Acceptance – Never Ever. - Traditional Zoroastrianism: Tenets of the ...
Acceptance – Never Ever. - Traditional Zoroastrianism: Tenets of the ...
Acceptance – Never Ever. - Traditional Zoroastrianism: Tenets of the ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A "marriage", <strong>the</strong>refore, for a Mazdayasni Zoroastrian, is only that which is contracted with<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r Mazdayasni Zoroastrian. A Parsee Zoroastrian, <strong>the</strong>refore, simply cannot marry a non-<br />
Zoroastrian and <strong>the</strong> so-called civil marriages or unions <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrians with non-Zoroastrians under<br />
any secular law, are merely contracts, and are contrary to <strong>the</strong> canon law <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zoroastrian<br />
Religion. Such mixed marriages are regarded as sinful because <strong>the</strong> law <strong>of</strong> "Asha" is flouted and<br />
<strong>the</strong> spiritual salvation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> souls <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties to such marriage and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> souls <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
progeny <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> is deterred.<br />
There is still ano<strong>the</strong>r question to be considered. What about <strong>the</strong> progenies <strong>of</strong> a Zoroastrian<br />
male, who has merely signed on <strong>the</strong> dotted line to yoke himself with a non-Zoroastrian female and<br />
<strong>the</strong>n live as "husband" and "wife"? The answer to that is vividly given in <strong>the</strong> Vendidad. In Chapter<br />
(fargard) 18, paragraphs 62 and 63, it has been emphatically stated that such a relationship<br />
tantamounts to sinful adultery! A Mazdayasni Zoroastrian, <strong>the</strong>refore, ceases to be a Zoroastrian,<br />
after "marriage" with an alien. A Zoroastrian "marrying" an alien spurns <strong>the</strong> command <strong>of</strong> his<br />
Religion regarding marriage and he or she cannot practise <strong>the</strong> Zoroastrian Religion <strong>the</strong>reafter.<br />
Thus, it is very important that as far as <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> marriage is concerned, <strong>the</strong> Zoroastrian<br />
Religion does not distinguish between a man and a woman. They both flout <strong>the</strong> Divine Law and<br />
Order (Law <strong>of</strong> Asha) and are unfit in Nature to practise <strong>the</strong> tenets and doctrines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zoroastrian<br />
Religion, if <strong>the</strong>y marry non-Zoroastrians.<br />
It, <strong>the</strong>refore, automatically follows from this, that <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> such an illegal and<br />
invalid union between a Zoroastrian and a non-Zoroastrian is not a born Mazdayasni, whose<br />
Navjote can be performed to make it a Mazdayasni Zarthoshti !<br />
The ancient Iranian Zoroastrians were very very particular and careful about preserving and<br />
protecting <strong>the</strong> purity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir genes and <strong>the</strong>ir lineage - a subject which requires some detailed<br />
treatment in <strong>the</strong> next chapter.<br />
But before we conclude this chapter, a word about what our Pazend Prayer, Patet Pashemani<br />
has to say about <strong>the</strong> sins committed by a Zoroastrian entering into wedlock with a non-Zoroastrian.<br />
One is <strong>the</strong> sin <strong>of</strong> Gunah-e-Ravani and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r is <strong>the</strong> sin <strong>of</strong> Doodey Vahaan-vasovasni. The former<br />
is a "sin relating to <strong>the</strong> soul", <strong>of</strong> contracting inter-religious "marriage", as <strong>the</strong> progress <strong>of</strong> such a soul<br />
is deterred by such "marriage". The latter is a sin relating to <strong>the</strong> ancestral family <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> person<br />
contracting such a "marriage", as <strong>the</strong> lineage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> person going for such a union is snapped !<br />
23