Commonwealth Forestry Review
Commonwealth Forestry Review
Commonwealth Forestry Review
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
34 COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY REVIEW<br />
TABLE 5<br />
TOTAL HEIGHTS (M) AND FRESH WEIGHTS (G) OF Eucalyptus grandis SEEDLINGS GROWN IN<br />
POTS ON A MAMBILLA PLATEAU SURFACE AND SUBSOIL<br />
Treatment<br />
I<br />
Surface Soil I Subsoil<br />
0-6 inches (0-0.15 m.) 12-18 inches (0.30-0.46 m.)<br />
I<br />
Fresh Weight Total Height I Fresh Weight Total Height<br />
(g) I (m) (g) (m)<br />
I<br />
Control<br />
4.5 0.175 0.15 0.034<br />
N I 8.8 0.247 0.45 0.065<br />
P 14.9 0.283 3.67 0.148<br />
K 11.6 0.270 0.19 0.034<br />
NP 13.0 0.305 1.81 0.187<br />
NK 8.1 0.240 0.06 0.029<br />
PK 15.1 0.314 3.15 0.151<br />
NPK 13.7 0.300 2.01 0.092<br />
CaMg 14.3 0.326 0.44 0.047<br />
I<br />
NPK, Ca Mg 17.2<br />
0.379 7.05 0.216<br />
NPK, Ca Mg, Micro* 15.1 0.325 10.65 0.290<br />
NPK, Micro 16.7 0.336<br />
6.49 0.225<br />
B, NPK, CaMg 19.5 0.387 8.99 0.337<br />
Boron 7.8 0.218 0.47 0.047<br />
*Micronutrients are tnanganese, zinc, copper, molybdenum and boron<br />
Plants receiving only CaMg were about the same size as those receiving P alone<br />
or in combination with Nand K, and were significantly larger than the controls.<br />
No tissue tests were made so it was not possible to tell, as planned, if :CaMg increased<br />
the availability of soil P to the seedlings. 'Seedlings receiving B alone were<br />
about 75 per cent heavier than the controls but the difference was not quite significant<br />
at the 5 per cent probability level. T'here is no evidence that the see'dlings<br />
responded to the other micronutrients-manganese, zinc, copp1er and molybdenum.<br />
The evidence as a whole points to P as the principal limiting element with the<br />
suggestion that B may also be re'quired and that liming may help, increase P<br />
availability in the less acid surface soil. Because of the rather large variations in<br />
treatment response between replicates a more detailed discussion of the interactions<br />
of various treatments does not seem warranted. The' need for field fertiliser trials<br />
employing at least P. B, Ca and N alone and in combinations, is indicated.<br />
I