structure of the concrete due to their incorporation<br />

following completion of the structure, represent not only points of likely<br />

fracture, but points of inevitable fracture.”<br />

98 “Za,” literally “behind.”<br />

99 Together with the Topf engineers Kurt Prüfer and Fritz Sander, Schultze had been abducted<br />

by the Soviets and interrogated by the KGB. Sander died already at the beginning of the interrogation<br />

following a heart attack, Prüfer died a few years later following a brain hemorrhage.<br />

The value of confessions gained by the KGB with such interrogation methods is close<br />

to zero. See Jürgen Graf, “Anatomie der sowjetischen Befragung der Topf-Ingenieure,”<br />

Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung, 6(4) (2002), pp. 398-421. Editor’s remark.<br />

100 R. Kammerer, A. Solms (ed.), op. cit. (note 2), pp. 27f.; G. Rudolf, op. cit. (note 71), p. 89<br />

(German), op. cit. (note 2), p. 126f. (Engl.).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!