03.04.2013 Views

Shepherd's Rod / Davidian History - Temcat's House

Shepherd's Rod / Davidian History - Temcat's House

Shepherd's Rod / Davidian History - Temcat's House

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Shepherd’s <strong>Rod</strong> and the <strong>Davidian</strong>s<br />

setting aside their former name, "The <strong>Shepherd's</strong> <strong>Rod</strong>, " and now calling themselves "The <strong>Davidian</strong><br />

Seventh-day Adventist Church." At last, they were publicly an offshoot, something that Houteff had not<br />

previously wanted to admit.<br />

In spite of the name change, throughout the 1940s and 1950s, members of the group continued to refer<br />

to themselves as members of "the <strong>Rod</strong>." It would not be until the multiple splinterings that occurred<br />

between 1955 and 1962 that the various segments fully switched over to variations of the term<br />

"<strong>Davidian</strong>s."<br />

In 1950, Houteff referred to the fact that the <strong>Rod</strong> was but an offshoot. He spoke of "an ever-increasing<br />

family of offshoots, the most prominent of them and most tormenting of which is the <strong>Shepherd's</strong> <strong>Rod</strong>."<br />

(V.T. Houteff, in his "1950 General Conference Special, " p. 3.) And, from the very beginning, this<br />

offshoot began offshooting on its own. The following statement was made as early as 1934:<br />

"The disintegrating and dividing effect of erroneous teachings has already appeared in the ranks of the<br />

<strong>Shepherd's</strong> <strong>Rod</strong>. A substantial number of them, some of them former leaders, have because of errors<br />

they found in 'The <strong>Shepherd's</strong> <strong>Rod</strong>' [publication], left the former leadership of V.T. Houteff and are<br />

meeting by themselves as a separate company. This runs true to form, and is in line with the history of<br />

preceding offshoots who have left us."-Pacific Union Conference statement, 1934.<br />

Throughout its entire history, Houteff was his organization's biggest weakness. The doctrinal views that<br />

he invented at its inception contained the seeds of its later destruction. The concepts he later built on<br />

those original conjectures only added to the confusion. The underlying problem was that the poor man<br />

was obsessed with the idea that he was infallible in thought and word. His imaginings about Scripture<br />

were thought by him as the mind of God. His followers shared this delusion, thinking that he had the gift<br />

of prophecy.<br />

As Houteff himself said:<br />

"We must conclude that the '<strong>Rod</strong>' contains all truth, or there is no truth in it save the quotations of<br />

truth. Therefore, if we admit one truth revealed by the '<strong>Rod</strong>,' then we must accept it all as truth . .<br />

Therefore we take the position that the message in the '<strong>Rod</strong>' is free from error in so far as the idea put<br />

forth is concerned."-V. T. Houteff, circular letter dated August 31, 1931 [Italics his].<br />

Here was a man who claimed infallibility without limit! He asserted that, if even one of his ideas was<br />

correct, they all had to be correct! Four years later he repeated this astounding claim (in The Symbolic<br />

code, vol. 1, no. 8, August 15, 1935), and again in the late 1940s (Timely Greetings, vol. 1, no. 18, p. 10,<br />

quoting an address of his given on December 7, 1947).<br />

That one statement, alone, by Victor Houteff-repeated in print at least three times-should have been<br />

enough to warn any seeker after truth from following such an eccentric individual. Only God and His<br />

Inspired Scriptures are safe. The words of no one else can be as reliable.<br />

- CHAPTER THREE -<br />

THE FLORENCE HOUTEFF YEARS<br />

THE ROD IN WACO, TEXAS 1955 - 1962<br />

Among other concepts, Victor Houteff taught that he would not die, but would lead his people to old<br />

Jerusalem and thence to the heavenly Canaan. Thus it came as quite a shock to his followers when, on<br />

February 5, 1955, he passed to his rest at the age of 69. "It just could not be; it just could not be: Houteff<br />

is dead and Jesus hasn't come back yet" they thought, and yet it had happened: Houteff was dead.<br />

www.remnant-prophecy.com ~ www.temcat.com 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!