25.04.2013 Views

Celestial Navigation Net - ZetaTalk

Celestial Navigation Net - ZetaTalk

Celestial Navigation Net - ZetaTalk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How David Thompson Navigated<br />

'common watches' (pocket watches) with second hands.<br />

Today, navigators can compute both latitude and longitude from a pair of<br />

observations. In Thompson's time, due to the lack of accurate watches,<br />

latitude and longitude observations were done separately.<br />

The accuracy of any given observation depends upon what type it was.<br />

Thompson uses three different techniques for observing latitudes. The first is<br />

called a double meridian altitude observation, usually of the sun. This means<br />

that he is observing the height of the sun when it is at high noon (crossing<br />

the meridian), and he is doing it using his parallel glasses, a reflecting artificial<br />

horizon made by placing a glass cover over a bowl of mercury. ('Double'<br />

refers to the fact that the altitude measured with an artificial horizon is twice<br />

what would have been measured using a sea horizon.) Using the same<br />

techniques today, I generally compute latitudes to an accuracy better than<br />

half of a nautical mile. (1 nm = 1852 meters). On good days my accuracy is<br />

within 300 meters. Based on my comparisons with David Thompson's data<br />

from Rocky Mountain House, as well as the data in the case study, I feel that<br />

for any of Thompson's double meridian altitude observations it is reasonable<br />

to assume that his observation would place him within 1½ nautical miles of<br />

his true latitude.<br />

Thompson sometimes mentions a second type of latitude observation which<br />

he calls a meridian altitude. This is an ambiguous term. In most cases, it means<br />

that he made the observation using his artificial horizon, but in some cases it<br />

means that he has used a local body of water as an artificial horizon. This<br />

technique involves using the far shore of a lake or long river as a level, and<br />

estimating the distance to the far shore. The navigator then applies a<br />

correction to the observation based on this estimate. This technique is more<br />

properly known as the dip short method. It is far less reliable than using an<br />

artificial horizon because of the difficulty of accurately estimating the<br />

distance to the far shore. Thompson did not make any dip short observations<br />

during the case study period.<br />

The third method of observing for latitude is called a double altitude<br />

http://www.northwestjournal.ca/dtnav.html (15 of 55) [9/6/2004 12:52:58 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!