24.03.2013 Views

A Comparison Between The Birkman Method® & MBTI

A Comparison Between The Birkman Method® & MBTI

A Comparison Between The Birkman Method® & MBTI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

their psychological type through the implementation of Jung’s theories. This work<br />

became her mission for the rest of her life. She created the Type Indicators and spent<br />

most of the 50's and 60's validating them, but it wasn't until 1975 that they became an<br />

established tool in occupational psychology.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Birkman</strong> Method<br />

III. <strong>The</strong>oretical Basis & Structure<br />

During his research, <strong>Birkman</strong> found that individual perceptions of others were more<br />

critical to the true measure of personality than any series of self-reported statements<br />

alone. <strong>The</strong> hypothesis implicit in this theoretical position is that a close relationship exists<br />

between individual motives, attitudes and behaviors and how that same individual judges<br />

the motives, attitudes, and behaviors of others.<br />

<strong>Birkman</strong> made two important observations central to his research:<br />

1. Behavior is not determined so much by objective facts as by the particular<br />

meanings the individual attaches to these facts.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> perceptions of some individuals about “most people” and/or “self” may<br />

actually be illusory, irrational, or unreal. Nevertheless, these perceptions are real<br />

and reasonable to individuals, and so, influential on their behaviors.<br />

In order to apply his findings, <strong>Birkman</strong> suggested a new approach to the assessment of<br />

personality and social perceptions. He believed that personality and social perception<br />

differences were likely to emerge more clearly in a questionnaire measuring both<br />

perceptions of self and perceptions of others.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were two reasons for this new approach. First, <strong>Birkman</strong> was interested in<br />

application rather than academic study. While other researchers studied why respondents<br />

behaved the way they did, <strong>Birkman</strong> identified which behaviors resulted from the<br />

respondent’s self and other responses making certain that all the core human dynamics<br />

were included. Second, <strong>Birkman</strong> knew he was working on fundamental human factors<br />

because much of his work was based on that of leading psychologists of his time (e.g.,<br />

Cattell), factor analysis, and current studies relating to clinical conditions (schizophrenia,<br />

bipolar disorder, depression, etc.). Unique to <strong>Birkman</strong> was his self-other perceptual<br />

orientation focused on normal functioning adults. <strong>The</strong> result of <strong>Birkman</strong>'s work evolved<br />

into <strong>The</strong> <strong>Birkman</strong> Method.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Birkman</strong> Method includes a self-report questionnaire eliciting responses about<br />

perception of self, perception of social context, and perception of occupational<br />

opportunities. Scales were developed empirically by comparing self-report item results<br />

with descriptions of likes, dislikes, and behaviors provided by third parties (e.g.,<br />

supervisors, direct reports). Scale development resulted in ten scales describing<br />

occupational preferences (Interests), eleven scales describing more effective behaviors<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!