20.04.2013 Views

The basic color terms of Russian* - Walter de Gruyter

The basic color terms of Russian* - Walter de Gruyter

The basic color terms of Russian* - Walter de Gruyter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86 /. Davies and G. Corbett<br />

relatively frequently in the list task by the British — almost half the<br />

sample <strong>of</strong>fered it — but used infrequently in the naming task. Even when<br />

it was used, it was with little consensus, as indicated by its wi<strong>de</strong> distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> cooccurrence scores in Table 8.<br />

4. Discussion<br />

In the introduction we said that the probable <strong>basic</strong> <strong>color</strong> <strong>terms</strong> <strong>of</strong> Russian<br />

are the following:<br />

belyj 'white', cernyj 'black', krasnyj 'red', zelenyj 'green', zeltyj 'yellow',<br />

sinij 'dark blue', goluboj 'light blue', koricnevyj 'brown 9 , fioletovyj 'purple',<br />

rozovyj 'pink', oranzevyj Orange', seryj 'gray'.<br />

<strong>The</strong> main questions were whether sinij 'dark blue' and goluboj 'light blue'<br />

were both <strong>basic</strong>, and whether fioletovyj 'purple' was <strong>de</strong>finitely the <strong>basic</strong><br />

term for the purple region. Our data support the claim that the 12 <strong>terms</strong><br />

we give above are all <strong>basic</strong>, including goluboj and fioletovyj. However,<br />

sirenevyj 'mauve' also achieves high scores.<br />

This claim for the <strong>basic</strong> status <strong>of</strong> the 12 <strong>terms</strong> given above is most<br />

clearly supported by the data from the list task. <strong>The</strong>se <strong>terms</strong> are each<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by more people than any other term, and there is a reasonably<br />

clear "step" between the least frequent <strong>of</strong> these twelve — seryj 'gray' —<br />

which was <strong>of</strong>fered by 69% <strong>of</strong> the sample, and the most frequent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

remaining <strong>terms</strong> — sirenevyj 'mauve' — which was <strong>of</strong>fered by 52% <strong>of</strong><br />

the sample. <strong>The</strong> list position measure does not achieve such a clean<br />

separation between the 12 <strong>terms</strong> we claim are <strong>basic</strong> and the rest, but even<br />

so it is just koricnevyj 'brown' and seryj 'gray' that have lower mean<br />

positions than a few non<strong>basic</strong> <strong>terms</strong>, such as sirenevyj 'mauve' and<br />

bordovyj 'claret'. <strong>The</strong> list position measure is perhaps less reliable than<br />

the list frequency measure, because a term with a low frequency can still<br />

achieve a high list position if the few people who do <strong>of</strong>fer it <strong>of</strong>fer it early<br />

in their lists.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the 12 putative <strong>basic</strong> <strong>terms</strong> also have high frequency <strong>of</strong> naming<br />

scores. <strong>The</strong> exceptions are belyj 'white' and cernyj 'black'. In addition,<br />

however, sirenevyj 'mauve' has the seventh highest frequency <strong>of</strong> use in<br />

tile naming. But what indicates that the two achromatic <strong>terms</strong> are <strong>de</strong>finitely<br />

<strong>basic</strong>, whereas sirenevyj is probably not, are the measures <strong>of</strong> consensus<br />

across respon<strong>de</strong>nts. <strong>The</strong>re are just 13 <strong>terms</strong> that have dominance<br />

scores greater than zero; that is, there is at least one tile for which half<br />

or more <strong>of</strong> the sample use a given term; these are the 12 putative <strong>basic</strong><br />

<strong>terms</strong> plus sir envyj 'mauve'. But sirenevyj 'mauve' only just achieves

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!