A review of the decapod crustaceans from the Tertiary of the Isle of ...

44
New hypotheses on the origin of the Xanthoidea MacLeay, 838. J.
Paleont., 79(2), 277–295.
Schweitzer, C. E. and Feldmann, R. M. (200 ), Differentiation of the fossil
Hexapodidae Miers, 1886 (Decapoda: Brachyura) from similar forms.
J. Paleont., 75(2), 230–246.
Schweitzer, C. E. and Feldmann, R. M. (2003), Differentiation of the fossil
Hexapodidae, Miers, 1876 (Decapoda: Brachyura) from similar
forms. J. Paleont., 75, 330–345.
Siebold, P, F. von ( 824), De historiae naturalis in Japonia statu, nec non de
augmento emolumentisque in decursu perscrutionorum expectandis
disseratio, cui accedunt Spicilegia Faunae Japonicae. Batavia. 16 pp.
Stephenson, W. and Campbell, B. (1960), The Australian portunids
(Crustacea: Portunidae) IV: Remaining genera. Austral. J. Mar.
Freshw. Res., 11( ), 73– 2.
Stoliczka, F. (1871), Observations on fossil crabs from tertiary deposits in
Sind and Kutch. Mem. Palaeont. Indica, (7) 14, vol. 1, 1–16.
Via, L. ( 959), Decápodos fósiles del Eoceno español (resumen-avance de la
tesis doctoral). Bol. I. G. M. E., 70, 33 –402.
Weber, F. ( 795), Nomenclator Entomologicus secundum Entomologium
systematicum ill. Fabrieii, adjectis speciebus recens detectis et
Plate 1
Vecticallichirus abditus gen. et sp. nov. Early Eocene Headon Beds, Whitecliff Bay.
Figs. –8. Form a left hand series:
Fig. . Outer surface of dactylus, NHM IC 584.
Fig. 2. Outer surface of associated dactylus and fixed finger, NHM IC 585.
Fig. 3. Inner surface of associated dactylus and fixed finger, NHM IC 586.
Fig. 4. Outer of part cheliped, Holotype, NHM IC 587.
Fig. 5. Inner surface of propodus, NHM IC 588.
Fig. 6. Outer surface of ischium , NHM IC 589.
Fig. 7. Outer surface of merus, NHM IC 590.
Fig. 8. Inner surface of merus, NHM IC 59 .
Figs. 9– 5. Form a right hand series:
Fig. 9. Outer surface of associated ischium and merus, NMH IC 592.
Fig. 0. Outer suface of merus, NHM IC 593.
Fig. . Inner surface of dactylus NHM IC 594.
Fig. 2. Outer surface of dactylus, NHM IC 595.
Fig. 13. Inner surface of fixed finger, NHM IC 596.
Fig. 4. Outer surface of of propodus, NHM IC 597.
Fig. 5. Outer surface of chela of periopod , NHM IC. 598.
Fig. 16. a, abdominal somites 4-6 and telson; b, uropod; c, pereiopod, NHM IC 599.
Scale bars equal 5.0 mm.
varietatibus. Chilonii [Kiel] and Hamburgi. viii+ 7 pp.
White, A. W. ( 847), List of the specimens in the collection of the British
Museum. London, British Museum, 8, 43 pp.
Woods, H. ( 925– 93 ), A monograph of the fossil macrurous Crustacea of
England. Mon. Palaeont. Soc. London, 22 pp.
Woodward, H. (1866–1878), A monograph of the British Fossil Crustacea
belonging to the order Merostomata. Mon. Palaeont. Soc. London,
ii+263 pp.
Woodward, H. (1867), On a new genus of shore-crab Goniocypoda Edwardsii
from the Lower Eocene of Hampshire. Geol. Mag., 4, 529–53 .
Woodward, H. (1868), Fourth report on the structure and classification of the
fossil Crustacea. Rep. Brit. Assoc. Advance. Sci. for 1868, 72–75.
Woodward, H. ( 87 ), Notes on new Crustaceans from the Lower Eocene of
Portsmouth. Q. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 27, 90– 92.
Woodward, H. ( 873), Further nortes on Eocene Crustacea from Portsmouth.
Q. Jl. geol. Soc. Lond., 29, 25–3 .
Woodward, H. ( 903), Fossil prawns from the Osborne Beds, Isle of Wight.
Geol. Mag., n.s. Dec. 4, 10, 97– 02.
Manuscript accepted on October , 20