CONECA "ERRORSCOPE" - CSD Internet
CONECA "ERRORSCOPE" - CSD Internet
CONECA "ERRORSCOPE" - CSD Internet
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Pre-Strike Damage<br />
Closely Mimicking an Incomplete Punch<br />
by Mike Damond<br />
Some months back Frank Leone<br />
sent me a 1980 cent with what<br />
he suspected was an incomplete<br />
punch (Fig. 1). An incomplete punch<br />
(incomplete clip) occurs when the<br />
punch (blanking die) fails to completely<br />
penetrate the coin metal strip.<br />
When a second, successful punch<br />
overlaps the initial incomplete<br />
punch, a blank is produced with a<br />
curved groove on both faces. This<br />
groove persists even after the coin is<br />
struck.<br />
At first, the planchet defect on<br />
Frank’s coin does resemble an incomplete<br />
punch. However, further inspection<br />
showed that it was another form<br />
of pre-strike damage that coincidentally<br />
resembled a bona fide incomplete<br />
punch.<br />
Let’s compare Frank’s coin with an<br />
undoubted incomplete punch. This<br />
1996-D quarter shows both an<br />
incomplete punch and a curved clip<br />
(Fig. 2). An incomplete punch should<br />
be present on both faces and the two<br />
Errorscope, November/December 2008 . . . . . . page 30<br />
punch marks should line up perfectly.<br />
One punch mark is from the edge<br />
of the blanking die. The other is from<br />
the hole in the perforated base plate<br />
that the blank is pushed through. The<br />
quarter fits the expectation. However,<br />
the 1980 cent shows a punch mark on<br />
only the reverse face. The obverse<br />
only shows a slight indentation in the<br />
design rim at 3:00.<br />
An incomplete punch should penetrate<br />
the surface, which is indeed<br />
what we see in both the 1996-D quar-<br />
Figure 1a,b. 1980 cent with what looks like an incomplete punch on the reverse face<br />
(but isn’t). Coin courtesy of Frank Leone.<br />
Figure 1c. Close-up of the alleged<br />
punch mark.<br />
Figure 1d. Cent blank placed next to the alleged<br />
punch mark. The radius of curvature of the cent<br />
blank is much greater than that of the faux punch<br />
mark.