Perkin Warbeck (NZ version) - Richard III Society - New Zealand ...
Perkin Warbeck (NZ version) - Richard III Society - New Zealand ...
Perkin Warbeck (NZ version) - Richard III Society - New Zealand ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
events in their lives allegedly to proof that he really is her son. However, all this<br />
shows is that he seems to know about them, as a foster child would as well. And<br />
the events do not add up either. He refers to the death of his sister Jehanne<br />
from the plague in 1487, while according to the archives she was still alive and<br />
married in 1517. Nor was there any plague in Tournai in 1487 or about that time.<br />
The letter also mentions the death of the father in 1497, when the archives<br />
indicate that he only died in 1498 49 .<br />
All this shows that some serious doubts regarding the truthfulness of the<br />
confession are justified.<br />
3. Behaviour of European Rulers<br />
Another reason for his being an impostor is often seen in the support he received<br />
from other European rulers. The theory goes that they needed someone for their<br />
own ends to play the prince and that they dropped him as soon as he had<br />
reached his use-by-date 50 . This logic seems somewhat flawed: a real prince<br />
would have served the same purpose as an impostor. Nor can it be maintained<br />
that they all got something out of it, nor did all drop him. Lets look at the actions<br />
of these rulers more closely:<br />
3.1 Charles V<strong>III</strong> of France: He certainly used him for his own ends. However,<br />
while <strong>Richard</strong> was at his court, Charles wrote to James IV of Scotland that this<br />
was indeed <strong>Richard</strong> of York. In the treaty Henry had demanded that he should<br />
hand <strong>Richard</strong> over to Henry, but Charles facilitated his escape instead 51 . Nothing<br />
there to show that he thought him an impostor!<br />
3.2 Margaret of Burgundy: If we accept that the two boys were smuggled out<br />
of England and she was responsible for hiding them, she would have known who<br />
this young man was. Since 1488 she was in regular contact with James IV of<br />
Scotland about her nephew. From 1490 onwards, when he was still in Portugal,<br />
she actively spread rumours that <strong>Richard</strong> was alive 52 . She tirelessly worked<br />
towards the restoration of the House of York, which brought her a bad press from<br />
Tudor historians. They say that she taught the young man all the details he knew<br />
about the court of Edward IV. However, she had left England before <strong>Richard</strong><br />
was born and only returned for a short visit in 1480 and would not have known<br />
much herself 53 .<br />
I doubt, whether someone with such a strong sense of family, as she by all<br />
49 Kleyn, pp. 197-198<br />
50 An example is Macdougall, p. 23. Macdougall, Norman, “The Debate: Who was <strong>Perkin</strong> <strong>Warbeck</strong>?”<br />
Ricardian Bulletin, Summer 2005, pp. 22 - 24<br />
51 Wroe, Perfect Prince, pp. 115-120<br />
52 Wroe, Perfect Prince, p. 91<br />
53 Kleyn, pp. 96-97