Electrocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Using ... - David Boston
Electrocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Using ... - David Boston
Electrocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Using ... - David Boston
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
B8 Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 15 (1) B5-B8 (2012)<br />
Figure 5. GC analyses as a function <strong>of</strong> time for constant-current electrolysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> CO2-saturated solutions using: (a) Pt/C-TiO2 and (b) Pt foil cathodes.<br />
Electrolysis conditions specified in the text.<br />
Only methanol was seen as the CO2 electroreduction product in<br />
the Pt foil case (Fig. 5b). Importantly, no CO was seen in the final<br />
reduction products in either case in Figs. 5a and 5b. This is especially<br />
significant in that metals such as Pt or Pd are known to selectively<br />
produce CO on electroreduction <strong>of</strong> CO2; 4 clearly, the nanocomposite<br />
matrix facilitates deeper reduction (to alcohols) beyond the 2e − CO<br />
stage. The mechanistic factors underlying this trend will be further<br />
probed in follow-on work that is planned.<br />
Finally, we note that the production <strong>of</strong> alcohol per unit mass <strong>of</strong> Pt<br />
for the nanocomposite matrix case (Fig. 5a)isthree orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude<br />
larger than the Pt foil case (Fig. 5b). This represents substantial<br />
reduction in Pt and is an important practical advance toward improving<br />
the economics <strong>of</strong> electrochemical reduction <strong>of</strong> CO2 to liquid fuels.<br />
Conclusions<br />
This study has shown for the first time that nanocomposite cathode<br />
matrices derived from either Pt/C-TiO2 or Pt-Pd/C-TiO2 are<br />
effective electrocatalysts for aqueous CO2 reduction in the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> a solution co-catalyst such as the pyrdinium cation. In a<br />
broader paradigm sense, the present findings (along with Ref. 7) also<br />
serve to demonstrate that fuel cell cathode matrices may be good<br />
candidates to drive multi-electron, multi-proton reduction reactions<br />
such as CO2 reduction. It is worth noting in this regard that matrices<br />
such as carbon black have good adsorption affinity for CO2 13<br />
pointing to synergistic factors such as the site-proximity effect14 being<br />
operative for nanocomposite matrices such as the ones developed<br />
in this study. It is also recalled that Pt/C-TiO2 nanocomposite<br />
cathodes have been previously deployed for oxygen reduction in a<br />
1, 2, 15<br />
proton electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEM FC) environment.<br />
Their application here, under nominally less corrosive conditions<br />
(no reactive oxygen species), may <strong>of</strong>fer a nanocomposite cathode<br />
material <strong>of</strong> enhanced stability toward carbon corrosion and Pt<br />
agglomeration.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The authors thank Drs. Wesley Wampler and Wen-Yuan Lin (Sid<br />
Richardson <strong>Carbon</strong> & Energy Co) for donation <strong>of</strong> the carbon black<br />
samples used in this study. This study was funded in part by a grant<br />
from the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy. Finally, we thank an anonymous<br />
reviewer for constructive comments on an initial manuscript version.<br />
References<br />
1. N. R. de Tacconi, C. R. Chenthamarakshan, K. Rajeshwar, W.-Y. Lin, T. F. Carlson,<br />
L. Nikiel, W. A. Wamper, S. Sambandam, and V. Ramani, J. Electrochem. Soc., 155,<br />
B1102 (2008).<br />
2. N. R. de Tacconi, K. Rajeshwar, W. Chanmanee, V. Valluri, W. A. Wampler, W.-Y.<br />
Lin, and L. Nikiel, J. Electrochem. Soc,. 157, B147 (2010).<br />
3. E. Barton-Cole, P. S. Lakkaraju, D. M. Rampulla, A. J. Morris, E. Abelev, and A. B.<br />
Bocarsly, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 11539 (2010).<br />
4. Y. Hori, H. Wakebe, T. Tsukamoto, and O. Koga, Electrochim. Acta, 39, 1833<br />
(1994).<br />
5. M. Jitaru, D. A. Lowy, M. Toma, B. C. Toma, and L. Oniciu, J. Appl. Electrochem.,<br />
27, 875 (1997).<br />
6. C. M. Sanchez-Sanchez, V. Montiel, D. A. Tryk, A. Aldaz, and A. Fujishima, Pure<br />
Appl. Chem., 73, 1917 (2001).<br />
7. S. R. Narayanan, B. Haines, J. Soler, and T. I. Valdez, J. Electrochem. Soc., 158,<br />
A167 (2011).<br />
8. W. Y. Lin, C. Wei, and K. Rajeshwar, J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, 2477 (1993).<br />
9. G. Sesadri, C. Lin, and A. B. Bocarsly, J. Electroanal. Chem., 372, 145 (1994).<br />
10. A. J. Bard and L. R. Falkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications,<br />
Second Edition, Wiley, New York, 2001, Chapter 9.<br />
11. GSI Chemical Data Base, http://www.gsi-net.com/en/publications/gsi-chemical-data<br />
base/single/474.html.<br />
12. T. Ikeda, P. Denisevich, K. Willman, and R. W. Murray, J. Am. Chem. Soc,. 104, 2683<br />
(1982).<br />
13. V. Yu. Gavrilov and R. S. Zakharov, Kinetics and Catalysis, 51, 609 (2010).<br />
14. N. R. de Tacconi, H. Wenren, D. McChesney, and K. Rajeshwar, Langmuir, 14, 2933<br />
(1998).<br />
15. S. Sambandam, V. Valluri, W. Chanmanee, N. R. de Tacconi, W. A. Wampler,<br />
W.-Y. Lin, T. F. Carlson, V. Ramani, and K. Rajeshwar, J. Chem. Soc., 121, 655<br />
(2009).<br />
Downloaded 29 Nov 2011 to 129.107.54.102. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp