09.04.2013 Views

Plant taxonomic expertise - SABONET

Plant taxonomic expertise - SABONET

Plant taxonomic expertise - SABONET

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Overview<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> <strong>taxonomic</strong> <strong>expertise</strong> is an inventory of local<br />

and overseas taxonomists and other plant<br />

diversity experts with knowledge of southern<br />

African plants. The book contains the<br />

biographical, contact, <strong>expertise</strong> and interest<br />

information of more than 200 plant <strong>taxonomic</strong><br />

experts, as well as a selected bibliography of<br />

publications.<br />

This inventory supports the recommendations of<br />

the DIVERSITAS/Systematics Agenda 2000<br />

International Workshop, held at the American<br />

Museum of Natural History, New York, in<br />

September 1998, which recommends that<br />

“national action plans should include the<br />

development of a database of <strong>taxonomic</strong><br />

<strong>expertise</strong> for all relevant taxa.” (American<br />

Museum of Natural History 1999).<br />

We started the project in November 1997 by<br />

sending a detailed questionnaire to<br />

approximately 100 plant experts. Since then,<br />

most of these questionnaires have been<br />

returned; we have also handed out additional<br />

questionnaires to people not reached by the<br />

initial mailing. We started computerising the<br />

information in November 1998, transferring the<br />

information supplied by respondents to a<br />

Microsoft® Access database. The database<br />

contains detailed information for 202 experts and<br />

covers 225 plant families and 1 300 genera.<br />

Originally, the inventory targeted only plant<br />

experts resident in southern Africa. Later,<br />

however, we decided to extend the inventory to<br />

include all taxonomists and other plant diversity<br />

experts who have published work on southern<br />

African plants. To make the inventory more<br />

inclusive, we added the names and specialities of<br />

the authors listed in List of <strong>taxonomic</strong> literature<br />

of southern African plants (Meyer, Mössmer &<br />

Smith 1997) to the database. To gather more<br />

comprehensive information for these entries,<br />

personalised questionnaires were sent out to the<br />

individuals concerned. The details of persons<br />

who responded to the questionnaire were<br />

updated in the database. The book contains only<br />

the details of those individuals who responded to<br />

our questionnaires; the database, however,<br />

contains the names of an additional 246 people<br />

that we were unable to contact (see Appendix).<br />

Publications lists submitted by the respondents<br />

were entered in a ProCite database, which was<br />

used to generate two bibliographies—listed by<br />

author and listed by taxon name.<br />

Sections<br />

The main directory of experts, combined with<br />

several detailed indices, makes it easy to find<br />

information from a number of different starting<br />

points. For example, you can look up the details<br />

of a specific person in the alphabetical main<br />

directory. Or, you can find out the names of<br />

everybody interested in a specific plant genus or<br />

plant family. You can also find information by<br />

research interest, such as “Ethnobotany”, or<br />

Introduction<br />

Introduction<br />

Introduction<br />

2<br />

6%<br />

26%<br />

Age distribution<br />

29%<br />

24%<br />

10%<br />

20-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90<br />

Figure 1. The age distribution of the respondents.<br />

Most respondents are in the 41–50 year<br />

age group. Very few respondents were from the<br />

20–30 year age group. This could indicate that<br />

these botanists did not consider themselves<br />

“experts” yet. There were no respondents from<br />

the 71–80 year age group. n = 197.<br />

Amateur<br />

Certificate<br />

Diploma<br />

Bachelor's Degree<br />

Honours Degree<br />

Masters Degree<br />

Doctorate<br />

2.5%<br />

0.5%<br />

2%<br />

5%<br />

Qualifications<br />

10%<br />

27%<br />

0%<br />

5%<br />

53%<br />

Figure 2. Highest qualifications obtained by the<br />

respondents. The analysis indicates that the<br />

respondents are highly qualified: 94% have a<br />

university degree. Over half the respondents<br />

have a doctorate or equivalent degree. n = 198.<br />

University of Pretoria<br />

University of Cape Town<br />

University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg<br />

University of the Witwatersrand<br />

University of Stellenbosch<br />

University of Reading<br />

Universidade de Lisboa<br />

Rand Afrikaans University<br />

University of Zimbabwe<br />

University of the Orange Free State<br />

Major universities<br />

Rhodes University<br />

8<br />

6<br />

6<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4<br />

11<br />

14<br />

21<br />

Number of qualifications<br />

Figure 3. The eleven universities from which<br />

most respondents received their highest<br />

qualifications. Most of these universities (64%)<br />

are in South Africa, with the exception of the<br />

universities of Zimbabwe, Reading, and Lisbon.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!