02.04.2013 Views

The Tai Ahom National Council Memo Scheduling

The Tai Ahom National Council Memo Scheduling

The Tai Ahom National Council Memo Scheduling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong>re thus grew up <strong>Ahom</strong> ethnic settlements (ban) centering rive-field (na) or pathar.<br />

Pathar or paddy fields concept is thus particularly based on the <strong>Ahom</strong> na (field) system. Even<br />

today many <strong>Ahom</strong> villages surrounding field (pathar) may be found Being situated in low-lying<br />

areas, the <strong>Ahom</strong> villages lay in the interior where communication was possible either by the<br />

country boat during the rainy season or on foot during the dry months. This character of the<br />

<strong>Ahom</strong> villages remained unchanged till the end of the <strong>Ahom</strong> rule, and even today the <strong>Ahom</strong><br />

villages in the erstwhile Sibsagar and Lakhimpur are located in outlying or remote areas Hence<br />

these are isolated or partially isolated areas without having communication network. During the<br />

rainy season, such villages remain cut off for several months. Even at the present time due to<br />

constant flood many <strong>Ahom</strong> villages remain isolated during the rainy season.<br />

<strong>Ahom</strong> Paik System & Communal Land-Holding:<br />

Like all tribal societies, the <strong>Ahom</strong> did not possess land individually. During the <strong>Ahom</strong><br />

rule, all land belonged to the community, and in this case it belonged to the state. Hence, the<br />

<strong>Ahom</strong>s were not a landholding class like those in other parts of India at any time in history. ((S.<br />

K. Goswami, A History of Revenue Administration in Assam 128-1826, 1986, pp.31-32; B.B.<br />

Hazarika, Political Life in Assam during the 19 th Century, 1987, p. 170). E. A. Gait says, “<strong>The</strong><br />

rice lands were redistributed from time to time, but homesteads descended from father to son.”<br />

(A History of Assam, 1926, p. 240).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was no purely private land holding in the <strong>Ahom</strong> state proper. <strong>The</strong>re was no<br />

payment of money for rendering services to the state in various capacities. Everyone was paid a<br />

certain quantity of land and also certain number of paik (persons rendering physical services to<br />

the state) all according to rank and status. <strong>The</strong>se they held so long as they were in office, but on<br />

removal or death of the holder, all material benefits reverted to the state possession. This system<br />

peculiarly of <strong>Tai</strong> origin introduced by the <strong>Ahom</strong> in Upper Assam districts continued<br />

uninterrupted till the end of the <strong>Ahom</strong> rule. It is this system that the British found in 1826. Such<br />

a system did not allow any land-owning class to grow, and in fact there was no land-owning<br />

zemindsar as existed in the neighbouring Mughal Bengal and Bihar of that time. It also obviated<br />

the need for metallic currency circulation.<br />

Trade was done by barter; it was the universal system in the <strong>Ahom</strong> kingdom. Land revenue did<br />

not exist in the proper <strong>Ahom</strong> kingdom, and unemployment was unknown. During 1662-63<br />

Shihab-ud-din Talsh noted, “<strong>The</strong> bazar road is narrow, and is only occupied by pan-sellers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!