23.03.2013 Views

Spring 2007 - Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy

Spring 2007 - Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy

Spring 2007 - Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 3 0 I nterpretation<br />

rule (1.1.1-2; Prince, ch. 9). But if, as Xenophon suggests, human beings resist<br />

being ruled by anyone they perceive trying to rule over them, then one way<br />

for an aspiring ruler to avoid this seemingly inevitable resistance would be to<br />

disguise his true intentions. As the prologue implies and the Cyropaedia as a<br />

whole confirms, one way for a potential ruler to avoid others’ resistance is to<br />

deceive them, which explains why, as this paper endeavors to show, along the<br />

way in his meteoric rise to power Cyrus <strong>of</strong> necessity deceives both friend and<br />

foe alike at every turn.<br />

I. CYRUS’ S D ECEPTION OF C YAXARES<br />

Cyaxares, Cyrus’s uncle on his mother Mandane’s side, who at<br />

the outset <strong>of</strong> the narrative is the heir to the Median throne (1.4.7, 1.5.2; 5.5.8),<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the most prominent and important characters in the Cyropaedia.<br />

According to Walter Miller, the translator <strong>of</strong> the Loeb edition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Cyropaedia, “Cyaxares, the son <strong>of</strong> Astyages, is probably not a historical<br />

personage, but was invented by Xenophon to bring out Cyrus’s perfect<br />

discipline in obedience as well as in ruling” (Miller 1994, 468). While Miller is<br />

right to stress Cyaxares’ general importance, his assessment <strong>of</strong> Cyaxares’<br />

specific role is problematic to the extent that Cyrus does not in fact obey<br />

Cyaxares and, to the contrary, repeatedly and quite deliberately seeks to deceive<br />

him and undermine his authority. In contrast to Miller’s reading, Machiavelli’s<br />

interpretation in the Discourses <strong>of</strong> the role that Cyaxares plays in the<br />

Cyropaedia is far more accurate. On Machiavelli’s reading, Xenophon makes<br />

his Cyrus “deceive Cyaxares…in several modes; without which fraud he shows<br />

that Cyrus could not have attained that greatness he came to” (Discourses,<br />

2.13.1). As Machiavelli recognized, Cyrus’s repeated deception <strong>of</strong> Cyaxares<br />

brings to light as clearly as any passages in the Cyropaedia the lengths to which<br />

Cyrus is willing to go in order to secure power for himself.<br />

The first time Xenophon mentions Cyaxares by name and the<br />

first time he speaks is at 1.4.9, which is to say that Xenophon did not see fit to<br />

give him a proper introduction until slightly past the midpoint <strong>of</strong> Cyrus’s<br />

childhood visit in Media (1.3.1-1.4.28). On the one hand, the fact that<br />

Xenophon does not introduce Cyaxares until approximately halfway through<br />

his account <strong>of</strong> Media is odd, given Cyaxares’ importance as the heir to the<br />

Median throne. On the other hand, by delaying the introduction <strong>of</strong> Cyaxares,<br />

Xenophon reinforces the suggestion he makes in the prologue that what is<br />

most important about the account <strong>of</strong> Media is the education Cyrus received<br />

there (1.1.6). As he does throughout the Cyropaedia, in the account <strong>of</strong> Media<br />

Xenophon keeps the focus almost entirely on Cyrus, such that other characters

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!