Roland_Berger_Offshore_Wind_Study_20130506

More documents

Recommendations

Info

C. Offshore potential to meet LCoE targets Utilities – Investors – Cost competitiveness – Saving potential – Costs of energy 2013_RBSC_Offshore_Wind_Study.pptx 16
C. Offshore potential to meet LCoE targets Utilities are dominant in farm ownership and operation – Financial investors required to finance the pipelines Utilities by capacity and investment model OFFSHORE CAPACITY [MW] PIPELINE [MW, EUR] 3 0 25 160 90 140 Source: Company websites; 4COffshore; Roland Berger 470 840 800 4,700 2,900 3,400 7,500 6,000 6,000 1,100 1,000 6,600 17 bn 10 bn 12 bn 27 bn 22 bn 22 bn 4 bn 4 bn 24 bn Status as of September 2012; estimated average investment volume for pipeline: EUR 3.6 m per MW INVESTMENT MODELS 1 2 3 STANDALONE > One utility owns, develops and operates project > Utility has full control, but bears all risks Examples: RWE Innogy 1 (RWE), Amrumbank West (E.ON), Horns Rev2 (DONG) LEAD INVESTOR > Leading utility with one or more minority investors > Utility shares risk and reduces equity requirements Examples: DanTysk (Vattenfall, SWM), Baltic 1 (EnBW, municipal utilities) JOINT VENTURE > A group of equal players join forces > Project development by joint venture company Examples: Egmond aan Zee (Vattenfall, Shell), Borkum West II (Trainel), C-Power (RWE, EDF, others) 2013_RBSC_Offshore_Wind_Study.pptx 17
Page 1 and 2: OFFSHORE WIND TOWARD 2020 ON THE PA
Page 3 and 4: A. Offshore market volume of EUR 13
Page 9 and 10: B. Value chain evaluation for offsh
Page 15: B. Value chain evaluation for offsh
Page 19 and 20: Share in generation mix C. Offshore
Page 21 and 22: C. Offshore potential to meet LCoE
Page 23 and 24: D. Conclusion Offshore is setting a
Page 25: 2013_RBSC_Offshore_Wind_Study.pptx

Roland_Berger_Offshore_Wind_Study_20130506

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?