UNCLOS and Submarine Cables - Centre for International Law

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Permitting Process Imposes Significant Delays and Costs • Permitting conflicts and uncertainty in waters of disputed Maritime boundary – Cable Ships and Cable Owners are neutral – Repairs are open and transparent – Is there a solution for cable ships and owners to avoid being caught in the middle of competing boundary disputes? – Protocol or understanding that cable repair and survey activities are accepted as done “without prejudice” to any coastal States’ legal claims.
Discussion Points • What are the benefits in allowing repair and maintenance of cables outside territorial seas without permits? • What government agencies are involved in international submarine regulation outside territorial seas? • How can agencies be included in changing laws? • What changes in domestic law are needed to comply with UNCLOS? • What government concerns need to be addressed? 97952
Page 1 and 2: UNCLOS and Submarine Cables China I
Page 3 and 4: Treaties and Agreements • 1884 Su
Page 5 and 6: 1958 Continental Shelf Convention
Page 7 and 8: 1958 High Seas Convention • Conve
Page 9 and 10: High Seas Convention (3) • When l
Page 11 and 12: High Seas Convention (5) • States
Page 13 and 14: 1972 Collision Regulations • Conv
Page 15 and 16: 1982 Law of the Sea Convention •
Page 17 and 18: Land 3 Nautical Miles UNCLOS (3) UN
Page 19 and 20: Archipelagic States • Archipelagi
Page 21 and 22: Article 78. Legal Status of superja
Page 23 and 24: Article 79. Submarine cables and pi
Page 25 and 26: Article 58. Rights and duties of ot
Page 27: Permitting Process Imposes Signific

UNCLOS and Submarine Cables - Centre for International Law

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?