26.04.2013 Views

p17p35ujimn9ejc9cap81i1j7e4.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D GENERALIZATIONS ABOUT CRYSTAL STRUCTURES BASED ON PERIODICITY<br />

Table 1.6. A test of the radius ratio rules for binary 1:1 compounds<br />

compound r r r /r predicted CN observed CN<br />

CsCl 1.67 1.81 0.92 8 8<br />

CsBr 1.67 1.95 0.86 8 8<br />

RbCl 1.48 1.81 0.82 8 6<br />

TlBr 1.15 1.95 0.59 6 8<br />

TlI 1.15 2.16 0.53 6 8<br />

KI 1.33 2.16 0.62 6 6<br />

MgO 0.82 1.76 0.46 6 6<br />

MnO 0.75 1.76 0.43 6 6<br />

CoO 0.72 1.76 0.41 6 6<br />

NiO 0.69 1.76 0.39 4 6<br />

ZnO 0.88 1.76 0.50 6 4<br />

CdO 1.14 1.76 0.65 6 6<br />

ZnS 0.88 2.19 0.40 4 4<br />

ZnSe 0.88 2.38 0.37 4 4<br />

Carefully chosen examples can make the radius ratio concept look like an<br />

accurate predictive tool. However, it is often in error, particularly in complex<br />

structures and when the bonding becomes increasingly covalent (where the hard<br />

sphere model breaks down). Pauling [9] originally used the univalent radii (rather<br />

than crystal radii) to calculate the radius ratio. A table of these values, together<br />

with the crystal radii, can be found in Appendix 1A. However, the success rate<br />

of the predictions does not depend strongly on which set of radii are used, as<br />

long as both the cation and anion radii come from a set that was derived using<br />

consistent assumptions. Examples of accurate and inaccurate predictions are<br />

shown in Table 1.6 (calculated using Pauling’s univalent radii). Important<br />

reasons for the inadequacy of this theory are the assumption of spherically symmetric<br />

forces and symmetric coordination, the assumption that atoms have the<br />

same size in all chemical environments, and the underestimation of ‘like-atom’<br />

repulsions.<br />

iii. Orbital hybridization in covalent structures<br />

In contrast to isotropically bound metallic and ionic systems, covalent bonding<br />

is directional. When a covalent bond is formed, electron density is increased<br />

along the line connecting two bonding atoms. Covalent structures are formed<br />

from atoms that have both s and p valence electrons (in effect, those on the righthand<br />

side of the periodic chart with relatively high electronegativities). The formation<br />

of sp hybrid orbitals results in four equivalent sp 3 orbitals directed<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!