30.04.2013 Views

Legal Due Diligence Report - BFRE - Brazilian Finance e Real Estate

Legal Due Diligence Report - BFRE - Brazilian Finance e Real Estate

Legal Due Diligence Report - BFRE - Brazilian Finance e Real Estate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

see the Annex A to this <strong>Report</strong>). Among those lawsuits we have identified the following cases<br />

that may represent a relevant contingency to the former co-owners:<br />

(a) Lawsuits against Plaza Shopping Empreendimentos<br />

DOCS - 351174v1<br />

On October 14, 2002, Fundação CESP, a co-owner of West Plaza Shopping,<br />

filed a lawsuit against some of the others co-owners, including Plaza Shopping<br />

Empreendimentos, and against other Defendants, aiming at the termination of<br />

the management agreement of the shopping entered into with Plaza Paulista<br />

Administração de Shopping Centers S/C Ltda. coupled with indemnification for<br />

losses and damages corresponding to part of the revenue it should be entitled<br />

as a co-owner, allegedly not duly received. Fundação CESP also requested a<br />

preliminary injunction for the immediate removal of Plaza Paulista as the<br />

manager of the shopping and the judicial seizure (“penhora judicial”) of the<br />

revenue of Plaza Shopping Empreendimentos and Vendex do Brasil Indústria<br />

e Comércio.<br />

The losses and damages shall be evaluated in expert evidence and the<br />

corresponding value is not appraisable at this moment.<br />

When the lawsuit commenced (October 14, 2002), Plaza Shopping<br />

Empreendimentos had not yet sold its stake in Botafogo Praia Shopping to<br />

Plaza Trust SPCO (this sale took place only on November 21, 2002), but when<br />

it was summoned (on January 27, 2003) the sale of said stake to Plaza Trust<br />

SPCO had already been accomplished. Therefore and also because there are<br />

many other defendants in the lawsuit, we estimate that the risk of said lawsuit<br />

having a negative impact on the successive transactions involving the stake of<br />

Plaza Shopping Empreendimentos on Botafogo Praia Shopping is remote.<br />

After the sale of the stake of Plaza Empreendimentos in Botafogo Praia<br />

Shopping to Plaza Trust SPCO, Fundação CESP filed (on December 11, 2002)<br />

a similar lawsuit as the one summarized above against the same Defendants<br />

aiming at the termination of the management agreement of Shopping Center<br />

Paulista entered into with Plaza Paulista Administração de Shopping Centers<br />

S/C Ltda. also coupled with indemnification for losses and damages. As said<br />

lawsuit was commenced after Plaza Empreendimentos had sold its stake in<br />

Botafogo Praia Shopping, we believe that the result of the claim will not impact<br />

the successive transactions involving the stake of Plaza Shopping<br />

Empreendimentos in Botafogo Praia Shopping.<br />

(b) Lawsuits against Plaza Shopping Trust SPCO<br />

Fundação CESP filed a collection lawsuit against Plaza Shopping Trust SPCO<br />

Ltda. aiming at the payment of 30% of the rents arising from some lease<br />

agreements of Shopping Center West Plaza during the period from November<br />

2000 until March 2007, when the Plaintiff was a co-owner of said shopping.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!