10.04.2013 Views

45930 Divine Call CTCR final - The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

45930 Divine Call CTCR final - The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

45930 Divine Call CTCR final - The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

visiting the sick and may snap at people when they come<br />

to see him; and he may fall into many of the other sins that<br />

appear in the lives of pastors. 54<br />

He does not expressly state, however, that a pastor who is guilty of any of<br />

the offenses listed here ought as a result to be deposed. He does point out<br />

that “a congregation has the right to admonish such a pastor, and to remind<br />

him of his duty....”(emphasis added). 55 Such admonition, however, may be<br />

to no avail without the backing of an evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> synod. Two<br />

paragraphs later Walther contends,<br />

You see, a synod will always support the congregation if it<br />

can prove that its pastor is unfaithful to his office, lazy,<br />

indifferent, immoral, power-hungry, stubborn, or is living<br />

in manifest sins. Through the District President the <strong>Synod</strong><br />

will visit the congregation and will support those who are<br />

right. He may know best how to disarm those who support<br />

the unfaithful, wicked pastor (emphasis added). 56<br />

<strong>The</strong> question may be asked, does Walther’s reference here to “disarming”<br />

those who support an “unfaithful, wicked pastor” imply that a congregation<br />

has the right to remove a pastor who is guilty of any of those listed<br />

behaviors and attitudes?<br />

In his essay to the Iowa District convention Walther seems to offer yet<br />

another reason for the removal of a pastor, namely, a domineering spirit. In<br />

<strong>The</strong>sis II he submits that an evangelical <strong>Lutheran</strong> synod should “protect<br />

them [congregations] against pastors who err in doctrine, follow an offensive<br />

life-style, and are domineering in their office.” 57 As if to emphasize the<br />

point, Walther opens his discussion of this part of <strong>The</strong>sis II by noting that<br />

his hearers should not think “that the congregation cannot depose anyone<br />

because of godless living and that it cannot get rid of one who oversteps his<br />

authority and proves to be domineering.…” (emphasis added). 58 Walther proceeds<br />

to discuss the matter on the basis of 3 John 9-10. In this passage John<br />

mentions Diotrephes, who is a bishop or pastor who wants to be “Number<br />

One” (philoprōteuōn). Diotrephes<br />

loved power and honor, was a proud and arrogant bishop.<br />

He wouldn’t even listen to the apostle John. He would<br />

say, “What do I care about him?” <strong>The</strong>n John adds, “<strong>The</strong>re-<br />

54<br />

Walther, Essays, 2:36.<br />

55<br />

Ibid.<br />

56<br />

Walther, Essays, 2:37.<br />

57<br />

Walther, Essays, 2:25, 35.<br />

58<br />

Walther, Essays, 2:35.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!