40 days towards a more godly nation - Jesus Is Involved In Politics
40 days towards a more godly nation - Jesus Is Involved In Politics
40 days towards a more godly nation - Jesus Is Involved In Politics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
around the country; 42 equality under the law (derived from equal rights) – and<br />
so it goes.<br />
For <strong>more</strong> information on our rights as penned by Jefferson, you may<br />
wish to refer to www.etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff0950.htm<br />
But how do I determine what a right is? Don’t get confused between rights<br />
and goods<br />
Many people confuse “rights” with “goods.” It’s critical to<br />
differentiate the two. Here’s an easy way to look at it 43 : If a ‘right’ depends on<br />
someone else’s service, work, or money, it’s not a right, it’s goods, and it’s<br />
certainly not a God given or Constitutional Right.<br />
FDR for instance, tried to create a second bill of rights. <strong>In</strong> that bill, he<br />
wanted to include things like the right to a good education, the right to<br />
healthcare, the right to your own house, the right to a good paying job, and the<br />
right to adequate food, clothing and recreation. 44<br />
But, if you have your thinking hat on, you’ll immediately realize that<br />
while these are nice things, they all violate the very concept of God given<br />
unalienable rights. Why? Because while you may have the right to not be<br />
prevented from having an education, you don’t have an entitlement to that<br />
education. Why? Because that education will be dependent on someone else<br />
providing the labor to give you that education. Same for the food, someone had<br />
to grow that food. Someone had to harvest it and clean it. As soon as<br />
something is a product of someone else’s work, it becomes a good, not a right.<br />
You always have a God given right to your own goods, but you have no right<br />
to someone else’s goods. That’s called stealing. And if goods are what you are<br />
promising to someone, however noble those goods are (like healthcare or a<br />
home), eventually you’ll have to enslave some men to guarantee those goods to<br />
other men. Our founders were not idiots. They understood quite well, why<br />
rights were not goods and why they could not write a constitution that<br />
guaranteed goods to anyone, unless they were the fruit of your own honest hard<br />
work.<br />
Notice the difference<br />
The right to bear arms is not an entitlement to a free firearm. The right<br />
to free speech is not an entitlement to a free printing press or radio station. The<br />
right to the pursuit of happiness is not the entitlement to or a guarantee of happiness.<br />
And of course the right to own a home is not the entitlement to a free<br />
home. I hope you see the great difference. This is critical, anytime you vote on<br />
something, ask yourself, “<strong>Is</strong> this law acknowledging a true right or is it mandating<br />
goods that are a result of someone else’s hard work?”<br />
Notice too, that the constitutions that have a bill of rights for educa<br />
42 Wait…is this really a right or just a Southwest Airlines commercial? And do you have to wear a<br />
seatbelt when you move around the country?<br />
43 My sincere thanks to Judge Andrew Napolitano of Fox News. I was looking for an easy way to<br />
articulate this when he explained it so well, while hosting the Glenn Beck show. I have elaborated a bit.<br />
Some people use the concept of negative rights and positive rights, but I got confused by that. This is<br />
much simpler to understand it seems.<br />
44 www.worldpolicy.org/projects/globalrights/econrights/fdr-econbill.html<br />
<strong>40</strong> Days Towards a More Godly Nation Page | 21