- Page 1: BLENDED LEARNING A Wise Giver’s G
- Page 5: Copyright © 2013, The Philanthropy
- Page 8 and 9: 5. Barriers to the Growth of Blende
- Page 10 and 11: The key is to demand adaptive, rigo
- Page 12 and 13: How New Technology and Savvy Philan
- Page 14 and 15: innovative schools and other organi
- Page 16 and 17: This definition is loose enough to
- Page 18 and 19: • Online + Enrichment: Students a
- Page 20 and 21: A careful mix of digital and human
- Page 22 and 23: the text book, paragraph by paragra
- Page 24 and 25: There’s plenty of evidence that m
- Page 26 and 27: standards. A number of cities—suc
- Page 28 and 29: per-pupil allocations. Charter scho
- Page 30 and 31: What Can Blended-learning Advocates
- Page 32 and 33: Slow Uptake of Technology in Both H
- Page 34 and 35: easier to enforce. Teachers, princi
- Page 36 and 37: In addition to its operative contri
- Page 38 and 39: get immediate data on how students
- Page 40 and 41: First Lady of Digital Education No
- Page 42 and 43: Nonetheless, Danner is optimistic a
- Page 44 and 45: Changing an Obsolete System Like Gi
- Page 46 and 47: math, flunked math. Everything they
- Page 48 and 49: Sal Khan and Serendipitous Philanth
- Page 50 and 51: didn’t understand, or not get slo
- Page 52 and 53:
Students work primarily on their co
- Page 54 and 55:
how the school could achieve such r
- Page 56 and 57:
etention from year one to year two,
- Page 58 and 59:
their blended-learning program thou
- Page 60 and 61:
maintains a presence in social medi
- Page 62 and 63:
an existing bureaucracy is hard. Ex
- Page 64 and 65:
The Potential of Blended Learning M
- Page 66 and 67:
Tom Vander Ark, author of Getting S
- Page 68 and 69:
ut they aren’t at present. “We
- Page 70 and 71:
Wendy who intelligently exploited t
- Page 72 and 73:
of it. They don’t know how to toi
- Page 74 and 75:
A teacher could stay up 24 hours a
- Page 76 and 77:
On the first day of a pilot blended
- Page 78 and 79:
It is true that, over time, widespr
- Page 80 and 81:
Digital learning doesn’t eliminat
- Page 82 and 83:
Can Blended Learning Rescue Catholi
- Page 84 and 85:
was quite an undertaking. Not only
- Page 86 and 87:
of extra free hours to have fun in
- Page 88 and 89:
Barriers to the Growth of Blended L
- Page 90 and 91:
cent proficient or advanced. It als
- Page 92 and 93:
A final bit of good news is that bl
- Page 94 and 95:
Many of blended learning’s first
- Page 96 and 97:
moved the student to mastery, wheth
- Page 98 and 99:
Merit Badges How do the Boy Scouts
- Page 100 and 101:
How Innovation Happens Implementing
- Page 102 and 103:
their experiences and what they car
- Page 104 and 105:
Right now, educational software is
- Page 106 and 107:
Most districts around the country h
- Page 108 and 109:
several blended-learning schools (s
- Page 110 and 111:
Incorporating Blended Learning into
- Page 112 and 113:
If you’re open to higher-risk str
- Page 114 and 115:
• Fund the operations of advocacy
- Page 116 and 117:
• Support the independent design
- Page 118 and 119:
Don’t expect site visits alone to
- Page 120 and 121:
ing grants, “we actually go in an
- Page 122 and 123:
Most effective philanthropy starts
- Page 124 and 125:
A number of ed-tech experts argue t
- Page 126 and 127:
ecause of the government monopoly i
- Page 128 and 129:
some best practices, and give out $
- Page 130 and 131:
This combination of the advantages
- Page 132 and 133:
learning is different from full-tim
- Page 134 and 135:
lems and opportunities in American
- Page 136 and 137:
alized instruction for students. Po
- Page 139 and 140:
138 INDEX 2 Revolutions, 135 3X for
- Page 141 and 142:
INDEX 140 Hamilton, Scott, 10, 82-8
- Page 143:
INDEX 142 Stanford Research Institu
- Page 146 and 147:
Breakthrough Groups Our Breakthroug
- Page 149 and 150:
148 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Laura Vanderka