02.04.2013 Views

Dreamers of the Dark: - Research Commons - The University of ...

Dreamers of the Dark: - Research Commons - The University of ...

Dreamers of the Dark: - Research Commons - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

once sacrificed a toad to Satan, and called for <strong>the</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> Christianity,<br />

Crowley did not consider himself a Satanist in any real sense except as a public<br />

persona. Crowley, through his infamy and along with some very real<br />

accomplishments (such as mountaineering in Tibet and trekking through Burma<br />

and China during <strong>the</strong> 1910s), as well as an impeccable occult pedigree, provided a<br />

role model for generations <strong>of</strong> occultists who embraced, or certainly did not shy<br />

away from, activities which have been traditionally associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

blasphemous inversions <strong>of</strong> religion. <strong>The</strong> great gift <strong>of</strong> Crowley was, however,<br />

using blasphemy as a path <strong>of</strong> transcendence or liberation away from constraining,<br />

constricting and unthinking societally enforced habit patterns. This ethos <strong>of</strong><br />

challenge and <strong>the</strong> seeking <strong>of</strong> intellectual and spiritual emancipation became <strong>the</strong><br />

fundamental idea which inspired a new generation <strong>of</strong> Satanists. To such eyes,<br />

society forced on individuals behavioural patterns that were essentially<br />

conditioned, unnatural and unthinking, which stultified <strong>the</strong>ir reasoning and<br />

repressed <strong>the</strong>ir True Self. By challenging such culturally defined patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

behaviour (especially <strong>the</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> religious orthodoxy), one can free<br />

oneself from its ‘negative’ hold and become liberated into a whole new<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human condition. Satanism had become <strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />

In 1964, Anton Szandor LaVey became <strong>the</strong> next great influential figure in<br />

Satanism, effectively becoming <strong>the</strong> ‘founder’ <strong>of</strong> modern Satanism and responsible<br />

for its development as a sophisticated and comparatively public religiophilosophic<br />

system. LaVey founded <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> Satan (CoS) in San Francisco<br />

on April 30, Walpurgisnacht, 1966 and through <strong>the</strong> church articulated his<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> what it means to be Satanic 24 . One distinctive and influential<br />

feature <strong>of</strong> LaVey’s Satanism was <strong>the</strong> premise that <strong>the</strong> secular-scientific worldview<br />

was essentially <strong>the</strong> correct one and that religious world-views are<br />

fundamentally wrong and to be rejected 25 . As such ‘Satan’, as a real<br />

individualized spiritual figure, does not exist and supernatural powers are simply<br />

24 LaVey famously said in <strong>the</strong> introduction to his Satanic Bible (New York: Avon, 1969) that<br />

founding <strong>the</strong> church enabled him to “follow <strong>the</strong> magical formula <strong>of</strong> one part outrage to nine parts<br />

social respectability that is needed for success”<br />

25 Ibid. p.49<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!