03.04.2013 Views

The Pharisees and the Sadducees: Rethinking Their Respective ...

The Pharisees and the Sadducees: Rethinking Their Respective ...

The Pharisees and the Sadducees: Rethinking Their Respective ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9251 PHARISEES AND SADDUCEES 929<br />

lematic. One scholar has identified three weaknesses of <strong>the</strong><br />

Rabbinic literature:<br />

First, <strong>the</strong> Rabbis regarded <strong>the</strong>mselves as <strong>the</strong> spiritual heirs of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Pharisees</strong>. Hence, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sadducees</strong> were <strong>the</strong> opponents.<br />

Second, as a result of censorship of Jewish texts by Christians<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Middle Ages, <strong>the</strong> word seduqi ("Sadducean") was often<br />

introduced into <strong>the</strong> text of <strong>the</strong> Mishnah <strong>and</strong> Talmud to re-<br />

place words for "Christians" or "heretics." <strong>The</strong>refore, many of<br />

<strong>the</strong> alleged references to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sadducees</strong> in Rabbinic texts have<br />

no bearing on <strong>the</strong>m. Third, <strong>the</strong> earliest strata of talmudic<br />

literature are . . . far removed from <strong>the</strong> early years of <strong>the</strong> . . .<br />

period <strong>and</strong> can at best be considered reliable for <strong>the</strong> last years<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Second Temple period."<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, scholars have begun to analyze <strong>the</strong> Rabbinic<br />

literature in light of <strong>the</strong>se problems <strong>and</strong> have made great<br />

strides in distinguishing between <strong>the</strong> historically accurate por-<br />

tions of <strong>the</strong> literature <strong>and</strong> those portions which may not be as<br />

reliable.21<br />

By recognizing <strong>the</strong> shortcomings of <strong>the</strong> sources which dis-<br />

cuss first century Jewish sects, scholars are reconstructing a<br />

more accurate picture of <strong>the</strong> groups. This comment now pres-<br />

ents a brief overview of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sadducees</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pharisees</strong> before<br />

attempting to reevaluate <strong>the</strong> traditional notions about <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

respective legal views.<br />

B. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Sadducees</strong><br />

Because <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sadducees</strong> left no literary remains, establish-<br />

ing <strong>the</strong>ir beginnings has proven difficult.22 While it is now<br />

generally acceptedZ3 that <strong>the</strong> title "Sadducee" (Hebrew<br />

Zedukim) is derived from <strong>the</strong> name Zadok-<strong>the</strong> high priest in<br />

20. Schiffman, supra note 15, at 7 (footnote omitted).<br />

21. See, e.g., NEUSNER, RABBINIC TRAD~IONS, supm note 3; NEUSNER, INTER-<br />

PRETATION OF THE MISHNAH, supm note 3.<br />

22. Roger T. Beckwith, <strong>The</strong> Pre-History an& Relationships of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pharisees</strong>,<br />

<strong>Sadducees</strong> <strong>and</strong> Essenes: A Tentative Reconstruction, 11 REWE DE QUMRAN 3 (1982),<br />

reprinted in 2:l ORIGINS OF JUDAISM, supra note 1, at 57, 89-90.<br />

Because of <strong>the</strong> dearth <strong>and</strong> ambiguity of source material, a multitude of views<br />

has developed on how <strong>and</strong> when <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sadducees</strong> originated. Compare Lauterbach,<br />

<strong>Pharisees</strong>, supm note 2, at 95 (<strong>Sadducees</strong> are <strong>the</strong> older movement) with Beckwith,<br />

supm at 63-64, 91 (<strong>Sadducees</strong> are a reform movement growing out of <strong>the</strong> inchoate<br />

Pharisaic movement).<br />

23. Beckwith, supra note 22, at 64.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!