eSys Technologies Pte Ltd v nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd
eSys Technologies Pte Ltd v nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd
eSys Technologies Pte Ltd v nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>eSys</strong> <strong>Technologies</strong> <strong>Pte</strong> <strong>Ltd</strong> v [2013] SGCA 27<br />
<strong>nTan</strong> <strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Advisory</strong> <strong>Pte</strong> <strong>Ltd</strong><br />
managing director of the company. The Appellant’s commercial relationship<br />
with Seagate Technology (“Seagate”), a US-based multinational company<br />
which designs, manufactures and markets hard drives, was critical to its<br />
business. In particular, the Appellant relied heavily on its distributorship<br />
agreements with Seagate as 40% of its sales comprised Seagate products.<br />
3 On 6 November 2006, Seagate decided to terminate its worldwide<br />
distributorship agreement with the Appellant and filed a public announcement<br />
with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“the SEC<br />
Announcement”) to this effect. The SEC announcement alleged that:<br />
(a) The Appellant had committed material breaches of its<br />
distribution agreements with Seagate;<br />
(b) The Appellant had refused to allow Seagate to perform a<br />
contractual audit of its sales records to confirm the accuracy of<br />
its rebate claims;<br />
(c) The Appellant’s officials had indicated that an audit would<br />
reveal irregularities in the Appellant’s compliance with the<br />
terms of Seagate’s sales incentive programs and other<br />
unspecified irregularities;<br />
(d) Some US$50 million was owed by the Appellant to Seagate;<br />
and<br />
(e) Seagate fully intended to pursue its contractual audit rights and<br />
claims against the Appellant.<br />
4 The SEC announcement not only had a crippling effect on the<br />
Appellant’s bottom-line but also seriously damaged its commercial reputation.<br />
2