25.04.2013 Views

Recent Organ Design Innovations and the 21st-century - Stichting ...

Recent Organ Design Innovations and the 21st-century - Stichting ...

Recent Organ Design Innovations and the 21st-century - Stichting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“Man hat Recht, die Orgel die Königin der Instrumente zu nennen, von ihrer Majestät zu<br />

sprechen, und sie zu beherrschen ist wirklich ein aristokratisches Vergnügen.” 24<br />

“Man is right to call <strong>the</strong> organ <strong>the</strong> queen of instruments <strong>and</strong> speak of its majesty, for she is <strong>the</strong><br />

master of aristocratic pleasure.”<br />

By “aristocratic pleasure” Schönberg clearly intends to relegate <strong>the</strong> organ to a past aes<strong>the</strong>tic,<br />

unsuitable for his musical vision. However, in a letter to Werner David in 1949, Schönberg discussed<br />

what he believed to be <strong>the</strong> ideal organ for his musical aes<strong>the</strong>tic. It should have permit dynamic<br />

variation of each <strong>and</strong> every tone independently over a range of seven or eight octaves <strong>and</strong> contain only<br />

a few registers, each of which should be capable of <strong>the</strong> widest dynamic expression 25 . Throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

20th <strong>and</strong> into <strong>the</strong> <strong>21st</strong> centuries, composers have been interested in instruments capable of micro<br />

control over <strong>the</strong> broadest range of musical parameters, be it in search of spectral flexibility or total<br />

serialization.<br />

As discussed earlier, instrument builders including Stein <strong>and</strong> De Lorenzi found various solutions<br />

to allow dynamic control by <strong>the</strong> finger on <strong>the</strong> keyboard. Fortunately, Peter Kraul had a similar interest in<br />

direct expressive control <strong>and</strong> had developed a radical new design involving a double wind chest with<br />

differing actions <strong>and</strong> wind pressures. The first concrete realization of <strong>the</strong> flexible wind ideas of Kraul<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reference group came to life in Prototype I. A laboratory device with three keys <strong>and</strong> five stops,<br />

Prototype I contains an impressive variety of strictly mechanical design innovations, <strong>the</strong> most salient of<br />

which is <strong>the</strong> double pallet box. Two pallets can be found at <strong>the</strong> head of each of <strong>the</strong> three wind channels:<br />

a traditional tail-pallet in <strong>the</strong> chest below, <strong>and</strong> a specially designed cone-pallet in a chest above <strong>the</strong> wind<br />

channel (example 3). The cone-pallet features a disc-<strong>and</strong>-cone design that when lifted gradually<br />

increases <strong>the</strong> cross section of <strong>the</strong> aperture, essentially eliminating pluck <strong>and</strong> allowing sensitive control of<br />

24 Arnold Schönberg, “Die Zukunft der Orgel” (unpublished essay, Arnold Schönberg Center, Vienna, Austria,<br />

1906/07), quoted in Matthias Giesen, “Arnold Schönberg und die Orgel,” Österreichisches Orgelforum 7 (June<br />

2005): 14.<br />

25 Eidenbenz, “Swell Shudders, Wind Swells,” 91.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!