18.03.2013 Views

11 Years and Counting: Profiles of Men Detained at Guantánamo

11 Years and Counting: Profiles of Men Detained at Guantánamo

11 Years and Counting: Profiles of Men Detained at Guantánamo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“In light <strong>of</strong> the abusive circumstances <strong>of</strong> the detention . . . <strong>and</strong> serious questions about the accuracy <strong>of</strong> their<br />

identific<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> Uthman, the Court finds these st<strong>at</strong>ements to be unreliable <strong>and</strong> will not consider them<br />

in evalu<strong>at</strong>ing whether the detention <strong>of</strong> Uthman is lawful,” Kennedy wrote. Further, under the subheading<br />

“Torture,” Judge Kennedy said the Court could not rely on their st<strong>at</strong>ements “because there is unrebutted<br />

evidence in the record th<strong>at</strong>, <strong>at</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> the interrog<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> which they made the st<strong>at</strong>ements, [Sharqawi]<br />

recently had been tortured.”<br />

Joanne Mariner, the director <strong>of</strong> the counterterrorism program <strong>at</strong> Human Rights W<strong>at</strong>ch, investig<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

Sharqawi’s tre<strong>at</strong>ment while in Jordanian custody.<br />

“I agree with the judge,” she said. “There is no doubt he was very seriously tortured in Jordanian custody<br />

which is why he was sent there. He was just sent there because <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> time, the CIA was still outsourcing<br />

the most brutal methods <strong>of</strong> torture. This was before the CIA had set up its own prison system <strong>and</strong> was still<br />

working out authoriz<strong>at</strong>ion for the use <strong>of</strong> abusive techniques,” Mariner said.<br />

In his habeas case, the Court found th<strong>at</strong> Sharqawi had been tortured. Chief Judge Royce Lamberth found:<br />

“At the outset, the Court finds th<strong>at</strong> respondents-who neither admit nor deny petitioner’s alleg<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

regarding his custody in Jordan <strong>and</strong> Kabul-effectively admit those alleg<strong>at</strong>ions. Accordingly,<br />

the Court accepts petitioner’s alleg<strong>at</strong>ions as true. In Jordan, petitioner experienced p<strong>at</strong>ent<br />

coercion during interrog<strong>at</strong>ions-including intimid<strong>at</strong>ion, regular be<strong>at</strong>ings, <strong>and</strong> thre<strong>at</strong>s <strong>of</strong> electrocution<br />

<strong>and</strong> violence. In Kabul, he was forced to endure complete darkness <strong>and</strong> continuous loud<br />

music. The Court thus finds th<strong>at</strong> petitioner was subject to physical <strong>and</strong> psychological coercion<br />

in Jordan <strong>and</strong> Kabul” Sharqawi abdu ali Al Hajj, Civil Action No 09-745 (RCL), June 8, 20<strong>11</strong>.<br />

As John Ch<strong>and</strong>ler also observed, “After years <strong>of</strong> torture, an FBI clean team came in to start interrog<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

anew in the hope <strong>of</strong> obtaining inform<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> was admissible <strong>and</strong> not the product <strong>of</strong> torture. The Courts,<br />

however, have held th<strong>at</strong> torture after Karachi excludes all his interrog<strong>at</strong>ions. Nearly 10 years l<strong>at</strong>er, Sharqawi<br />

sits in <strong>Guantánamo</strong>. His health is ruined by his tre<strong>at</strong>ment by or on behalf <strong>of</strong> our country. He can e<strong>at</strong> little<br />

but yogurt. He weighs perhaps 120 pounds. The United St<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> America has lost its way.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!